gsd-2024-26775
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-02-20 06:02
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: aoe: avoid potential deadlock at set_capacity Move set_capacity() outside of the section procected by (&d->lock). To avoid possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- [1] lock(&bdev->bd_size_lock); local_irq_disable(); [2] lock(&d->lock); [3] lock(&bdev->bd_size_lock); <Interrupt> [4] lock(&d->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** Where [1](&bdev->bd_size_lock) hold by zram_add()->set_capacity(). [2]lock(&d->lock) hold by aoeblk_gdalloc(). And aoeblk_gdalloc() is trying to acquire [3](&bdev->bd_size_lock) at set_capacity() call. In this situation an attempt to acquire [4]lock(&d->lock) from aoecmd_cfg_rsp() will lead to deadlock. So the simplest solution is breaking lock dependency [2](&d->lock) -> [3](&bdev->bd_size_lock) by moving set_capacity() outside.
Aliases



{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2024-26775"
      ],
      "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naoe: avoid potential deadlock at set_capacity\n\nMove set_capacity() outside of the section procected by (\u0026d-\u003elock).\nTo avoid possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:\n\n        CPU0                    CPU1\n        ----                    ----\n[1] lock(\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock);\n                                local_irq_disable();\n                            [2] lock(\u0026d-\u003elock);\n                            [3] lock(\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock);\n   \u003cInterrupt\u003e\n[4]  lock(\u0026d-\u003elock);\n\n  *** DEADLOCK ***\n\nWhere [1](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) hold by zram_add()-\u003eset_capacity().\n[2]lock(\u0026d-\u003elock) hold by aoeblk_gdalloc(). And aoeblk_gdalloc()\nis trying to acquire [3](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) at set_capacity() call.\nIn this situation an attempt to acquire [4]lock(\u0026d-\u003elock) from\naoecmd_cfg_rsp() will lead to deadlock.\n\nSo the simplest solution is breaking lock dependency\n[2](\u0026d-\u003elock) -\u003e [3](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) by moving set_capacity()\noutside.",
      "id": "GSD-2024-26775",
      "modified": "2024-02-20T06:02:29.272286Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2024-26775",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Linux",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_affected": "\u003c",
                          "version_name": "1da177e4c3f4",
                          "version_value": "2d623c94fbba"
                        },
                        {
                          "version_value": "not down converted",
                          "x_cve_json_5_version_data": {
                            "defaultStatus": "affected",
                            "versions": [
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "6.1.80",
                                "versionType": "custom"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "6.6.19",
                                "versionType": "custom"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "6.7.*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "6.7.7",
                                "versionType": "custom"
                              },
                              {
                                "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
                                "status": "unaffected",
                                "version": "6.8",
                                "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
                              }
                            ]
                          }
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Linux"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naoe: avoid potential deadlock at set_capacity\n\nMove set_capacity() outside of the section procected by (\u0026d-\u003elock).\nTo avoid possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:\n\n        CPU0                    CPU1\n        ----                    ----\n[1] lock(\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock);\n                                local_irq_disable();\n                            [2] lock(\u0026d-\u003elock);\n                            [3] lock(\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock);\n   \u003cInterrupt\u003e\n[4]  lock(\u0026d-\u003elock);\n\n  *** DEADLOCK ***\n\nWhere [1](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) hold by zram_add()-\u003eset_capacity().\n[2]lock(\u0026d-\u003elock) hold by aoeblk_gdalloc(). And aoeblk_gdalloc()\nis trying to acquire [3](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) at set_capacity() call.\nIn this situation an attempt to acquire [4]lock(\u0026d-\u003elock) from\naoecmd_cfg_rsp() will lead to deadlock.\n\nSo the simplest solution is breaking lock dependency\n[2](\u0026d-\u003elock) -\u003e [3](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) by moving set_capacity()\noutside."
          }
        ]
      },
      "generator": {
        "engine": "bippy-d3b290d2becc"
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d623c94fbba3554f4446ba6f3c764994e8b0d26",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d623c94fbba3554f4446ba6f3c764994e8b0d26"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/673629018ba04906899dcb631beec34d871f709c",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/673629018ba04906899dcb631beec34d871f709c"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19a77b27163820f793b4d022979ffdca8f659b77",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19a77b27163820f793b4d022979ffdca8f659b77"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e169bd4fb2b36c4b2bee63c35c740c85daeb2e86",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e169bd4fb2b36c4b2bee63c35c740c85daeb2e86"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\naoe: avoid potential deadlock at set_capacity\n\nMove set_capacity() outside of the section procected by (\u0026d-\u003elock).\nTo avoid possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:\n\n        CPU0                    CPU1\n        ----                    ----\n[1] lock(\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock);\n                                local_irq_disable();\n                            [2] lock(\u0026d-\u003elock);\n                            [3] lock(\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock);\n   \u003cInterrupt\u003e\n[4]  lock(\u0026d-\u003elock);\n\n  *** DEADLOCK ***\n\nWhere [1](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) hold by zram_add()-\u003eset_capacity().\n[2]lock(\u0026d-\u003elock) hold by aoeblk_gdalloc(). And aoeblk_gdalloc()\nis trying to acquire [3](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) at set_capacity() call.\nIn this situation an attempt to acquire [4]lock(\u0026d-\u003elock) from\naoecmd_cfg_rsp() will lead to deadlock.\n\nSo the simplest solution is breaking lock dependency\n[2](\u0026d-\u003elock) -\u003e [3](\u0026bdev-\u003ebd_size_lock) by moving set_capacity()\noutside."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-26775",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-03T17:24:18.150",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-04-03T17:15:53.187",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19a77b27163820f793b4d022979ffdca8f659b77"
          },
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d623c94fbba3554f4446ba6f3c764994e8b0d26"
          },
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/673629018ba04906899dcb631beec34d871f709c"
          },
          {
            "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
            "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e169bd4fb2b36c4b2bee63c35c740c85daeb2e86"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.