ghsa-xchq-w5r3-4wg3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-25 19:53
Modified
2024-06-18 15:01
Summary
vyper performs incorrect topic logging in raw_log
Details

Summary

Incorrect values can be logged when raw_log builtin is called with memory or storage arguments to be used as topics.

A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. In particular, no uses of raw_log() were found at all in production; it is apparently not a well-known function.

Details

The build_IR function of the RawLog class fails to properly unwrap the variables provided as topics. Consequently, incorrect values are logged as topics.

PoC

```vyper x: bytes32

@external def f(): self.x = 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234 raw_log([self.x], b"") # LOG1(offset:0x60, size:0x00, topic1:0x00)

y: bytes32 = 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
raw_log([y], b"") # LOG1(offset:0x80, size:0x00, topic1:0x40)

```

Patches

Fixed in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3977.

Impact

Incorrect values can be logged which may result in unexpected behavior in client-side applications relying on these logs.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "vyper"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.4.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-32645"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-25T19:53:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-25T18:15:08Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nIncorrect values can be logged when `raw_log` builtin is called with memory or storage arguments to be used as topics.\n\nA contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. In particular, no uses of `raw_log()` were found at all in production; it is apparently not a well-known function.\n\n### Details\nThe `build_IR` function of the `RawLog` class fails to properly unwrap the variables provided as topics. Consequently, incorrect values are logged as topics.\n\n### PoC\n```vyper\nx: bytes32\n\n@external\ndef f():\n    self.x = 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234\n    raw_log([self.x], b\"\") # LOG1(offset:0x60, size:0x00, topic1:0x00)\n\n    y: bytes32 = 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234\n    raw_log([y], b\"\") # LOG1(offset:0x80, size:0x00, topic1:0x40)\n```\n### Patches\nFixed in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3977.\n\n### Impact\nIncorrect values can be logged which may result in unexpected behavior in client-side applications relying on these logs.\n",
  "id": "GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3",
  "modified": "2024-06-18T15:01:23Z",
  "published": "2024-04-25T19:53:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xchq-w5r3-4wg3"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-32645"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "vyper performs incorrect topic logging in raw_log"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.