GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-G37W-WJP2-MP83

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-19 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-12 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

VMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host()

Syzkaller hit 'WARNING in dg_dispatch_as_host' bug.

memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 56) of single field "&dg_info->msg" at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (size 24)

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 dg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237

Some code commentry, based on my understanding:

544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)->payload_size) /// This is 24 + payload_size

memcpy(&dg_info->msg, dg, dg_size); Destination = dg_info->msg ---> this is a 24 byte structure(struct vmci_datagram) Source = dg --> this is a 24 byte structure (struct vmci_datagram) Size = dg_size = 24 + payload_size

{payload_size = 56-24 =32} -- Syzkaller managed to set payload_size to 32.

35 struct delayed_datagram_info { 36 struct datagram_entry entry; 37 struct work_struct work; 38 bool in_dg_host_queue; 39 / msg and msg_payload must be together. */ 40 struct vmci_datagram msg; 41 u8 msg_payload[]; 42 };

So those extra bytes of payload are copied into msg_payload[], a run time warning is seen while fuzzing with Syzkaller.

One possible way to fix the warning is to split the memcpy() into two parts -- one -- direct assignment of msg and second taking care of payload.

Gustavo quoted: "Under FORTIFY_SOURCE we should not copy data across multiple members in a structure."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-35944"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-19T11:15:50Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nVMCI: Fix memcpy() run-time warning in dg_dispatch_as_host()\n\nSyzkaller hit \u0027WARNING in dg_dispatch_as_host\u0027 bug.\n\nmemcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 56) of single field \"\u0026dg_info-\u003emsg\"\nat drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237 (size 24)\n\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1555 at drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237\ndg_dispatch_as_host+0x88e/0xa60 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_datagram.c:237\n\nSome code commentry, based on my understanding:\n\n544 #define VMCI_DG_SIZE(_dg) (VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE + (size_t)(_dg)-\u003epayload_size)\n/// This is 24 + payload_size\n\nmemcpy(\u0026dg_info-\u003emsg, dg, dg_size);\n\tDestination = dg_info-\u003emsg ---\u003e this is a 24 byte\n\t\t\t\t\tstructure(struct vmci_datagram)\n\tSource = dg --\u003e this is a 24 byte structure (struct vmci_datagram)\n\tSize = dg_size = 24 + payload_size\n\n{payload_size = 56-24 =32} -- Syzkaller managed to set payload_size to 32.\n\n 35 struct delayed_datagram_info {\n 36         struct datagram_entry *entry;\n 37         struct work_struct work;\n 38         bool in_dg_host_queue;\n 39         /* msg and msg_payload must be together. */\n 40         struct vmci_datagram msg;\n 41         u8 msg_payload[];\n 42 };\n\nSo those extra bytes of payload are copied into msg_payload[], a run time\nwarning is seen while fuzzing with Syzkaller.\n\nOne possible way to fix the warning is to split the memcpy() into\ntwo parts -- one -- direct assignment of msg and second taking care of payload.\n\nGustavo quoted:\n\"Under FORTIFY_SOURCE we should not copy data across multiple members\nin a structure.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-g37w-wjp2-mp83",
  "modified": "2026-05-12T12:31:50Z",
  "published": "2024-05-19T12:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35944"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/130b0cd064874e0d0f58e18fb00e6f3993e90c74"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19b070fefd0d024af3daa7329cbc0d00de5302ec"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/491a1eb07c2bd8841d63cb5263455e185be5866f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ad78c5047dc4076d0b3c4fad4f42ffe9c86e8100"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dae70a57565686f16089737adb8ac64471570f73"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e87bb99d2df6512d8ee37a5d63d2ca9a39a8c051"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f15eca95138b3d4ec17b63c3c1937b0aa0d3624b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/feacd430b42bbfa9ab3ed9e4f38b86c43e348c75"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00020.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…