gsd-2023-0465
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be
vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.
Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by
OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.
A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies
in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.
Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing
the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the
`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2023-0465", "id": "GSD-2023-0465" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-0465" ], "details": "Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0027 argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0027 function.", "id": "GSD-2023-0465", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:23.057513Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "ID": "CVE-2023-0465", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "OpenSSL", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "3.1.0", "version_value": "3.1.1" }, { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "3.0.0", "version_value": "3.0.9" }, { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "1.1.1", "version_value": "1.1.1u" }, { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "1.0.2", "version_value": "1.0.2zh" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "OpenSSL" } ] } }, "credits": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "David Benjamin (Google)" }, { "lang": "en", "value": "Matt Caswell" } ], "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0027 argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0027 function." } ] }, "generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev" }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "improper certificate validation" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt" }, { "name": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c" }, { "name": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb" }, { "name": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95" }, { "name": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=10325176f3d3e98c6e2b3bf5ab1e3b334de6947a", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=10325176f3d3e98c6e2b3bf5ab1e3b334de6947a" }, { "name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/" }, { "name": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417" }, { "name": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html" }, { "name": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08" } ] }, "source": { "discovery": "UNKNOWN" } }, "gitlab.com": { "advisories": [ { "affected_range": "\u003e=1.0.2 \u003c1.0.2zh||\u003e=1.1.1 \u003c1.1.1u||\u003e=3.0.0 \u003c3.0.9||\u003e=3.1.0 \u003c3.1.1", "affected_versions": "All versions starting from 1.0.2 before 1.0.2zh, all versions starting from 1.1.1 before 1.1.1u, all versions starting from 3.0.0 before 3.0.9, all versions starting from 3.1.0 before 3.1.1", "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-1035", "CWE-295", "CWE-937" ], "date": "2023-06-08", "description": "Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy\u0027 argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0027 function.", "fixed_versions": [ "1.1.0l", "1.1.1u", "3.0.9", "3.1.1" ], "identifier": "CVE-2023-0465", "identifiers": [ "CVE-2023-0465" ], "not_impacted": "All versions before 1.0.2, all versions starting from 1.0.2zh before 1.1.1, all versions starting from 1.1.1u before 3.0.0, all versions starting from 3.0.9 before 3.1.0, all versions starting from 3.1.1", "package_slug": "conan/openssl", "pubdate": "2023-03-28", "solution": "Upgrade to versions 1.1.0l, 1.1.1u, 3.0.9, 3.1.1 or above.", "title": "Improper Certificate Validation", "urls": [ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0465", "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c", "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb", "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95", "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=10325176f3d3e98c6e2b3bf5ab1e3b334de6947a", "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt" ], "uuid": "87ac7083-eabc-4544-862a-b6d9facd4577" } ] }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "cve": { "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "23F912E9-9126-4D16-8F77-BD41CED6774D", "versionEndExcluding": "1.0.2zh", "versionStartIncluding": "1.0.2", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "7D99C2F8-BE74-4912-8653-A2AEE387AAF9", "versionEndExcluding": "1.1.1u", "versionStartIncluding": "1.1.1", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "4C637E94-F5EC-4D4B-836F-8C8219F1ECEC", "versionEndExcluding": "3.0.9", "versionStartIncluding": "3.0.0", "vulnerable": true }, { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "68821BE0-7889-48B0-888D-CEC8BB9BDEA9", "versionEndExcluding": "3.1.1", "versionStartIncluding": "3.1.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0027 argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0027 function." } ], "id": "CVE-2023-0465", "lastModified": "2024-02-04T09:15:09.430", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.3, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 1.4, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2023-03-28T15:15:06.820", "references": [ { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "tags": [ "Broken Link" ], "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=10325176f3d3e98c6e2b3bf5ab1e3b334de6947a" }, { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb" }, { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95" }, { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Patch" ], "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c" }, { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html" }, { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08" }, { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/" }, { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417" }, { "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-295" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] } } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.