ghsa-cv67-23pp-jfh2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-06-19 15:30
Modified
2024-06-19 15:30
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
libbpf: Prevent null-pointer dereference when prog to load has no BTF
In bpf_objec_load_prog(), there's no guarantee that obj->btf is non-NULL when passing it to btf__fd(), and this function does not perform any check before dereferencing its argument (as bpf_object__btf_fd() used to do). As a consequence, we get segmentation fault errors in bpftool (for example) when trying to load programs that come without BTF information.
v2: Keep btf__fd() in the fix instead of reverting to bpf_object__btf_fd().
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-38574" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-06-19T14:15:17Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlibbpf: Prevent null-pointer dereference when prog to load has no BTF\n\nIn bpf_objec_load_prog(), there\u0027s no guarantee that obj-\u003ebtf is non-NULL\nwhen passing it to btf__fd(), and this function does not perform any\ncheck before dereferencing its argument (as bpf_object__btf_fd() used to\ndo). As a consequence, we get segmentation fault errors in bpftool (for\nexample) when trying to load programs that come without BTF information.\n\nv2: Keep btf__fd() in the fix instead of reverting to bpf_object__btf_fd().", "id": "GHSA-cv67-23pp-jfh2", "modified": "2024-06-19T15:30:53Z", "published": "2024-06-19T15:30:53Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38574" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fd91360a75833b7110af9834ae26c977e1273e0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bf48fa19a4b1d186e08b20bf7e5de26a15644fb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef80b59acfa4dee4b5eaccb15572b69248831104" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.