gsd-2020-15106
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2020-15106


To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2020-15106",
    "description": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL.",
    "id": "GSD-2020-15106",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-15106.html",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2438",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1407",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0916",
      "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2020-15106"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2020-15106"
      ],
      "details": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL.",
      "id": "GSD-2020-15106",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:43.688918Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2020-15106",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": "Improper Input Validation in etcd"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "etcd",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "\u003c 3.3.23"
                        },
                        {
                          "version_value": "\u003c 3.4.10"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "etcd-io"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        }
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2020-cd43b84c16",
            "refsource": "FEDORA",
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP/"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003cv3.4.10",
          "affected_versions": "All versions before 3.4.10",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2023-02-07",
          "description": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "v3.4.10"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2020-15106",
          "identifiers": [
            "GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2",
            "CVE-2020-15106"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 3.4.10",
          "package_slug": "go/github.com/etcd-io/etcd/wal",
          "pubdate": "2023-02-07",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 3.4.10 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Input Validation in etcd",
          "urls": [
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2",
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15106",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/11793",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/4571e528f49625d3de3170f219a45c3b3d38c675",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/f4b650b51dc4a53a8700700dc12e1242ac56ba07",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/SECURITY_AUDIT.pdf",
            "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP/",
            "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2020-0005",
            "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2"
          ],
          "uuid": "7f0c3b97-f847-452e-bfbd-2d7cd9ab2b32",
          "versions": [
            {
              "commit": {
                "sha": "33abd526eb9d5a0114ccfdda0d9033a7cab54018",
                "tags": [
                  "v3.4.10"
                ],
                "timestamp": "20200716221620"
              },
              "number": "v3.4.10"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003c0.5.0-alpha.5.0.20200423152442-f4b650b51dc4",
          "affected_versions": "All versions before 0.5.0-alpha.5.0.20200423152442-f4b650b51dc4",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2023-02-07",
          "description": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "0.5.0-alpha.5.0.20200423152442-f4b650b51dc4"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2020-15106",
          "identifiers": [
            "GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2",
            "CVE-2020-15106"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 0.5.0-alpha.5.0.20200423152442-f4b650b51dc4",
          "package_slug": "go/go.etcd.io/etcd",
          "pubdate": "2023-02-07",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 0.5.0-alpha.5.0.20200423152442-f4b650b51dc4 or above. *Note*: 0.5.0-alpha.5.0.20200423152442-f4b650b51dc4 may be an unstable version. Use caution.",
          "title": "Improper Input Validation in etcd",
          "urls": [
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2",
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15106",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/11793",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/4571e528f49625d3de3170f219a45c3b3d38c675",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/f4b650b51dc4a53a8700700dc12e1242ac56ba07",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/SECURITY_AUDIT.pdf",
            "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP/",
            "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2020-0005",
            "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2"
          ],
          "uuid": "43f257f0-17e0-4d55-9df9-6bac8293168b"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:etcd:etcd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "3.3.23",
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:etcd:etcd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "3.4.10",
                "versionStartIncluding": "3.4.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          },
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:32:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-15106"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, a large slice causes panic in decodeRecord method. The size of a record is stored in the length field of a WAL file and no additional validation is done on this data. Therefore, it is possible to forge an extremely large frame size that can unintentionally panic at the expense of any RAFT participant trying to decode the WAL."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "NVD-CWE-Other"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-p4g4-wgrh-qrg2"
            },
            {
              "name": "FEDORA-2020-cd43b84c16",
              "refsource": "FEDORA",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP/"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "SINGLE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 4.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2021-11-18T18:30Z",
      "publishedDate": "2020-08-05T19:15Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.