ghsa-x58g-pgf5-4jp7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-19 09:34
Modified
2024-06-26 00:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

of: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals

In the following sequence: 1) of_platform_depopulate() 2) of_overlay_remove()

During the step 1, devices are destroyed and devlinks are removed. During the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but __of_changeset_entry_destroy() can raise warnings related to missing of_node_put(): ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...

Indeed, during the devlink removals performed at step 1, the removal itself releasing the device (and the attached of_node) is done by a job queued in a workqueue and so, it is done asynchronously with respect to function calls. When the warning is present, of_node_put() will be called but wrongly too late from the workqueue job.

In order to be sure that any ongoing devlink removals are done before the of_node destruction, synchronize the of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-35879"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-19T09:15:09Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nof: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals\n\nIn the following sequence:\n  1) of_platform_depopulate()\n  2) of_overlay_remove()\n\nDuring the step 1, devices are destroyed and devlinks are removed.\nDuring the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but\n__of_changeset_entry_destroy() can raise warnings related to missing\nof_node_put():\n  ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...\n\nIndeed, during the devlink removals performed at step 1, the removal\nitself releasing the device (and the attached of_node) is done by a job\nqueued in a workqueue and so, it is done asynchronously with respect to\nfunction calls.\nWhen the warning is present, of_node_put() will be called but wrongly\ntoo late from the workqueue job.\n\nIn order to be sure that any ongoing devlink removals are done before\nthe of_node destruction, synchronize the of_changeset_destroy() with the\ndevlink removals.",
  "id": "GHSA-x58g-pgf5-4jp7",
  "modified": "2024-06-26T00:31:43Z",
  "published": "2024-05-19T09:34:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35879"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3127b2ee50c424a96eb3559fbb7b43cf0b111c7a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3ee2424107546d882e1ddd75333ca9c32879908c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7b6df050c45a1ea158fd50bc32a8e1447dd1e951"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/801c8b8ec5bfb3519566dff16a5ecd48302fca82"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8917e7385346bd6584890ed362985c219fe6ae84"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae6d76e4f06c37a623e357e79d49b17411db6f5c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00017.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.