gsd-2024-26658
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-02-20 06:02
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bcachefs: grab s_umount only if snapshotting When I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression, there is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume. $ cat test.sh prog=bcachefs $prog subvolume create /mnt/data $prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots while true;do $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s) sleep 1s done $ cat /etc/mongodb.conf systemLog: destination: file logAppend: true path: /mnt/data/mongod.log storage: dbPath: /mnt/data/ lockdep reports: [ 3437.452330] ====================================================== [ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G E [ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.454875] but task is already holding lock: [ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.456009] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3437.456553] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3437.457054] -> #3 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}: [ 3437.457507] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.457772] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.458206] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.458498] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.458779] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.459155] -> #2 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3437.459615] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.459878] bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460276] bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460686] notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0 [ 3437.461283] do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0 [ 3437.461555] path_openat+0xa57/0xce0 [ 3437.461836] do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160 [ 3437.462116] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0 [ 3437.462402] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 3437.462701] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.462982] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.463359] -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3437.463843] down_write+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3437.464223] bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.464493] vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0 [ 3437.464653] ksys_write+0x69/0xf0 [ 3437.464839] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.465009] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.465231] -> #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3437.465471] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.465656] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.465822] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.465996] filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.466175] user_path_create+0x2d/0x50 [ 3437.466352] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.466617] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.466791] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.466957] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.467180] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533: other info that might help us debug this: [ 3437.467507] Chain exists of: sb_writers#10 --> &c->snapshot_create_lock --> &type->s_umount_key#48 [ 3437.467979] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3437.468223] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3437.468405] ---- ---- [ 3437.468585] rlock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.468758] lock(&c->snapshot_create_lock); [ 3437.469030] lock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.469291] rlock(sb_writers#10); [ 3437.469434] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3437.469 ---truncated---
Aliases


To clipboard 

{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2024-26658"
      ],
      "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbcachefs: grab s_umount only if snapshotting\n\nWhen I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression,\nthere is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume.\n\n$ cat test.sh\nprog=bcachefs\n\n$prog subvolume create /mnt/data\n$prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots\n\nwhile true;do\n    $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s)\n    sleep 1s\ndone\n\n$ cat /etc/mongodb.conf\nsystemLog:\n  destination: file\n  logAppend: true\n  path: /mnt/data/mongod.log\n\nstorage:\n  dbPath: /mnt/data/\n\nlockdep reports:\n[ 3437.452330] ======================================================\n[ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n[ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G            E\n[ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------\n[ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock:\n[ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190\n[ 3437.454875]\n               but task is already holding lock:\n[ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.456009]\n               which lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n[ 3437.456553]\n               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n[ 3437.457054]\n               -\u003e #3 (\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.457507]        down_read+0x3e/0x170\n[ 3437.457772]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.458206]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0\n[ 3437.458498]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.458779]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.459155]\n               -\u003e #2 (\u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.459615]        down_read+0x3e/0x170\n[ 3437.459878]        bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.460276]        bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.460686]        notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0\n[ 3437.461283]        do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0\n[ 3437.461555]        path_openat+0xa57/0xce0\n[ 3437.461836]        do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160\n[ 3437.462116]        do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0\n[ 3437.462402]        __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0\n[ 3437.462701]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.462982]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.463359]\n               -\u003e #1 (\u0026sb-\u003es_type-\u003ei_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.463843]        down_write+0x3b/0xc0\n[ 3437.464223]        bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.464493]        vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0\n[ 3437.464653]        ksys_write+0x69/0xf0\n[ 3437.464839]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.465009]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.465231]\n               -\u003e #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}:\n[ 3437.465471]        __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0\n[ 3437.465656]        lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0\n[ 3437.465822]        mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0\n[ 3437.465996]        filename_create+0x62/0x190\n[ 3437.466175]        user_path_create+0x2d/0x50\n[ 3437.466352]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.466617]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0\n[ 3437.466791]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.466957]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.467180]\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533:\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[ 3437.467507] Chain exists of:\n                 sb_writers#10 --\u003e \u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock --\u003e \u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48\n\n[ 3437.467979]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n[ 3437.468223]        CPU0                    CPU1\n[ 3437.468405]        ----                    ----\n[ 3437.468585]   rlock(\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48);\n[ 3437.468758]                                lock(\u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock);\n[ 3437.469030]                                lock(\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48);\n[ 3437.469291]   rlock(sb_writers#10);\n[ 3437.469434]\n                *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n[ 3437.469\n---truncated---",
      "id": "GSD-2024-26658",
      "modified": "2024-02-20T06:02:29.163203Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2024-26658",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Linux",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c",
                          "version_name": "1da177e4c3f4",
                          "version_value": "5b41d3fd04c6"
                        },
                        {
                          "version_value": "not down converted",
                          "x_cve_json_5_version_data": {
                            "defaultStatus": "affected",
                            "versions": [
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "6.7.*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "6.7.5",
                                "versionType": "custom"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "6.8",
                                "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
                              }
                            ]
                          }
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Linux"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbcachefs: grab s_umount only if snapshotting\n\nWhen I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression,\nthere is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume.\n\n$ cat test.sh\nprog=bcachefs\n\n$prog subvolume create /mnt/data\n$prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots\n\nwhile true;do\n    $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s)\n    sleep 1s\ndone\n\n$ cat /etc/mongodb.conf\nsystemLog:\n  destination: file\n  logAppend: true\n  path: /mnt/data/mongod.log\n\nstorage:\n  dbPath: /mnt/data/\n\nlockdep reports:\n[ 3437.452330] ======================================================\n[ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n[ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G            E\n[ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------\n[ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock:\n[ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190\n[ 3437.454875]\n               but task is already holding lock:\n[ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.456009]\n               which lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n[ 3437.456553]\n               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n[ 3437.457054]\n               -\u003e #3 (\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.457507]        down_read+0x3e/0x170\n[ 3437.457772]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.458206]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0\n[ 3437.458498]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.458779]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.459155]\n               -\u003e #2 (\u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.459615]        down_read+0x3e/0x170\n[ 3437.459878]        bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.460276]        bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.460686]        notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0\n[ 3437.461283]        do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0\n[ 3437.461555]        path_openat+0xa57/0xce0\n[ 3437.461836]        do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160\n[ 3437.462116]        do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0\n[ 3437.462402]        __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0\n[ 3437.462701]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.462982]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.463359]\n               -\u003e #1 (\u0026sb-\u003es_type-\u003ei_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.463843]        down_write+0x3b/0xc0\n[ 3437.464223]        bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.464493]        vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0\n[ 3437.464653]        ksys_write+0x69/0xf0\n[ 3437.464839]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.465009]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.465231]\n               -\u003e #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}:\n[ 3437.465471]        __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0\n[ 3437.465656]        lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0\n[ 3437.465822]        mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0\n[ 3437.465996]        filename_create+0x62/0x190\n[ 3437.466175]        user_path_create+0x2d/0x50\n[ 3437.466352]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.466617]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0\n[ 3437.466791]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.466957]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.467180]\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533:\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[ 3437.467507] Chain exists of:\n                 sb_writers#10 --\u003e \u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock --\u003e \u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48\n\n[ 3437.467979]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n[ 3437.468223]        CPU0                    CPU1\n[ 3437.468405]        ----                    ----\n[ 3437.468585]   rlock(\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48);\n[ 3437.468758]                                lock(\u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock);\n[ 3437.469030]                                lock(\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48);\n[ 3437.469291]   rlock(sb_writers#10);\n[ 3437.469434]\n                *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n[ 3437.469\n---truncated---"
          }
        ]
      },
      "generator": {
        "engine": "bippy-b4257b672505"
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b41d3fd04c6757b9c2a60a0c5b2609cae9999df",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b41d3fd04c6757b9c2a60a0c5b2609cae9999df"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2acc59dd88d27ad69b66ded80df16c042b04eeec",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2acc59dd88d27ad69b66ded80df16c042b04eeec"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbcachefs: grab s_umount only if snapshotting\n\nWhen I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression,\nthere is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume.\n\n$ cat test.sh\nprog=bcachefs\n\n$prog subvolume create /mnt/data\n$prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots\n\nwhile true;do\n    $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s)\n    sleep 1s\ndone\n\n$ cat /etc/mongodb.conf\nsystemLog:\n  destination: file\n  logAppend: true\n  path: /mnt/data/mongod.log\n\nstorage:\n  dbPath: /mnt/data/\n\nlockdep reports:\n[ 3437.452330] ======================================================\n[ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n[ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G            E\n[ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------\n[ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock:\n[ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190\n[ 3437.454875]\n               but task is already holding lock:\n[ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.456009]\n               which lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n[ 3437.456553]\n               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n[ 3437.457054]\n               -\u003e #3 (\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.457507]        down_read+0x3e/0x170\n[ 3437.457772]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.458206]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0\n[ 3437.458498]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.458779]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.459155]\n               -\u003e #2 (\u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.459615]        down_read+0x3e/0x170\n[ 3437.459878]        bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.460276]        bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.460686]        notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0\n[ 3437.461283]        do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0\n[ 3437.461555]        path_openat+0xa57/0xce0\n[ 3437.461836]        do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160\n[ 3437.462116]        do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0\n[ 3437.462402]        __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0\n[ 3437.462701]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.462982]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.463359]\n               -\u003e #1 (\u0026sb-\u003es_type-\u003ei_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.463843]        down_write+0x3b/0xc0\n[ 3437.464223]        bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.464493]        vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0\n[ 3437.464653]        ksys_write+0x69/0xf0\n[ 3437.464839]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.465009]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.465231]\n               -\u003e #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}:\n[ 3437.465471]        __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0\n[ 3437.465656]        lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0\n[ 3437.465822]        mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0\n[ 3437.465996]        filename_create+0x62/0x190\n[ 3437.466175]        user_path_create+0x2d/0x50\n[ 3437.466352]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.466617]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0\n[ 3437.466791]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.466957]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.467180]\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533:\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[ 3437.467507] Chain exists of:\n                 sb_writers#10 --\u003e \u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock --\u003e \u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48\n\n[ 3437.467979]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n[ 3437.468223]        CPU0                    CPU1\n[ 3437.468405]        ----                    ----\n[ 3437.468585]   rlock(\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48);\n[ 3437.468758]                                lock(\u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock);\n[ 3437.469030]                                lock(\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48);\n[ 3437.469291]   rlock(sb_writers#10);\n[ 3437.469434]\n                *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n[ 3437.469\n---truncated---"
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se resolvi\u00f3 la siguiente vulnerabilidad: bcachefs: toma s_umount solo si se toma una instant\u00e1nea Cuando estaba probando mongodb sobre bcachefs con compresi\u00f3n, hay una advertencia de lockdep al tomar una instant\u00e1nea del volumen de datos de mongodb. $ cat test.sh prog=bcachefs $prog subvolumen crear /mnt/data $prog subvolumen crear /mnt/data/snapshots mientras es verdadero;do $prog subvolumen snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(fecha +% s) dormir 1 hecho $ cat /etc/mongodb.conf systemLog: destino: archivo logAppend: verdadera ruta: /mnt/data/mongod.log almacenamiento: dbPath: /mnt/data/ lockdep informes: [3437.452330] ==== ==================================================== [ 3437.452750] ADVERTENCIA: posible dependencia de bloqueo circular detectada [ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Contaminado: GE [ 3437.453562] ---------------------- -------------------------------- [ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 est\u00e1 intentando adquirir el bloqueo: [ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers #10){.+.+}-{0:0}, en: filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.454875] pero la tarea ya mantiene el bloqueo: [ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (\u0026amp;type-\u0026gt;s_umount_key#48){.+.+ }-{3:3}, en: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.456009] cuyo bloqueo ya depende del nuevo bloqueo. [ 3437.456553] la cadena de dependencia existente (en orden inverso) es: [ 3437.457054] -\u0026gt; #3 (\u0026amp;type-\u0026gt;s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}: [ 3437.457507] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.457772] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.458206] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.458498] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.458 779] Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [3437.459155] -\u0026gt; #2 (\u0026amp;c-\u0026gt;snapshot_create_lock){+ +++}-{3:3}: [ 3437.459615] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.459878] bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460276] bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.4 60686] notificar_cambio+0x1f1/0x4a0 [ 3437.461283] do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0 [ 3437.461555] path_openat+0xa57/0xce0 [ 3437.461836] do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160 [ 3437.462116] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0 [ 34 37.462402] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 3437.462701] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.462982] Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.463359] -\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;sb-\u0026gt;s_type-\u0026gt;i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3437.463843] down_write+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3437.464223] bch2_write_it e+0x5b /0xcc0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.464493] vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0 [ 3437.464653] ksys_write+0x69/0xf0 [ 3437.464839] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.465009] entrada_SYSCALL _64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.465231] -\u0026gt; #0 (sb_writers#10){ .+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3437.465471] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.465656] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.465822] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.465996] nombre de archivo _create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.466175] ruta_usuario_create+0x2d /0x50 [ 3437.466352] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.466617] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.466791] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437 .466957] Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.467180] otra informaci\u00f3n que podr\u00eda ayudarnos a depurar esto: [ 3437.469670] 2 bloqueos mantenidos por bcachefs/35533: otra informaci\u00f3n que podr\u00eda ayudarnos a depurar esto: [3437.467507] Existe cadena de: sb_writers#10 --\u0026gt; \u0026amp;c-\u0026gt;snapshot_create_lock --\u0026gt; \u0026amp;type-\u0026gt;s_umount_key#48 [3437.467979] Posiblemente inseguro escenario de bloqueo: [3437.468223] CPU0 CPU1 [3437.468405] ---- ---- [3437.468585] rlock(\u0026amp;type-\u0026gt;s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.468758] bloqueo(\u0026amp;c-\u0026gt;snapshot_create_lock); [ 3437.469030] bloqueo(\u0026amp;type-\u0026gt;s_umount_key#48); [3437.469291] rlock(sb_writers#10); [ 3437.469434] *** INTERBLOQUEO *** [ 3437.469 ---truncado---"
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-26658",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-02T12:50:42.233",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-04-02T07:15:42.903",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2acc59dd88d27ad69b66ded80df16c042b04eeec"
          },
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b41d3fd04c6757b9c2a60a0c5b2609cae9999df"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.