gsd-2024-0436
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-01-12 06:02
Details
Theoretically, it would be possible for an attacker to brute-force the password for an instance in single-user password protection mode via a timing attack given the linear nature of the `!==` used for comparison. The risk is minified by the additional overhead of the request, which varies in a non-constant nature making the attack less reliable to execute
Aliases



{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2024-0436"
      ],
      "details": "Theoretically, it would be possible for an attacker to brute-force the password for an instance in single-user password protection mode via a timing attack given the linear nature of the `!==` used for comparison.\n\nThe risk is minified by the additional overhead of the request, which varies in a non-constant nature making the attack less reliable to execute ",
      "id": "GSD-2024-0436",
      "modified": "2024-01-12T06:02:16.882233Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security@huntr.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2024-0436",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "mintplex-labs/anything-llm",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c",
                          "version_name": "unspecified",
                          "version_value": "1.0.0"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "mintplex-labs"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Theoretically, it would be possible for an attacker to brute-force the password for an instance in single-user password protection mode via a timing attack given the linear nature of the `!==` used for comparison.\n\nThe risk is minified by the additional overhead of the request, which varies in a non-constant nature making the attack less reliable to execute "
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": [
          {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-764",
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-764 Multiple Locks of a Critical Resource"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3e73cb96-c038-46a1-81b7-4d2215b36268",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3e73cb96-c038-46a1-81b7-4d2215b36268"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/mintplex-labs/anything-llm/commit/3c859ba3038121b67fb98e87dc52617fa27cbef0",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/mintplex-labs/anything-llm/commit/3c859ba3038121b67fb98e87dc52617fa27cbef0"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "advisory": "3e73cb96-c038-46a1-81b7-4d2215b36268",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Theoretically, it would be possible for an attacker to brute-force the password for an instance in single-user password protection mode via a timing attack given the linear nature of the `!==` used for comparison.\n\nThe risk is minified by the additional overhead of the request, which varies in a non-constant nature making the attack less reliable to execute "
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-0436",
        "lastModified": "2024-02-26T16:32:25.577",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV30": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 7.1,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "LOW",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
                "version": "3.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 4.2,
              "source": "security@huntr.dev",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2024-02-26T16:27:50.283",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security@huntr.dev",
            "url": "https://github.com/mintplex-labs/anything-llm/commit/3c859ba3038121b67fb98e87dc52617fa27cbef0"
          },
          {
            "source": "security@huntr.dev",
            "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/3e73cb96-c038-46a1-81b7-4d2215b36268"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security@huntr.dev",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-764"
              }
            ],
            "source": "security@huntr.dev",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.