ghsa-p4rx-7wvg-fwrc
Vulnerability from github
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
All versions of CRI-O running on cgroupv2 nodes.
Unchecked access to an experimental annotation allows a container to be unconfined. Back in 2021, support was added to support an experimental annotation that allows a user to request special resources in cgroupv2. It was supposed to be gated by an experimental annotation: io.kubernetes.cri-o.UnifiedCgroup
, which was supposed to be filtered from the list of allowed annotations . However, there is a bug in this code which allows any user to specify this annotation, regardless of whether it's enabled on the node. The consequences of this are a pod can specify any amount of memory/cpu and get it, circumventing the kubernetes scheduler, and potentially be able to DOS a node.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? 1.29.1, 1.28.3, 1.27.3
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? use cgroupv1
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "Go", "name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "1.29.0" }, { "fixed": "1.29.1" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "1.29.0" ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Go", "name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "1.28.0" }, { "fixed": "1.28.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "package": { "ecosystem": "Go", "name": "github.com/cri-o/cri-o" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "1.27.3" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-6476" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-400", "CWE-770" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-10T15:27:45Z", "nvd_published_at": "2024-01-09T22:15:43Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\nAll versions of CRI-O running on cgroupv2 nodes. \nUnchecked access to an experimental annotation allows a container to be unconfined. Back in 2021, [support was added](https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/pull/4479) to support an experimental annotation that allows a user to request special resources in cgroupv2. It was supposed to be gated by an experimental annotation: `io.kubernetes.cri-o.UnifiedCgroup`, which was supposed to be filtered from the [list of allowed annotations](https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/main/pkg/config/workloads.go#L103-L107) . However, there is a bug in this code which allows any user to specify this annotation, regardless of whether it\u0027s enabled on the node. The consequences of this are a pod can specify any amount of memory/cpu and get it, circumventing the kubernetes scheduler, and potentially be able to DOS a node. \n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\n1.29.1, 1.28.3, 1.27.3\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\nuse cgroupv1\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n", "id": "GHSA-p4rx-7wvg-fwrc", "modified": "2024-01-10T15:27:45Z", "published": "2024-01-10T15:27:45Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/security/advisories/GHSA-p4rx-7wvg-fwrc" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-6476" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/pull/4479" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/commit/75effcb1a25851a736e82dba1f7d8cee93ee159e" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0195" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0207" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-6476" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253994" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/main/pkg/config/workloads.go#L103-L107" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "CRI-O\u0027s pods can break out of resource confinement on cgroupv2" }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.