gsd-2021-47214
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-04-11 05:05
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd error
Currently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we
bail out using "goto out_release_unlock;" in the cases where idx >=
size, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page
== false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error(). In this case I see
restore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following
call to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h->resv_hugepages
causing a 100% reproducible leak.
We should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the
pagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is
no reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call
restore_reserve_on_error(). Rename new_pagecache_page to
page_in_pagecache to make that clear.
Aliases
{ "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-47214" ], "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd error\n\nCurrently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we\nbail out using \"goto out_release_unlock;\" in the cases where idx \u003e=\nsize, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page\n== false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error(). In this case I see\nrestore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following\ncall to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h-\u003eresv_hugepages\ncausing a 100% reproducible leak.\n\nWe should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the\npagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is\nno reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call\nrestore_reserve_on_error(). Rename new_pagecache_page to\npage_in_pagecache to make that clear.", "id": "GSD-2021-47214", "modified": "2024-04-11T05:05:09.682284Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org", "ID": "CVE-2021-47214", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Linux", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "c7b1850dfb41", "version_value": "b5069d44e2fb" }, { "version_value": "not down converted", "x_cve_json_5_version_data": { "defaultStatus": "affected", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "5.14" }, { "lessThan": "5.14", "status": "unaffected", "version": "0", "versionType": "custom" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "5.15.5", "versionType": "custom" }, { "lessThanOrEqual": "*", "status": "unaffected", "version": "5.16", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix" } ] } } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Linux" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd error\n\nCurrently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we\nbail out using \"goto out_release_unlock;\" in the cases where idx \u003e=\nsize, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page\n== false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error(). In this case I see\nrestore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following\ncall to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h-\u003eresv_hugepages\ncausing a 100% reproducible leak.\n\nWe should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the\npagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is\nno reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call\nrestore_reserve_on_error(). Rename new_pagecache_page to\npage_in_pagecache to make that clear." } ] }, "generator": { "engine": "bippy-d175d3acf727" }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5069d44e2fbc4a9093d005b3ef0949add3dd27e", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5069d44e2fbc4a9093d005b3ef0949add3dd27e" }, { "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc30042df6fcc82ea18acf0dace831503e60a0b7", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc30042df6fcc82ea18acf0dace831503e60a0b7" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "cve": { "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd error\n\nCurrently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we\nbail out using \"goto out_release_unlock;\" in the cases where idx \u003e=\nsize, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page\n== false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error(). In this case I see\nrestore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following\ncall to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h-\u003eresv_hugepages\ncausing a 100% reproducible leak.\n\nWe should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the\npagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is\nno reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call\nrestore_reserve_on_error(). Rename new_pagecache_page to\npage_in_pagecache to make that clear." } ], "id": "CVE-2021-47214", "lastModified": "2024-04-10T19:49:51.183", "metrics": {}, "published": "2024-04-10T19:15:48.680", "references": [ { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5069d44e2fbc4a9093d005b3ef0949add3dd27e" }, { "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc30042df6fcc82ea18acf0dace831503e60a0b7" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis" } } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.