ghsa-h7wh-wpqg-g2jm
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sch_cake: do not call cake_destroy() from cake_init()
qdiscs are not supposed to call their own destroy() method from init(), because core stack already does that.
syzbot was able to trigger use after free:
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock)
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21902 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21902 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 __mutex_lock+0x9ec/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 21902 Comm: syz-executor189 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 [inline]
RIP: 0010:__mutex_lock+0x9ec/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740
Code: 08 84 d2 0f 85 19 08 00 00 8b 05 97 38 4b 04 85 c0 0f 85 27 f7 ff ff 48 c7 c6 20 00 ac 89 48 c7 c7 a0 fe ab 89 e8 bf 76 ba ff <0f> 0b e9 0d f7 ff ff 48 8b 44 24 40 48 8d b8 c8 08 00 00 48 89 f8
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000627f290 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff88802315d700 RSI: ffffffff815f1db8 RDI: fffff52000c4fe44
RBP: ffff88818f28e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffffffff815ebb5e R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffc9000627f458 R15: 0000000093c30000
FS: 0000555556abc400(0000) GS:ffff8880b9c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fda689c3303 CR3: 000000001cfbb000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
Call Trace:
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-47598"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-416"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-06-19T15:15:54Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsch_cake: do not call cake_destroy() from cake_init()\n\nqdiscs are not supposed to call their own destroy() method\nfrom init(), because core stack already does that.\n\nsyzbot was able to trigger use after free:\n\nDEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock-\u003emagic != lock)\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21902 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 [inline]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 21902 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 __mutex_lock+0x9ec/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 21902 Comm: syz-executor189 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011\nRIP: 0010:__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:586 [inline]\nRIP: 0010:__mutex_lock+0x9ec/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:740\nCode: 08 84 d2 0f 85 19 08 00 00 8b 05 97 38 4b 04 85 c0 0f 85 27 f7 ff ff 48 c7 c6 20 00 ac 89 48 c7 c7 a0 fe ab 89 e8 bf 76 ba ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b e9 0d f7 ff ff 48 8b 44 24 40 48 8d b8 c8 08 00 00 48 89 f8\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000627f290 EFLAGS: 00010282\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: ffff88802315d700 RSI: ffffffff815f1db8 RDI: fffff52000c4fe44\nRBP: ffff88818f28e000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffffffff815ebb5e R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffc9000627f458 R15: 0000000093c30000\nFS: 0000555556abc400(0000) GS:ffff8880b9c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007fda689c3303 CR3: 000000001cfbb000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n tcf_chain0_head_change_cb_del+0x2e/0x3d0 net/sched/cls_api.c:810\n tcf_block_put_ext net/sched/cls_api.c:1381 [inline]\n tcf_block_put_ext net/sched/cls_api.c:1376 [inline]\n tcf_block_put+0xbc/0x130 net/sched/cls_api.c:1394\n cake_destroy+0x3f/0x80 net/sched/sch_cake.c:2695\n qdisc_create.constprop.0+0x9da/0x10f0 net/sched/sch_api.c:1293\n tc_modify_qdisc+0x4c5/0x1980 net/sched/sch_api.c:1660\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x413/0xb80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5571\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2496\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345\n netlink_sendmsg+0x904/0xdf0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2409\n ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2463\n __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2492\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\nRIP: 0033:0x7f1bb06badb9\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7f1bb06bad8f.\nRSP: 002b:00007fff3012a658 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f1bb06badb9\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000200007c0 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000003\nR10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff3012a688\nR13: 00007fff3012a6a0 R14: 00007fff3012a6e0 R15: 00000000000013c2\n \u003c/TASK\u003e",
"id": "GHSA-h7wh-wpqg-g2jm",
"modified": "2024-08-27T18:31:35Z",
"published": "2024-06-19T15:30:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d80462fbdcafd536dcad7569e65d3d14a7e9f2f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20ad1ef02f9ad5e1dda9eeb113e4c158b4806986"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e388232e630ebe4f94b4a0715ec98c0e2b314a3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab443c53916730862cec202078d36fd4008bea79"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6deae2e2d83bd267e1986f5d71d8c458e18fd99"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.