gsd-2018-5389
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:22
Details
The Internet Key Exchange v1 main mode is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. Reusing a key pair across different versions and modes of IKE could lead to cross-protocol authentication bypasses. It is well known, that the aggressive mode of IKEv1 PSK is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. For the main mode, however, only an online attack against PSK authentication was thought to be feasible. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to recover a weak Pre-Shared Key or enable the impersonation of a victim host or network.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2018-5389", "description": "The Internet Key Exchange v1 main mode is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. Reusing a key pair across different versions and modes of IKE could lead to cross-protocol authentication bypasses. It is well known, that the aggressive mode of IKEv1 PSK is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. For the main mode, however, only an online attack against PSK authentication was thought to be feasible. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to recover a weak Pre-Shared Key or enable the impersonation of a victim host or network.", "id": "GSD-2018-5389", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5389.html" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-5389" ], "details": "The Internet Key Exchange v1 main mode is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. Reusing a key pair across different versions and modes of IKE could lead to cross-protocol authentication bypasses. It is well known, that the aggressive mode of IKEv1 PSK is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. For the main mode, however, only an online attack against PSK authentication was thought to be feasible. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to recover a weak Pre-Shared Key or enable the impersonation of a victim host or network.", "id": "GSD-2018-5389", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:40.044618Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org", "ID": "CVE-2018-5389", "STATE": "PUBLIC", "TITLE": "Internet Key Exchange v1 main mode is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Internet Key Exchange Protocol", "version": { "version_data": [ { "affected": "=", "version_name": "Version 1", "version_value": "Version 1 Main Mode" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Internet Engineering Task Force" } ] } }, "credit": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Thanks to Martin Grothe, Joerg Schwenk, and Dennis Felsch of the Ruhr-University Bochum, and Adam Czubak and Marcin Szymanek of the University of Opole for reporting this vulnerability." } ], "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "The Internet Key Exchange v1 main mode is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. Reusing a key pair across different versions and modes of IKE could lead to cross-protocol authentication bypasses. It is well known, that the aggressive mode of IKEv1 PSK is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. For the main mode, however, only an online attack against PSK authentication was thought to be feasible. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to recover a weak Pre-Shared Key or enable the impersonation of a victim host or network." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-323" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2018/08/practical-dictionary-attack-on-ipsec-ike.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2018/08/practical-dictionary-attack-on-ipsec-ike.html" }, { "name": "VU#857035", "refsource": "CERT-VN", "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/857035" }, { "name": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-felsch.pdf", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-felsch.pdf" }, { "name": "https://blogs.cisco.com/security/great-cipher-but-where-did-you-get-that-key", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://blogs.cisco.com/security/great-cipher-but-where-did-you-get-that-key" } ] }, "source": { "discovery": "UNKNOWN" } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:ietf:internet_key_exchange:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org", "ID": "CVE-2018-5389" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "The Internet Key Exchange v1 main mode is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. Reusing a key pair across different versions and modes of IKE could lead to cross-protocol authentication bypasses. It is well known, that the aggressive mode of IKEv1 PSK is vulnerable to offline dictionary or brute force attacks. For the main mode, however, only an online attack against PSK authentication was thought to be feasible. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to recover a weak Pre-Shared Key or enable the impersonation of a victim host or network." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-521" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-felsch.pdf", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-felsch.pdf" }, { "name": "VU#857035", "refsource": "CERT-VN", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory", "US Government Resource" ], "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/857035" }, { "name": "https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2018/08/practical-dictionary-attack-on-ipsec-ike.html", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2018/08/practical-dictionary-attack-on-ipsec-ike.html" }, { "name": "https://blogs.cisco.com/security/great-cipher-but-where-did-you-get-that-key", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://blogs.cisco.com/security/great-cipher-but-where-did-you-get-that-key" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 4.3, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.9, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "version": "3.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 2.2, "impactScore": 3.6 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2019-10-09T23:41Z", "publishedDate": "2018-09-06T21:29Z" } } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.