GHSA-CG5M-P8PG-93CG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-26 18:30 – Updated: 2025-03-27 12:30
VLAI
Details
Theoretically, it would be possible for an attacker to brute-force the password for an instance in single-user password protection mode via a timing attack given the linear nature of the !== used for comparison.
The risk is minified by the additional overhead of the request, which varies in a non-constant nature making the attack less reliable to execute
Severity
7.1 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-0436"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-203",
"CWE-764"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-02-26T16:27:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Theoretically, it would be possible for an attacker to brute-force the password for an instance in single-user password protection mode via a timing attack given the linear nature of the `!==` used for comparison.\n\nThe risk is minified by the additional overhead of the request, which varies in a non-constant nature making the attack less reliable to execute",
"id": "GHSA-cg5m-p8pg-93cg",
"modified": "2025-03-27T12:30:34Z",
"published": "2024-02-26T18:30:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0436"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mintplex-labs/anything-llm/commit/3c859ba3038121b67fb98e87dc52617fa27cbef0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3e73cb96-c038-46a1-81b7-4d2215b36268"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…