ghsa-prcq-9p67-4w6h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-28 12:30
Modified
2024-07-03 18:37
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: SOF: Add some bounds checking to firmware data
Smatch complains about "head->full_size - head->header_size" can underflow. To some extent, we're always going to have to trust the firmware a bit. However, it's easy enough to add a check for negatives, and let's add a upper bounds check as well.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-26927" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-28T12:15:21Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nASoC: SOF: Add some bounds checking to firmware data\n\nSmatch complains about \"head-\u003efull_size - head-\u003eheader_size\" can\nunderflow. To some extent, we\u0027re always going to have to trust the\nfirmware a bit. However, it\u0027s easy enough to add a check for negatives,\nand let\u0027s add a upper bounds check as well.", "id": "GHSA-prcq-9p67-4w6h", "modified": "2024-07-03T18:37:10Z", "published": "2024-04-28T12:30:28Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26927" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/044e220667157fb9d59320341badec59cf45ba48" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98f681b0f84cfc3a1d83287b77697679e0398306" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9eeb8e1231f6450c574c1db979122e171a1813ab" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ced7df8b3c5c4751244cad79011e86cf1f809153" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d133d67e7e724102d1e53009c4f88afaaf3e167c" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.