GHSA-QGGQ-GW32-WCQ3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-26 18:32 – Updated: 2025-03-17 15:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix operation precedence bug in port timestamping napi_poll context
Indirection (*) is of lower precedence than postfix increment (++). Logic in napi_poll context would cause an out-of-bound read by first increment the pointer address by byte address space and then dereference the value. Rather, the intended logic was to dereference first and then increment the underlying value.
Severity ?
7.1 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52626"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-125"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-26T18:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5e: Fix operation precedence bug in port timestamping napi_poll context\n\nIndirection (*) is of lower precedence than postfix increment (++). Logic\nin napi_poll context would cause an out-of-bound read by first increment\nthe pointer address by byte address space and then dereference the value.\nRather, the intended logic was to dereference first and then increment the\nunderlying value.",
"id": "GHSA-qggq-gw32-wcq3",
"modified": "2025-03-17T15:31:36Z",
"published": "2024-03-26T18:32:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52626"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33cdeae8c6fb58cc445f859b67c014dc9f60b4e0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3876638b2c7ebb2c9d181de1191db0de8cac143a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40e0d0746390c5b0c31144f4f1688d72f3f8d790"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…