ghsa-p4rx-7wvg-fwrc
Vulnerability from github
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
All versions of CRI-O running on cgroupv2 nodes.
Unchecked access to an experimental annotation allows a container to be unconfined. Back in 2021, support was added to support an experimental annotation that allows a user to request special resources in cgroupv2. It was supposed to be gated by an experimental annotation: io.kubernetes.cri-o.UnifiedCgroup, which was supposed to be filtered from the list of allowed annotations . However, there is a bug in this code which allows any user to specify this annotation, regardless of whether it's enabled on the node. The consequences of this are a pod can specify any amount of memory/cpu and get it, circumventing the kubernetes scheduler, and potentially be able to DOS a node.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? 1.29.1, 1.28.3, 1.27.3
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? use cgroupv1
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.29.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.29.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.29.0"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.28.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.28.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.27.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-6476"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400",
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-10T15:27:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-09T22:15:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\nAll versions of CRI-O running on cgroupv2 nodes. \nUnchecked access to an experimental annotation allows a container to be unconfined. Back in 2021, [support was added](https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/pull/4479) to support an experimental annotation that allows a user to request special resources in cgroupv2. It was supposed to be gated by an experimental annotation: `io.kubernetes.cri-o.UnifiedCgroup`, which was supposed to be filtered from the [list of allowed annotations](https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/main/pkg/config/workloads.go#L103-L107) . However, there is a bug in this code which allows any user to specify this annotation, regardless of whether it\u0027s enabled on the node. The consequences of this are a pod can specify any amount of memory/cpu and get it, circumventing the kubernetes scheduler, and potentially be able to DOS a node. \n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\n1.29.1, 1.28.3, 1.27.3\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\nuse cgroupv1\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n",
"id": "GHSA-p4rx-7wvg-fwrc",
"modified": "2024-01-10T15:27:45Z",
"published": "2024-01-10T15:27:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/security/advisories/GHSA-p4rx-7wvg-fwrc"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6476"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/pull/4479"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/commit/75effcb1a25851a736e82dba1f7d8cee93ee159e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0195"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0207"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-6476"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253994"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/main/pkg/config/workloads.go#L103-L107"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "CRI-O\u0027s pods can break out of resource confinement on cgroupv2"
}