GSD-2016-8629
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21Details
Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2016-8629",
"description": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm.",
"id": "GSD-2016-8629",
"references": [
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0876",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-8629"
],
"details": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm.",
"id": "GSD-2016-8629",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:22.798189Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2017-04-04T00:00:00",
"ID": "CVE-2016-8629",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Keycloak",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "2.4.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Red Hat, Inc."
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-284"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:0876",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0876.html"
},
{
"name": "1038180",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038180"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988"
},
{
"name": "97392",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97392"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:0873",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:0872",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872"
}
]
}
},
"gitlab.com": {
"advisories": [
{
"affected_range": "(,2.4.0)",
"affected_versions": "All versions before 2.4.0",
"cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P",
"cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-264",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2021-01-08",
"description": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm.",
"fixed_versions": [
"2.4.0"
],
"identifier": "CVE-2016-8629",
"identifiers": [
"GHSA-778x-2mqv-w6xw",
"CVE-2016-8629"
],
"not_impacted": "All versions starting from 2.4.0",
"package_slug": "maven/org.keycloak/keycloak-core",
"pubdate": "2018-10-18",
"solution": "Upgrade to version 2.4.0 or above.",
"title": "Moderate severity vulnerability that affects org.keycloak:keycloak-core",
"urls": [
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8629",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873",
"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988",
"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-778x-2mqv-w6xw",
"http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0876.html",
"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97392",
"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038180"
],
"uuid": "ce38d41c-9fde-44d2-bfd9-bc87cf98bf37"
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "2.4.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign_on:7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign_on:7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"cpe_match": [],
"operator": "AND"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2016-8629"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-264"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:0873",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:0872",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872"
},
{
"name": "1038180",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038180"
},
{
"name": "97392",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97392"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2017:0876",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0876.html"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2019-10-09T23:20Z",
"publishedDate": "2018-03-12T15:29Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…