pysec-2023-191
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2023-09-27 15:19
Modified
2023-10-04 20:26
Severity ?
Details
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. The _abi_decode()
function does not validate input when it is nested in an expression. Uses of _abi_decode()
can be constructed which allow for bounds checking to be bypassed resulting in incorrect results. This issue has not yet been fixed, but a fix is expected in release 0.3.10
. Users are advised to reference pull request #3626.
Aliases
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "vyper", "purl": "pkg:pypi/vyper" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0.3.4" }, { "fixed": "0.3.10" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "0.3.10rc1", "0.3.10rc2", "0.3.10rc3", "0.3.10rc4", "0.3.10rc5", "0.3.4", "0.3.5", "0.3.6", "0.3.7", "0.3.8", "0.3.9" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-42460", "GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97" ], "details": "Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. The `_abi_decode()` function does not validate input when it is nested in an expression. Uses of `_abi_decode()` can be constructed which allow for bounds checking to be bypassed resulting in incorrect results. This issue has not yet been fixed, but a fix is expected in release `0.3.10`. Users are advised to reference pull request #3626.", "id": "PYSEC-2023-191", "modified": "2023-10-04T20:26:42.494872+00:00", "published": "2023-09-27T15:19:00+00:00", "references": [ { "type": "EVIDENCE", "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97" }, { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-cx2q-hfxr-rj97" }, { "type": "FIX", "url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3626" } ], "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.