ghsa-m974-647v-whv7
Vulnerability from github
Impact
A remote attacker may be able to bypass SAML authentication on a website using passport-saml. A successful attack requires that the attacker is in possession of an arbitrary IDP signed XML element. Depending on the IDP used, fully unauthenticated attacks (e.g without access to a valid user) might also be feasible if generation of a signed message can be triggered.
Patches
Users should upgrade to passport-saml 3.2.2 or newer. The issue was also present in the beta releases of node-saml
before v4.0.0-beta.5.
Workarounds
Disable SAML authentication.
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open a discussion in the node-saml repo
Credits
- Felix Wilhelm of Google Project Zero
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "npm", name: "passport-saml", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "3.2.2", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "npm", name: "node-saml", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "4.0.0-beta.5", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "npm", name: "@node-saml/node-saml", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "4.0.0-beta.5", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "npm", name: "@node-saml/passport-saml", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "4.0.0-beta.3", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-39299", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-347", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2022-10-12T22:05:41Z", nvd_published_at: "2022-10-12T21:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "### Impact\n\nA remote attacker may be able to bypass SAML authentication on a website using passport-saml. A successful attack requires that the attacker is in possession of an arbitrary IDP signed XML element. Depending on the IDP used, fully unauthenticated attacks (e.g without access to a valid user) might also be feasible if generation of a signed message can be triggered.\n\n### Patches\n\nUsers should upgrade to passport-saml 3.2.2 or newer. The issue was also present in the beta releases of `node-saml` before v4.0.0-beta.5.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nDisable SAML authentication.\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open a discussion in the [node-saml repo](https://github.com/node-saml/node-saml/discussions)\n\n### Credits\n\n* Felix Wilhelm of Google Project Zero\n", id: "GHSA-m974-647v-whv7", modified: "2022-10-18T03:11:22Z", published: "2022-10-12T22:05:41Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/node-saml/passport-saml/security/advisories/GHSA-m974-647v-whv7", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39299", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/node-saml/passport-saml/commit/8b7e3f5a91c8e5ac7e890a0c90bc7491ce33155e", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/node-saml/passport-saml", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/node-saml/passport-saml/releases/tag/v3.2.2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169826/Node-saml-Root-Element-Signature-Bypass.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Signature bypass via multiple root elements", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.