GHSA-FJP9-RFVR-287M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-25 09:32 – Updated: 2024-12-17 15:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/amdgpu: fix refcount leak
[Why] the gem object rfb->base.obj[0] is get according to num_planes in amdgpufb_create, but is not put according to num_planes
[How] put rfb->base.obj[0] in amdgpu_fbdev_destroy according to num_planes
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-47144"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-25T09:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/amdgpu: fix refcount leak\n\n[Why]\nthe gem object rfb-\u003ebase.obj[0] is get according to num_planes\nin amdgpufb_create, but is not put according to num_planes\n\n[How]\nput rfb-\u003ebase.obj[0] in amdgpu_fbdev_destroy according to num_planes",
"id": "GHSA-fjp9-rfvr-287m",
"modified": "2024-12-17T15:31:43Z",
"published": "2024-03-25T09:32:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47144"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/599e5d61ace952b0bb9bd942b198bbd0cfded1d7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95a4ec905e51a30c64cf2d78b04a7acbeae5ca94"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9fdb8ed37a3a44f9c49372b69f87fd5f61cb3240"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dde2656e0bbb2ac7d83a7bd95a8d5c3c95bbc009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa7e6abc75f3d491bc561734312d065dc9dc2a77"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…