GHSA-P8GP-899C-JVQ9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-21 20:28 – Updated: 2023-08-24 21:48
VLAI
Summary
Wallabag user can reset data unintentionally
Details

Description

wallabag was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily reset annotations, entries and tags, by the GET request to /reset/annotations, /reset/entries, /reset/tags, /reset/archived.

This vulnerability has a CVSSv3.1 score of 4.3.

You should immediately patch your instance to version 2.6.3 or higher if you have more than one user and/or having open registration.

Resolution

These actions are now doable only via POST method, which ensures that we can't do them via a 3rd-party website.

Credits

We would like to thank @zpbrent for reporting this issue through huntr.dev.

Reference: https://huntr.dev/bounties/4ee0ef74-e4d4-46e7-a05c-076bce522299/

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.6.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "wallabag/wallabag"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0-alpha.1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.6.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-4454"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-21T20:28:06Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "# Description\n\nwallabag was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) which allows attackers to arbitrarily reset annotations, entries and tags, by the GET request to `/reset/annotations`, `/reset/entries`, `/reset/tags`, `/reset/archived`.\n\nThis vulnerability has a CVSSv3.1 score of 4.3.\n\n**You should immediately patch your instance to version 2.6.3 or higher if you have more than one user and/or having open registration**.\n\n# Resolution\n\nThese actions are now doable only via POST method, which ensures that we can\u0027t do them via a 3rd-party website. \n\n# Credits \n\nWe would like to thank @zpbrent for reporting this issue through huntr.dev.\n\nReference: https://huntr.dev/bounties/4ee0ef74-e4d4-46e7-a05c-076bce522299/",
  "id": "GHSA-p8gp-899c-jvq9",
  "modified": "2023-08-24T21:48:12Z",
  "published": "2023-08-21T20:28:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wallabag/wallabag/security/advisories/GHSA-p8gp-899c-jvq9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wallabag/wallabag/commit/78b0b55c40511e1f22d5bbb4897aa10fca68441c"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/wallabag/wallabag"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/4ee0ef74-e4d4-46e7-a05c-076bce522299"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Wallabag user can reset data unintentionally "
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…