gsd-2016-8629
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2016-8629", "description": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm.", "id": "GSD-2016-8629", "references": [ "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0876", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-8629" ], "details": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm.", "id": "GSD-2016-8629", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:22.798189Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "DATE_PUBLIC": "2017-04-04T00:00:00", "ID": "CVE-2016-8629", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Keycloak", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "2.4.0" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Red Hat, Inc." } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-284" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "RHSA-2017:0876", "refsource": "REDHAT", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0876.html" }, { "name": "1038180", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038180" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988" }, { "name": "97392", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97392" }, { "name": "RHSA-2017:0873", "refsource": "REDHAT", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873" }, { "name": "RHSA-2017:0872", "refsource": "REDHAT", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872" } ] } }, "gitlab.com": { "advisories": [ { "affected_range": "(,2.4.0)", "affected_versions": "All versions before 2.4.0", "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P", "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-1035", "CWE-264", "CWE-937" ], "date": "2021-01-08", "description": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm.", "fixed_versions": [ "2.4.0" ], "identifier": "CVE-2016-8629", "identifiers": [ "GHSA-778x-2mqv-w6xw", "CVE-2016-8629" ], "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 2.4.0", "package_slug": "maven/org.keycloak/keycloak-core", "pubdate": "2018-10-18", "solution": "Upgrade to version 2.4.0 or above.", "title": "Moderate severity vulnerability that affects org.keycloak:keycloak-core", "urls": [ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-8629", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873", "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988", "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-778x-2mqv-w6xw", "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0876.html", "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97392", "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038180" ], "uuid": "ce38d41c-9fde-44d2-bfd9-bc87cf98bf37" } ] }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "2.4.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" }, { "children": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign_on:7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign_on:7.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" }, { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": false }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": false } ], "operator": "OR" } ], "cpe_match": [], "operator": "AND" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2016-8629" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-264" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988" }, { "name": "RHSA-2017:0873", "refsource": "REDHAT", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873" }, { "name": "RHSA-2017:0872", "refsource": "REDHAT", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872" }, { "name": "1038180", "refsource": "SECTRACK", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038180" }, { "name": "97392", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97392" }, { "name": "RHSA-2017:0876", "refsource": "REDHAT", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0876.html" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "SINGLE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 5.5, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.0, "impactScore": 4.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 3.6 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2019-10-09T23:20Z", "publishedDate": "2018-03-12T15:29Z" } } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.