GHSA-FFJ9-4CRC-Q7WF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-07 15:30 – Updated: 2023-04-14 20:26
VLAI?
Summary
Apache Airflow Spark Provider vulnerable to improper input validation
Details
Apache Software Foundation Apache Airflow Spark Provider before 4.0.1 is vulnerable to improper input validation because the host and schema of JDBC Hook can contain / and ? which is used to denote the end of the field.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-28710"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-04-07T22:22:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-07T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Apache Software Foundation Apache Airflow Spark Provider before 4.0.1 is vulnerable to improper input validation because the host and schema of JDBC Hook can contain `/` and `?` which is used to denote the end of the field.",
"id": "GHSA-ffj9-4crc-q7wf",
"modified": "2023-04-14T20:26:33Z",
"published": "2023-04-07T15:30:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28710"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30223"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lb9w9114ow00h2nkn8bjm106v5x1p1d2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/04/07/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Airflow Spark Provider vulnerable to improper input validation"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…