gsd-2023-30590
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
The generateKeys() API function returned from crypto.createDiffieHellman() only generates missing (or outdated) keys, that is, it only generates a private key if none has been set yet, but the function is also needed to compute the corresponding public key after calling setPrivateKey(). However, the documentation says this API call: "Generates private and public Diffie-Hellman key values".
The documented behavior is very different from the actual behavior, and this difference could easily lead to security issues in applications that use these APIs as the DiffieHellman may be used as the basis for application-level security, implications are consequently broad.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2023-30590", id: "GSD-2023-30590", }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2023-30590", ], details: "The generateKeys() API function returned from crypto.createDiffieHellman() only generates missing (or outdated) keys, that is, it only generates a private key if none has been set yet, but the function is also needed to compute the corresponding public key after calling setPrivateKey(). However, the documentation says this API call: \"Generates private and public Diffie-Hellman key values\".\n\nThe documented behavior is very different from the actual behavior, and this difference could easily lead to security issues in applications that use these APIs as the DiffieHellman may be used as the basis for application-level security, implications are consequently broad.", id: "GSD-2023-30590", modified: "2023-12-13T01:20:51.863453Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "support@hackerone.com", ID: "CVE-2023-30590", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "Node.js", version: { version_data: [ { version_affected: "<", version_name: "16.20.1", version_value: "16.20.1", }, { version_affected: "<", version_name: "18.16.1", version_value: "18.16.1", }, { version_affected: "<", version_name: "20.3.1", version_value: "20.3.1", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "Node.js", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "The generateKeys() API function returned from crypto.createDiffieHellman() only generates missing (or outdated) keys, that is, it only generates a private key if none has been set yet, but the function is also needed to compute the corresponding public key after calling setPrivateKey(). However, the documentation says this API call: \"Generates private and public Diffie-Hellman key values\".\n\nThe documented behavior is very different from the actual behavior, and this difference could easily lead to security issues in applications that use these APIs as the DiffieHellman may be used as the basis for application-level security, implications are consequently broad.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/june-2023-security-releases", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/june-2023-security-releases", }, { name: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/03/msg00029.html", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/03/msg00029.html", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { cve: { configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "7E7F6F9A-AF9F-453B-870D-1E8759567F29", versionEndExcluding: "16.20.1", versionStartIncluding: "16.0.0", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "3AA02CEF-5AC5-46F7-94DE-D9EA15678AE7", versionEndExcluding: "18.16.1", versionStartIncluding: "18.0.0", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "1CAA23E6-4930-4326-9CB0-AEE5013BFD37", versionEndExcluding: "20.3.1", versionStartIncluding: "20.0.0", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "The generateKeys() API function returned from crypto.createDiffieHellman() only generates missing (or outdated) keys, that is, it only generates a private key if none has been set yet, but the function is also needed to compute the corresponding public key after calling setPrivateKey(). However, the documentation says this API call: \"Generates private and public Diffie-Hellman key values\".\n\nThe documented behavior is very different from the actual behavior, and this difference could easily lead to security issues in applications that use these APIs as the DiffieHellman may be used as the basis for application-level security, implications are consequently broad.", }, { lang: "es", value: "La función API generateKeys() devuelta por crypto.createDiffieHellman() solo genera claves faltantes (o desactualizadas), es decir, solo genera una clave privada si aún no se ha configurado ninguna, pero la función también es necesaria para calcular la clave pública correspondiente. después de llamar a setPrivateKey(). Sin embargo, la documentación dice que esta llamada API: \"Genera valores de clave Diffie-Hellman públicos y privados\". El comportamiento documentado es muy diferente del comportamiento real, y esta diferencia podría conducir fácilmente a problemas de seguridad en las aplicaciones que utilizan estas API, ya que DiffieHellman puede usarse como base para la seguridad a nivel de aplicación; en consecuencia, las implicaciones son amplias.", }, ], id: "CVE-2023-30590", lastModified: "2024-03-27T03:15:10.130", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 7.5, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 3.6, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2023-11-28T20:15:07.480", references: [ { source: "support@hackerone.com", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/03/msg00029.html", }, { source: "support@hackerone.com", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/june-2023-security-releases", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "support@hackerone.com", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "NVD-CWE-Other", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.