gsd-2023-52592
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-03-03 06:01
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libbpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_object__collect_prog_relos An issue occurred while reading an ELF file in libbpf.c during fuzzing: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 4206 in libbpf.c (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206 #1 0x000000000094f9d6 in bpf_object.collect_relos () at libbpf.c:6706 #2 0x000000000092bef3 in bpf_object_open () at libbpf.c:7437 #3 0x000000000092c046 in bpf_object.open_mem () at libbpf.c:7497 #4 0x0000000000924afa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput () at fuzz/bpf-object-fuzzer.c:16 #5 0x000000000060be11 in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::Fuzzer::run_one () #6 0x000000000087ad92 in tracing::span::Span::in_scope () #7 0x00000000006078aa in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::util::walkdir () #8 0x00000000005f3217 in testblitz_engine::entrypoint::main::{{closure}} () #9 0x00000000005f2601 in main () (gdb) scn_data was null at this code(tools/lib/bpf/src/libbpf.c): if (rel->r_offset % BPF_INSN_SZ || rel->r_offset >= scn_data->d_size) { The scn_data is derived from the code above: scn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, sec_idx); scn_data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn); relo_sec_name = elf_sec_str(obj, shdr->sh_name); sec_name = elf_sec_name(obj, scn); if (!relo_sec_name || !sec_name)// don't check whether scn_data is NULL return -EINVAL; In certain special scenarios, such as reading a malformed ELF file, it is possible that scn_data may be a null pointer
Aliases


To clipboard 

{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2023-52592"
      ],
      "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlibbpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_object__collect_prog_relos\n\nAn issue occurred while reading an ELF file in libbpf.c during fuzzing:\n\n\tProgram received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.\n\t0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206\n\t4206 in libbpf.c\n\t(gdb) bt\n\t#0 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206\n\t#1 0x000000000094f9d6 in bpf_object.collect_relos () at libbpf.c:6706\n\t#2 0x000000000092bef3 in bpf_object_open () at libbpf.c:7437\n\t#3 0x000000000092c046 in bpf_object.open_mem () at libbpf.c:7497\n\t#4 0x0000000000924afa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput () at fuzz/bpf-object-fuzzer.c:16\n\t#5 0x000000000060be11 in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::Fuzzer::run_one ()\n\t#6 0x000000000087ad92 in tracing::span::Span::in_scope ()\n\t#7 0x00000000006078aa in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::util::walkdir ()\n\t#8 0x00000000005f3217 in testblitz_engine::entrypoint::main::{{closure}} ()\n\t#9 0x00000000005f2601 in main ()\n\t(gdb)\n\nscn_data was null at this code(tools/lib/bpf/src/libbpf.c):\n\n\tif (rel-\u003er_offset % BPF_INSN_SZ || rel-\u003er_offset \u003e= scn_data-\u003ed_size) {\n\nThe scn_data is derived from the code above:\n\n\tscn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, sec_idx);\n\tscn_data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn);\n\n\trelo_sec_name = elf_sec_str(obj, shdr-\u003esh_name);\n\tsec_name = elf_sec_name(obj, scn);\n\tif (!relo_sec_name || !sec_name)// don\u0027t check whether scn_data is NULL\n\t\treturn -EINVAL;\n\nIn certain special scenarios, such as reading a malformed ELF file,\nit is possible that scn_data may be a null pointer",
      "id": "GSD-2023-52592",
      "modified": "2024-03-03T06:01:51.551344Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2023-52592",
        "STATE": "REJECT"
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "** REJECT ** This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority."
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2023-52592",
        "lastModified": "2024-03-07T21:15:07.620",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-03-06T07:15:08.733",
        "references": [],
        "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.