CWE-352
AllowedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Abstraction: Compound · Status: Stable
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
14162 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-FM9G-GQ64-XW4H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:53 – Updated: 2023-02-24 21:30The wp-database-backup plugin before 4.3.3 for WordPress has CSRF.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-10874"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-08-12T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The wp-database-backup plugin before 4.3.3 for WordPress has CSRF.",
"id": "GHSA-fm9g-gq64-xw4h",
"modified": "2023-02-24T21:30:19Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:53:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10874"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-database-backup/#developers"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/9739"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FM9Q-9F53-5P3P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-10-16 03:31 – Updated: 2024-10-16 03:31The WP ULike – The Ultimate Engagement Toolkit for Websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.7.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_ulike_delete_history_api() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete engagements via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-9649"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-10-16T02:15:07Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The WP ULike \u2013 The Ultimate Engagement Toolkit for Websites plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.7.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_ulike_delete_history_api() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete engagements via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.",
"id": "GHSA-fm9q-9f53-5p3p",
"modified": "2024-10-16T03:31:33Z",
"published": "2024-10-16T03:31:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-9649"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WordpressPluginDirectory/wp-ulike/blob/fd5eb54948cc1af9c348530a3cbd89c5a4bc68d0/wp-ulike/admin/admin-ajax.php#L78-L100"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3168233%40wp-ulike\u0026new=3168233%40wp-ulike\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=#file0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/3fcb35f8-ed88-4440-8cdf-95c1f0028253?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FMCG-P686-J68G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:47 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:47There is CSRF in the WHIZZ plugin before 1.1.1 for WordPress, allowing attackers to delete any WordPress users and change the plugin's status via a GET request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-8099"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-04-24T18:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "There is CSRF in the WHIZZ plugin before 1.1.1 for WordPress, allowing attackers to delete any WordPress users and change the plugin\u0027s status via a GET request.",
"id": "GHSA-fmcg-p686-j68g",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:47:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:47:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-8099"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/whizz/trunk/change_log.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2017/Apr/41"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FMGM-X3QP-R9PJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-18 18:30 – Updated: 2024-01-23 15:30FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/email/email_templets_update.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-22819"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-18T17:15:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "FlyCms v1.0 contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /system/email/email_templets_update.",
"id": "GHSA-fmgm-x3qp-r9pj",
"modified": "2024-01-23T15:30:57Z",
"published": "2024-01-18T18:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22819"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mafangqian/cms/blob/main/2.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FMP6-MWG6-HG78
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-13 21:30Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce woo-conditional-product-fees-for-checkout allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce: from n/a through <= 4.3.3.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39671"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T09:16:38Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Dotstore Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce woo-conditional-product-fees-for-checkout allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Extra Fees Plugin for WooCommerce: from n/a through \u003c= 4.3.3.",
"id": "GHSA-fmp6-mwg6-hg78",
"modified": "2026-04-13T21:30:36Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T09:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39671"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/woo-conditional-product-fees-for-checkout/vulnerability/wordpress-extra-fees-plugin-for-woocommerce-plugin-4-3-3-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FMPJ-8C4W-Q47G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:10 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:10Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Call Detail Records Analysis and Reporting (CAR) page in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 10.0(1) and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that make CAR modifications, aka Bug ID CSCum46468.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0736"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-02-20T05:18:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Call Detail Records Analysis and Reporting (CAR) page in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) 10.0(1) and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that make CAR modifications, aka Bug ID CSCum46468.",
"id": "GHSA-fmpj-8c4w-q47g",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:10:09Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:10:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2014-0736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=32911"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1029792"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-FMR9-F844-7M23
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-09 18:30 – Updated: 2026-01-20 15:32Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PressTigers Simple Folio simple-folio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Folio: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-64256"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T16:18:14Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PressTigers Simple Folio simple-folio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Folio: from n/a through \u003c= 1.1.0.",
"id": "GHSA-fmr9-f844-7m23",
"modified": "2026-01-20T15:32:04Z",
"published": "2025-12-09T18:30:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64256"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/simple-folio/vulnerability/wordpress-simple-folio-plugin-1-1-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vdp.patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/simple-folio/vulnerability/wordpress-simple-folio-plugin-1-1-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FMRH-J366-X3G8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:55 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:53Silver Peak EdgeConnect SD-WAN before 8.1.7.x allows CSRF via JSON data to a .swf file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-16099"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-09-08T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Silver Peak EdgeConnect SD-WAN before 8.1.7.x allows CSRF via JSON data to a .swf file.",
"id": "GHSA-fmrh-j366-x3g8",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:53:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:55:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16099"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/sdnewhop/sdwannewhope/blob/master/reports/Silverpeak%20EdgeConnect%20Multiple%20Vulnerabilities%20-%20032018.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FMVV-RRVC-RH7F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-05 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:33Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smash Balloon Custom Twitter Feeds – A Tweets Widget or X Feed Widget.This issue affects Custom Twitter Feeds – A Tweets Widget or X Feed Widget: from n/a through 2.1.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52136"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-05T09:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smash Balloon Custom Twitter Feeds \u2013 A Tweets Widget or X Feed Widget.This issue affects Custom Twitter Feeds \u2013 A Tweets Widget or X Feed Widget: from n/a through 2.1.2.",
"id": "GHSA-fmvv-rrvc-rh7f",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:33:43Z",
"published": "2024-01-05T09:30:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52136"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/custom-twitter-feeds/wordpress-custom-twitter-feeds-tweets-widget-plugin-2-1-2-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-FMWW-X8FC-GQFJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-20 15:31 – Updated: 2026-03-23 15:30An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Webmail due to improper validation of CSRF tokens. The application accepts CSRF tokens supplied within the request body instead of requiring them through the expected request header. An attacker can exploit this issue by tricking an authenticated user into submitting a crafted request. This may allow unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33372"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-20T14:16:16Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Webmail due to improper validation of CSRF tokens. The application accepts CSRF tokens supplied within the request body instead of requiring them through the expected request header. An attacker can exploit this issue by tricking an authenticated user into submitting a crafted request. This may allow unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim.",
"id": "GHSA-fmww-x8fc-gqfj",
"modified": "2026-03-23T15:30:33Z",
"published": "2026-03-20T15:31:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33372"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Security_Center"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Releases/10.1.16#Security_Fixes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Responsible_Disclosure_Policy"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_Security_Advisories"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330]
- Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
Mitigation
Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
Mitigation
Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
Mitigation
Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
Mitigation
- Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:
- When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same.
- Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult.
- This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
Mitigation
Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Mitigation
Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.
CAPEC-111: JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)
An attacker targets a system that uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) as a transport mechanism between the client and the server (common in Web 2.0 systems using AJAX) to steal possibly confidential information transmitted from the server back to the client inside the JSON object by taking advantage of the loophole in the browser's Same Origin Policy that does not prohibit JavaScript from one website to be included and executed in the context of another website.
CAPEC-462: Cross-Domain Search Timing
An attacker initiates cross domain HTTP / GET requests and times the server responses. The timing of these responses may leak important information on what is happening on the server. Browser's same origin policy prevents the attacker from directly reading the server responses (in the absence of any other weaknesses), but does not prevent the attacker from timing the responses to requests that the attacker issued cross domain.
CAPEC-467: Cross Site Identification
An attacker harvests identifying information about a victim via an active session that the victim's browser has with a social networking site. A victim may have the social networking site open in one tab or perhaps is simply using the "remember me" feature to keep their session with the social networking site active. An attacker induces a payload to execute in the victim's browser that transparently to the victim initiates a request to the social networking site (e.g., via available social network site APIs) to retrieve identifying information about a victim. While some of this information may be public, the attacker is able to harvest this information in context and may use it for further attacks on the user (e.g., spear phishing).
CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery
An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.