gsd-2024-26868
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-02-20 06:02
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfs: fix panic when nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() fails
We've been seeing the following panic in production
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000065
PGD 2f485f067 P4D 2f485f067 PUD 2cc5d8067 PMD 0
RIP: 0010:ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die+0x78/0xc0
? page_fault_oops+0x286/0x380
? __rpc_execute+0x2c3/0x470 [sunrpc]
? rpc_new_task+0x42/0x1c0 [sunrpc]
? exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
? ff_layout_free_layoutreturn+0x110/0x110 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x6f/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return+0x1b0/0x360 [nfsv4]
pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return+0x9e/0x110 [nfsv4]
? ff_layout_send_layouterror+0x50/0x160 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds+0x11f/0x290 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
ff_layout_pg_init_write+0xf0/0x1f0 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]
__nfs_pageio_add_request+0x154/0x6c0 [nfs]
nfs_pageio_add_request+0x26b/0x380 [nfs]
nfs_do_writepage+0x111/0x1e0 [nfs]
nfs_writepages_callback+0xf/0x30 [nfs]
write_cache_pages+0x17f/0x380
? nfs_pageio_init_write+0x50/0x50 [nfs]
? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]
? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]
nfs_writepages+0x125/0x210 [nfs]
do_writepages+0x67/0x220
? generic_perform_write+0x14b/0x210
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x5b/0x80
file_write_and_wait_range+0x6d/0xc0
nfs_file_fsync+0x81/0x170 [nfs]
? nfs_file_mmap+0x60/0x60 [nfs]
__x64_sys_fsync+0x53/0x90
do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
Inspecting the core with drgn I was able to pull this
>>> prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]
#0 at 0xffffffffa079657a (ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x84) in ff_layout_cancel_io at fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:2021:27
>>> prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]['idx']
(u32)1
>>> prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]['flseg'].mirror_array[1].mirror_ds
(struct nfs4_ff_layout_ds *)0xffffffffffffffed
This is clear from the stack trace, we call nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds()
which could error out initializing the mirror_ds, and then we go to
clean it all up and our check is only for if (!mirror->mirror_ds). This
is inconsistent with the rest of the users of mirror_ds, which have
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mirror_ds))
to keep from tripping over this exact scenario. Fix this up in
ff_layout_cancel_io() to make sure we don't panic when we get an error.
I also spot checked all the other instances of checking mirror_ds and we
appear to be doing the correct checks everywhere, only unconditionally
dereferencing mirror_ds when we know it would be valid.
Aliases
{
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-26868"
],
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfs: fix panic when nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() fails\n\nWe\u0027ve been seeing the following panic in production\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000065\nPGD 2f485f067 P4D 2f485f067 PUD 2cc5d8067 PMD 0\nRIP: 0010:ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die+0x78/0xc0\n ? page_fault_oops+0x286/0x380\n ? __rpc_execute+0x2c3/0x470 [sunrpc]\n ? rpc_new_task+0x42/0x1c0 [sunrpc]\n ? exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? ff_layout_free_layoutreturn+0x110/0x110 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x6f/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return+0x1b0/0x360 [nfsv4]\n pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return+0x9e/0x110 [nfsv4]\n ? ff_layout_send_layouterror+0x50/0x160 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds+0x11f/0x290 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ff_layout_pg_init_write+0xf0/0x1f0 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n __nfs_pageio_add_request+0x154/0x6c0 [nfs]\n nfs_pageio_add_request+0x26b/0x380 [nfs]\n nfs_do_writepage+0x111/0x1e0 [nfs]\n nfs_writepages_callback+0xf/0x30 [nfs]\n write_cache_pages+0x17f/0x380\n ? nfs_pageio_init_write+0x50/0x50 [nfs]\n ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]\n ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]\n nfs_writepages+0x125/0x210 [nfs]\n do_writepages+0x67/0x220\n ? generic_perform_write+0x14b/0x210\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x5b/0x80\n file_write_and_wait_range+0x6d/0xc0\n nfs_file_fsync+0x81/0x170 [nfs]\n ? nfs_file_mmap+0x60/0x60 [nfs]\n __x64_sys_fsync+0x53/0x90\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n\nInspecting the core with drgn I was able to pull this\n\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]\n #0 at 0xffffffffa079657a (ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x84) in ff_layout_cancel_io at fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:2021:27\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027idx\u0027]\n (u32)1\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027flseg\u0027].mirror_array[1].mirror_ds\n (struct nfs4_ff_layout_ds *)0xffffffffffffffed\n\nThis is clear from the stack trace, we call nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds()\nwhich could error out initializing the mirror_ds, and then we go to\nclean it all up and our check is only for if (!mirror-\u003emirror_ds). This\nis inconsistent with the rest of the users of mirror_ds, which have\n\n if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mirror_ds))\n\nto keep from tripping over this exact scenario. Fix this up in\nff_layout_cancel_io() to make sure we don\u0027t panic when we get an error.\nI also spot checked all the other instances of checking mirror_ds and we\nappear to be doing the correct checks everywhere, only unconditionally\ndereferencing mirror_ds when we know it would be valid.",
"id": "GSD-2024-26868",
"modified": "2024-02-20T06:02:29.220284Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@kernel.org",
"ID": "CVE-2024-26868",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Linux",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "b739a5bd9d9f",
"version_value": "31db25e3141b"
},
{
"version_value": "not down converted",
"x_cve_json_5_version_data": {
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.1"
},
{
"lessThan": "6.1",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.83",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.23",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.7.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7.11",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.8.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.8.2",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.9-rc1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Linux"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfs: fix panic when nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() fails\n\nWe\u0027ve been seeing the following panic in production\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000065\nPGD 2f485f067 P4D 2f485f067 PUD 2cc5d8067 PMD 0\nRIP: 0010:ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die+0x78/0xc0\n ? page_fault_oops+0x286/0x380\n ? __rpc_execute+0x2c3/0x470 [sunrpc]\n ? rpc_new_task+0x42/0x1c0 [sunrpc]\n ? exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? ff_layout_free_layoutreturn+0x110/0x110 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x6f/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return+0x1b0/0x360 [nfsv4]\n pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return+0x9e/0x110 [nfsv4]\n ? ff_layout_send_layouterror+0x50/0x160 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds+0x11f/0x290 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ff_layout_pg_init_write+0xf0/0x1f0 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n __nfs_pageio_add_request+0x154/0x6c0 [nfs]\n nfs_pageio_add_request+0x26b/0x380 [nfs]\n nfs_do_writepage+0x111/0x1e0 [nfs]\n nfs_writepages_callback+0xf/0x30 [nfs]\n write_cache_pages+0x17f/0x380\n ? nfs_pageio_init_write+0x50/0x50 [nfs]\n ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]\n ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]\n nfs_writepages+0x125/0x210 [nfs]\n do_writepages+0x67/0x220\n ? generic_perform_write+0x14b/0x210\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x5b/0x80\n file_write_and_wait_range+0x6d/0xc0\n nfs_file_fsync+0x81/0x170 [nfs]\n ? nfs_file_mmap+0x60/0x60 [nfs]\n __x64_sys_fsync+0x53/0x90\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n\nInspecting the core with drgn I was able to pull this\n\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]\n #0 at 0xffffffffa079657a (ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x84) in ff_layout_cancel_io at fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:2021:27\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027idx\u0027]\n (u32)1\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027flseg\u0027].mirror_array[1].mirror_ds\n (struct nfs4_ff_layout_ds *)0xffffffffffffffed\n\nThis is clear from the stack trace, we call nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds()\nwhich could error out initializing the mirror_ds, and then we go to\nclean it all up and our check is only for if (!mirror-\u003emirror_ds). This\nis inconsistent with the rest of the users of mirror_ds, which have\n\n if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mirror_ds))\n\nto keep from tripping over this exact scenario. Fix this up in\nff_layout_cancel_io() to make sure we don\u0027t panic when we get an error.\nI also spot checked all the other instances of checking mirror_ds and we\nappear to be doing the correct checks everywhere, only unconditionally\ndereferencing mirror_ds when we know it would be valid."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "bippy-d175d3acf727"
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31db25e3141b20e2a76a9f219eeca52e3cab126c",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31db25e3141b20e2a76a9f219eeca52e3cab126c"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca651b4ec4a049f5a46a0e5ff921b86b91c47c5",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca651b4ec4a049f5a46a0e5ff921b86b91c47c5"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ada9016b1217498fad876a3d5b07645cc955608",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ada9016b1217498fad876a3d5b07645cc955608"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dac068f164ad05b35e7c0be13f138c3f6adca58f",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dac068f164ad05b35e7c0be13f138c3f6adca58f"
},
{
"name": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/719fcafe07c12646691bd62d7f8d94d657fa0766",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/719fcafe07c12646691bd62d7f8d94d657fa0766"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"cve": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfs: fix panic when nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds() fails\n\nWe\u0027ve been seeing the following panic in production\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000065\nPGD 2f485f067 P4D 2f485f067 PUD 2cc5d8067 PMD 0\nRIP: 0010:ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __die+0x78/0xc0\n ? page_fault_oops+0x286/0x380\n ? __rpc_execute+0x2c3/0x470 [sunrpc]\n ? rpc_new_task+0x42/0x1c0 [sunrpc]\n ? exc_page_fault+0x5d/0x110\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? ff_layout_free_layoutreturn+0x110/0x110 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ? ff_layout_cancel_io+0x6f/0x90 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return+0x1b0/0x360 [nfsv4]\n pnfs_error_mark_layout_for_return+0x9e/0x110 [nfsv4]\n ? ff_layout_send_layouterror+0x50/0x160 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds+0x11f/0x290 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n ff_layout_pg_init_write+0xf0/0x1f0 [nfs_layout_flexfiles]\n __nfs_pageio_add_request+0x154/0x6c0 [nfs]\n nfs_pageio_add_request+0x26b/0x380 [nfs]\n nfs_do_writepage+0x111/0x1e0 [nfs]\n nfs_writepages_callback+0xf/0x30 [nfs]\n write_cache_pages+0x17f/0x380\n ? nfs_pageio_init_write+0x50/0x50 [nfs]\n ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]\n ? nfs_writepages+0x6d/0x210 [nfs]\n nfs_writepages+0x125/0x210 [nfs]\n do_writepages+0x67/0x220\n ? generic_perform_write+0x14b/0x210\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x5b/0x80\n file_write_and_wait_range+0x6d/0xc0\n nfs_file_fsync+0x81/0x170 [nfs]\n ? nfs_file_mmap+0x60/0x60 [nfs]\n __x64_sys_fsync+0x53/0x90\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n\nInspecting the core with drgn I was able to pull this\n\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]\n #0 at 0xffffffffa079657a (ff_layout_cancel_io+0x3a/0x84) in ff_layout_cancel_io at fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c:2021:27\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027idx\u0027]\n (u32)1\n \u003e\u003e\u003e prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0][\u0027flseg\u0027].mirror_array[1].mirror_ds\n (struct nfs4_ff_layout_ds *)0xffffffffffffffed\n\nThis is clear from the stack trace, we call nfs4_ff_layout_prepare_ds()\nwhich could error out initializing the mirror_ds, and then we go to\nclean it all up and our check is only for if (!mirror-\u003emirror_ds). This\nis inconsistent with the rest of the users of mirror_ds, which have\n\n if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mirror_ds))\n\nto keep from tripping over this exact scenario. Fix this up in\nff_layout_cancel_io() to make sure we don\u0027t panic when we get an error.\nI also spot checked all the other instances of checking mirror_ds and we\nappear to be doing the correct checks everywhere, only unconditionally\ndereferencing mirror_ds when we know it would be valid."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-26868",
"lastModified": "2024-04-17T12:48:07.510",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2024-04-17T11:15:09.360",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/31db25e3141b20e2a76a9f219eeca52e3cab126c"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ada9016b1217498fad876a3d5b07645cc955608"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/719fcafe07c12646691bd62d7f8d94d657fa0766"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ca651b4ec4a049f5a46a0e5ff921b86b91c47c5"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dac068f164ad05b35e7c0be13f138c3f6adca58f"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.