ghsa-pr52-v39m-xpvv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-03 15:30
Modified
2024-06-03 18:53
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: brcmstb: pm-arm: Fix refcount leak and __iomem leak bugs
In brcmstb_pm_probe(), there are two kinds of leak bugs:
(1) we need to add of_node_put() when for_each__matching_node() breaks (2) we need to add iounmap() for each iomap in fail path
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-48693" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-401" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-03T15:15:07Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsoc: brcmstb: pm-arm: Fix refcount leak and __iomem leak bugs\n\nIn brcmstb_pm_probe(), there are two kinds of leak bugs:\n\n(1) we need to add of_node_put() when for_each__matching_node() breaks\n(2) we need to add iounmap() for each iomap in fail path", "id": "GHSA-pr52-v39m-xpvv", "modified": "2024-06-03T18:53:46Z", "published": "2024-05-03T15:30:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48693" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0284b4e6dec6088a41607aa3f42bf51edff01883" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1085f5080647f0c9f357c270a537869191f7f2a1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/43245c77d9efd8c9eb91bf225d07954dcf32204d" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57b2897ec3ffe4cbe018446be6d04432919dca6b" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/653500b400d5576940b7429690f7197199ddcc82" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6dc0251638a4a1a998506dbd4627f8317e907558" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.