Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-354
AllowedImproper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not validate or incorrectly validates the integrity check values or "checksums" of a message. This may prevent it from detecting if the data has been modified or corrupted in transmission.
231 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2025-33193 (GCVE-0-2025-33193)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-25 17:59 – Updated: 2025-11-25 20:29
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in SROOT firmware, where an attacker could cause improper validation of integrity. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure.
Severity
5.7 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-33193",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T20:29:10.239982Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T20:29:19.276Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"NVIDIA DGX OS"
],
"product": "DGX Spark",
"vendor": "NVIDIA",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions prior to OTA0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": true,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in SROOT firmware, where an attacker could cause improper validation of integrity. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure."
}
],
"value": "NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in SROOT firmware, where an attacker could cause improper validation of integrity. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Code Execution, Denial of Service, Information Disclosure"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T17:59:10.971Z",
"orgId": "9576f279-3576-44b5-a4af-b9a8644b2de6",
"shortName": "nvidia"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-33193"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33193"
},
{
"url": "https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5720"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "NVIDIA PSIRT"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9576f279-3576-44b5-a4af-b9a8644b2de6",
"assignerShortName": "nvidia",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-33193",
"datePublished": "2025-11-25T17:59:10.971Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-15T18:51:03.729Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T20:29:19.276Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-25183 (GCVE-0-2025-25183)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-07 19:59 – Updated: 2025-02-12 20:51
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
vLLM using built-in hash() from Python 3.12 leads to predictable hash collisions in vLLM prefix cache
Summary
vLLM is a high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs. Maliciously constructed statements can lead to hash collisions, resulting in cache reuse, which can interfere with subsequent responses and cause unintended behavior. Prefix caching makes use of Python's built-in hash() function. As of Python 3.12, the behavior of hash(None) has changed to be a predictable constant value. This makes it more feasible that someone could try exploit hash collisions. The impact of a collision would be using cache that was generated using different content. Given knowledge of prompts in use and predictable hashing behavior, someone could intentionally populate the cache using a prompt known to collide with another prompt in use. This issue has been addressed in version 0.7.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12621 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/432117cd… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| vllm-project | vllm |
Affected:
< 0.7.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-25183",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-07T20:33:57.205558Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:51:46.402Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "vllm",
"vendor": "vllm-project",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.7.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "vLLM is a high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs. Maliciously constructed statements can lead to hash collisions, resulting in cache reuse, which can interfere with subsequent responses and cause unintended behavior. Prefix caching makes use of Python\u0027s built-in hash() function. As of Python 3.12, the behavior of hash(None) has changed to be a predictable constant value. This makes it more feasible that someone could try exploit hash collisions. The impact of a collision would be using cache that was generated using different content. Given knowledge of prompts in use and predictable hashing behavior, someone could intentionally populate the cache using a prompt known to collide with another prompt in use. This issue has been addressed in version 0.7.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.6,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-07T19:59:01.370Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-rm76-4mrf-v9r8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-rm76-4mrf-v9r8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12621",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12621"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/432117cd1f59c76d97da2eaff55a7d758301dbc7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/432117cd1f59c76d97da2eaff55a7d758301dbc7"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rm76-4mrf-v9r8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "vLLM using built-in hash() from Python 3.12 leads to predictable hash collisions in vLLM prefix cache"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-25183",
"datePublished": "2025-02-07T19:59:01.370Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-03T19:30:53.399Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:51:46.402Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-11694 (GCVE-0-2025-11694)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-16 13:39 – Updated: 2026-06-16 17:48
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 5370 Controllers – Multiple Vulnerabilities
Summary
A security issue exists within 1769 CompactLogix controllers due to the missing validation of sequence numbers and source IP addresses in the CIP protocol. This allows attacker to abuse the exposed Connection ID’s visible on the web interface to perform denial-of-service attacks, resulting in a minor fault.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper validation of integrity check value
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Automation | CompactLogix 5370 |
Affected:
V36
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11694",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-16T15:21:18.608064Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T15:21:42.199Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "CompactLogix 5370",
"vendor": "Rockwell Automation",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "V36",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "This security issue was found by external researcher Tyler Lentz of Idaho National Laboratory."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A security issue exists within\u0026nbsp;1769 CompactLogix controllers\u0026nbsp;due to the\u0026nbsp;missing validation of sequence numbers and source IP addresses in the CIP protocol. This allows attacker to abuse the exposed Connection ID\u2019s visible on the web interface to perform denial-of-service attacks, resulting in a\u0026nbsp;minor fault."
}
],
"value": "A security issue exists within\u00a01769 CompactLogix controllers\u00a0due to the\u00a0missing validation of sequence numbers and source IP addresses in the CIP protocol. This allows attacker to abuse the exposed Connection ID\u2019s visible on the web interface to perform denial-of-service attacks, resulting in a\u00a0minor fault."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper validation of integrity check value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T17:48:53.691Z",
"orgId": "b73dd486-f505-4403-b634-40b078b177f0",
"shortName": "Rockwell"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1776.html"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003ca href=\"https://compatibility.rockwellautomation.com/Pages/MultiProductFindDownloads.aspx?crumb=112\u0026amp;mode=3\u0026amp;refSoft=1\u0026amp;versions=55023,55024,55025,55026,55027,55061\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"\u003eV38.011\u003c/a\u003e\u0026nbsp;"
}
],
"value": "V38.011 https://compatibility.rockwellautomation.com/Pages/MultiProductFindDownloads.aspx"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "SD1776",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 5370 Controllers \u2013 Multiple Vulnerabilities",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b73dd486-f505-4403-b634-40b078b177f0",
"assignerShortName": "Rockwell",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11694",
"datePublished": "2026-06-16T13:39:46.158Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-13T15:55:35.637Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-16T17:48:53.691Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-11543 (GCVE-0-2025-11543)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-22 05:09 – Updated: 2025-12-22 14:33 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Sharp Display Solutions projectors allows a attacker may create and run unauthorized firmware.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11543",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-22T14:33:50.755374Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-22T14:33:56.512Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "NP-P502HL-2, NP-P502WL-2, NP-P502HLG-2, NP-P502WLG, NP-P502H, NP-P502W, NP-P452H, NP-P452W, NP-P502HG, NP-P502WG, NP-P452HG, NP-P452WG, NP-P502H+, NP-P502W+, NP-CR5450H, NP-CR5450W, NP-P502HL, NP-P502WL, NP-P502HLG, NP-P502WLG, NP-P502HL+, NP-P502WL+, NP-CR5450HL, NP-CR5450WL, NP-UM352W, NP-UM352WG, NP-UM352W+",
"vendor": "Sharp Display Solutions, Ltd.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Sebastian Pahl of University Luxembourg"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Sharp Display Solutions projectors allows a attacker may create and run unauthorized firmware."
}
],
"value": "Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Sharp Display Solutions projectors allows a attacker may create and run unauthorized firmware."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.5,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-22T05:09:48.892Z",
"orgId": "f2760a35-e0d8-4637-ac4c-cc1a2de3e282",
"shortName": "NEC"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://sharp-displays.jp.sharp/global/support/info/PJ-CVE-2025-11540.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f2760a35-e0d8-4637-ac4c-cc1a2de3e282",
"assignerShortName": "NEC",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11543",
"datePublished": "2025-12-22T05:09:48.892Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-09T06:46:42.281Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-22T14:33:56.512Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-7096 (GCVE-0-2025-7096)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-06 22:02 – Updated: 2025-07-07 15:46
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Comodo Internet Security Premium Manifest File cis_update_x64.xml integrity check
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Comodo Internet Security Premium 12.3.4.8162. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file cis_update_x64.xml of the component Manifest File Handler. The manipulation leads to improper validation of integrity check value. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.315010 | vdb-entry |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.315010 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.603713 | third-party-advisory |
| https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qnWarYsTSc5_sV6o… | exploit |
| https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qnWarYsTSc5_sV6o… | exploit |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comodo | Internet Security Premium |
Affected:
12.3.4.8162
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-7096",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-07-07T15:46:20.296139Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-07T15:46:23.946Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qnWarYsTSc5_sV6o8ULv0LBvGfKKXPxn/view"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Manifest File Handler"
],
"product": "Internet Security Premium",
"vendor": "Comodo",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.3.4.8162"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "FPT IS Security (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Comodo Internet Security Premium 12.3.4.8162. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file cis_update_x64.xml of the component Manifest File Handler. The manipulation leads to improper validation of integrity check value. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "In Comodo Internet Security Premium 12.3.4.8162 wurde eine Schwachstelle entdeckt. Sie wurde als kritisch eingestuft. Es geht um eine nicht n\u00e4her bekannte Funktion der Datei cis_update_x64.xml der Komponente Manifest File Handler. Durch die Manipulation mit unbekannten Daten kann eine improper validation of integrity check value-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann \u00fcber das Netzwerk erfolgen. Die Komplexit\u00e4t eines Angriffs ist eher hoch. Das Ausnutzen gilt als schwierig. Der Exploit steht zur \u00f6ffentlichen Verf\u00fcgung."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 9.2,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 7.6,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-345",
"description": "Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-06T22:02:05.665Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-315010 | Comodo Internet Security Premium Manifest File cis_update_x64.xml integrity check",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.315010"
},
{
"name": "VDB-315010 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.315010"
},
{
"name": "Submit #603713 | Comodo Security Solutions Comodo Internet Security Premium 12.3.4.8162 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.603713"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qnWarYsTSc5_sV6o8ULv0LBvGfKKXPxn/view?usp=sharing"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-07-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-07-05T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-07-05T17:41:46.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "Comodo Internet Security Premium Manifest File cis_update_x64.xml integrity check"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-7096",
"datePublished": "2025-07-06T22:02:05.665Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-05T15:36:33.242Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-07-07T15:46:23.946Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-4616 (GCVE-0-2025-4616)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-14 17:33 – Updated: 2025-11-17 20:39
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Prisma Browser: Insufficient Validation of Untrusted Input Vulnerability in Prisma Browser
Summary
An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser’s security controls.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2025-4616 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | Prisma Browser |
Affected:
142.15.6.0 , ≤ 142.15.6.60
(custom)
|
Date Public
2025-11-12 17:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-4616",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-17T20:39:14.854172Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T20:39:22.564Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Prisma Browser",
"vendor": "Palo Alto Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "142.15.6.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "142.15.6.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "No special configuration is required to be affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "No special configuration is required to be affected by this issue."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Palo Alto Networks thanks Tan Inn Fung, Yu Ann Ong, Zhang Bosen from the GovTech Cybersecurity Group for discovering and reporting this issue."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-11-12T17:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma\u00ae Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser\u2019s security controls."
}
],
"value": "An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma\u00ae Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser\u2019s security controls."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Palo Alto Networks is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this issue."
}
],
"value": "Palo Alto Networks is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this issue."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-475",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-475 Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NO",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 1.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "UNREPORTED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "AMBER",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "DIFFUSE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-14T18:43:08.447Z",
"orgId": "d6c1279f-00f6-4ef7-9217-f89ffe703ec0",
"shortName": "palo_alto"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2025-4616"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003ctable class=\"tbl\"\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth\u003eVersion\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth\u003eMinor Version\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth\u003eSuggested Solution\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003ePrisma Browser\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eUpgrade to\u0026nbsp;142.15.6.60 \u0026nbsp;or later.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Version\nMinor Version\nSuggested Solution\nPrisma BrowserUpgrade to\u00a0142.15.6.60 \u00a0or later."
}
],
"source": {
"defect": [
"TW-29034"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-12T17:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial Publication"
}
],
"title": "Prisma Browser: Insufficient Validation of Untrusted Input Vulnerability in Prisma Browser",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "No workaround or mitigation is available."
}
],
"value": "No workaround or mitigation is available."
}
],
"x_affectedList": [
"Prisma Browser 140.26.0",
"Prisma Browser 140.26.1",
"Prisma Browser 140.26.2",
"Prisma Browser 140.26.3"
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d6c1279f-00f6-4ef7-9217-f89ffe703ec0",
"assignerShortName": "palo_alto",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-4616",
"datePublished": "2025-11-14T17:33:21.420Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-12T22:05:14.544Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T20:39:22.564Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-4418 (GCVE-0-2025-4418)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-12 19:37 – Updated: 2025-06-12 19:54
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Summary
An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability exists in
AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploited,
could allow a miscreant with elevated privileges to modify PI Connector
for CygNet local data files (cache and buffers) in a way that causes the
connector service to become unresponsive.
Severity
4.4 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVEVA | PI Connector for CygNet |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.6.14
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-4418",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-12T19:53:58.062161Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T19:54:54.525Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PI Connector for CygNet",
"vendor": "AVEVA",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.6.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "AVEVA reported these vulnerabilities to CISA."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability exists in \n\nAVEVA\u0026nbsp;PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploited, \ncould allow a miscreant with elevated privileges to modify PI Connector \nfor CygNet local data files (cache and buffers) in a way that causes the\n connector service to become unresponsive."
}
],
"value": "An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability exists in \n\nAVEVA\u00a0PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploited, \ncould allow a miscreant with elevated privileges to modify PI Connector \nfor CygNet local data files (cache and buffers) in a way that causes the\n connector service to become unresponsive."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 4.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T19:37:46.740Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-162-09"
},
{
"url": "https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAVEVA recommends that organizations evaluate the impact of these \nvulnerabilities based on their operational environment, architecture, \nand product implementation. Users of affected product versions should \napply security updates to mitigate the risk of exploit.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll affected versions of PI Connector for CygNet can be fixed by upgrading to PI Connector for CygNet v1.7.0 or higher. From \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://my.osisoft.com/\"\u003eOSISoft Customer Portal\u003c/a\u003e, search for \"PI Connector for CygNet\" and select Version 1.7.0 or higher.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\nFor additional information please refer to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/\"\u003eAVEVA-2025-002\u003c/a\u003e.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "AVEVA recommends that organizations evaluate the impact of these \nvulnerabilities based on their operational environment, architecture, \nand product implementation. Users of affected product versions should \napply security updates to mitigate the risk of exploit.\n\nAll affected versions of PI Connector for CygNet can be fixed by upgrading to PI Connector for CygNet v1.7.0 or higher. From OSISoft Customer Portal https://my.osisoft.com/ , search for \"PI Connector for CygNet\" and select Version 1.7.0 or higher.\n\n\n\n\n\nFor additional information please refer to AVEVA-2025-002 https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/ ."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-25-162-09",
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAVEVA further recommends users follow general defensive measures:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEnsure that PI Connector for CygNet administrative access is only provided to trusted entities.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAudit custom installation folder Access Control Lists (ACLs) to ensure access is only provided to trusted entities.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAudit and limit membership to the OS Local \"Administrators\" and \"PI Connector Administrators\" groups.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor additional information please refer to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/\"\u003eAVEVA-2025-002\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "AVEVA further recommends users follow general defensive measures:\n\n\n\n * Ensure that PI Connector for CygNet administrative access is only provided to trusted entities.\n\n * Audit custom installation folder Access Control Lists (ACLs) to ensure access is only provided to trusted entities.\n\n * Audit and limit membership to the OS Local \"Administrators\" and \"PI Connector Administrators\" groups.\n\n\n\n\nFor additional information please refer to AVEVA-2025-002 https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/ \n\n."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-4418",
"datePublished": "2025-06-12T19:37:46.740Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-07T18:16:55.551Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T19:54:54.525Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-3479 (GCVE-0-2025-3479)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-17 11:13 – Updated: 2026-04-08 17:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Forminator <= 1.42.0 - Order Replay Vulnerability
Summary
The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Order Replay in all versions up to, and including, 1.42.0 via the 'handle_stripe_single' function due to insufficient validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single Stripe PaymentIntent for multiple transactions. Only the first transaction is processed via Stripe, but the plugin sends a successful email message for each transaction, which may trick an administrator into fulfilling each order.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| wpmudev | Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.42.0
(semver)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-3479",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-17T13:29:08.657207Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-17T13:39:51.779Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Forminator Forms \u2013 Contact Form, Payment Form \u0026 Custom Form Builder",
"vendor": "wpmudev",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.42.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Asaf Mozes"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Forminator Forms \u2013 Contact Form, Payment Form \u0026 Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Order Replay in all versions up to, and including, 1.42.0 via the \u0027handle_stripe_single\u0027 function due to insufficient validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single Stripe PaymentIntent for multiple transactions. Only the first transaction is processed via Stripe, but the plugin sends a successful email message for each transaction, which may trick an administrator into fulfilling each order."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:21:34.121Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c873c04e-516e-41ee-a295-b8c5235abc1b?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/forminator/tags/1.41.2/library/modules/custom-forms/front/front-action.php#L964"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3274844/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-16T22:33:04.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Forminator \u003c= 1.42.0 - Order Replay Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-3479",
"datePublished": "2025-04-17T11:13:06.397Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-09T19:48:06.225Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:21:34.121Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-3247 (GCVE-0-2025-3247)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-16 05:23 – Updated: 2026-04-08 16:46
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Contact Form 7 <= 6.0.5 - Order Replay Vulnerability
Summary
The Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Order Replay in all versions up to, and including, 6.0.5 via the 'wpcf7_stripe_skip_spam_check' function due to insufficient validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single Stripe PaymentIntent for multiple transactions. Only the first transaction is processed via Stripe, but the plugin sends a successful email message for each transaction, which may trick an administrator into fulfilling each order.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rocklobsterinc | Contact Form 7 |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 6.0.5
(semver)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-3247",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-16T13:23:21.654939Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-16T13:23:45.320Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Contact Form 7",
"vendor": "rocklobsterinc",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Asaf Mozes"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Order Replay in all versions up to, and including, 6.0.5 via the \u0027wpcf7_stripe_skip_spam_check\u0027 function due to insufficient validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single Stripe PaymentIntent for multiple transactions. Only the first transaction is processed via Stripe, but the plugin sends a successful email message for each transaction, which may trick an administrator into fulfilling each order."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T16:46:27.696Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/38257dbf-288e-4028-af65-85f5389888ac?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/contact-form-7/tags/6.0.5/modules/stripe/stripe.php#L114"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3270138/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-15T16:56:22.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Contact Form 7 \u003c= 6.0.5 - Order Replay Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-3247",
"datePublished": "2025-04-16T05:23:00.706Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-04T00:06:57.248Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T16:46:27.696Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-48930 (GCVE-0-2024-48930)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-10-21 15:41 – Updated: 2024-10-21 16:44
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
secp256k1-node vulnerable to private key extraction over ECDH
Summary
secp256k1-node is a Node.js binding for an Optimized C library for EC operations on curve secp256k1. In `elliptic`-based version, `loadUncompressedPublicKey` has a check that the public key is on the curve. Prior to versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1, however, `loadCompressedPublicKey` is missing that check. That allows the attacker to use public keys on low-cardinality curves to extract enough information to fully restore the private key from as little as 11 ECDH sessions, and very cheaply on compute power. Other operations on public keys are also affected, including e.g. `publicKeyVerify()` incorrectly returning `true` on those invalid keys, and e.g. `publicKeyTweakMul()` also returning predictable outcomes allowing to restore the tweak. Versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1 contain a fix for the issue.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
6 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/se… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/co… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/co… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/co… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/bl… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/bl… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cryptocoinjs | secp256k1-node |
Affected:
= 5.0.0
Affected: >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.4 Affected: < 3.8.1 |
|
| secp256k1-node_project | secp256k1-node |
Affected:
5.0.0
Affected: 4.0.0 , < 4.0.4 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 3.8.1 (custom) cpe:2.3:a:secp256k1-node_project:secp256k1-node:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:secp256k1-node_project:secp256k1-node:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "secp256k1-node",
"vendor": "secp256k1-node_project",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.0.0"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.0.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "3.8.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-48930",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-21T16:36:50.720373Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-21T16:44:50.415Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "secp256k1-node",
"vendor": "cryptocoinjs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "= 5.0.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.0.4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.8.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "secp256k1-node is a Node.js binding for an Optimized C library for EC operations on curve secp256k1. In `elliptic`-based version, `loadUncompressedPublicKey` has a check that the public key is on the curve. Prior to versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1, however, `loadCompressedPublicKey` is missing that check. That allows the attacker to use public keys on low-cardinality curves to extract enough information to fully restore the private key from as little as 11 ECDH sessions, and very cheaply on compute power. Other operations on public keys are also affected, including e.g. `publicKeyVerify()` incorrectly returning `true` on those invalid keys, and e.g. `publicKeyTweakMul()` also returning predictable outcomes allowing to restore the tweak. Versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1 contain a fix for the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-21T15:41:41.999Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/security/advisories/GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/security/advisories/GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/commit/8bd6446e000fa59df3cda0ae3e424300747ea5ed",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/commit/8bd6446e000fa59df3cda0ae3e424300747ea5ed"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/commit/9a15fff274f83a6ec7f675f1121babcc0c42292f",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/commit/9a15fff274f83a6ec7f675f1121babcc0c42292f"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/commit/e256905ee649a7caacc251f7c964667195a52221",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/commit/e256905ee649a7caacc251f7c964667195a52221"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/blob/6d3474b81d073cc9c8cc8cfadb580c84f8df5248/lib/elliptic.js#L17-L19",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/blob/6d3474b81d073cc9c8cc8cfadb580c84f8df5248/lib/elliptic.js#L17-L19"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/blob/6d3474b81d073cc9c8cc8cfadb580c84f8df5248/lib/elliptic.js#L37-L39",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cryptocoinjs/secp256k1-node/blob/6d3474b81d073cc9c8cc8cfadb580c84f8df5248/lib/elliptic.js#L37-L39"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-584q-6j8j-r5pm",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "secp256k1-node vulnerable to private key extraction over ECDH"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-48930",
"datePublished": "2024-10-21T15:41:41.999Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-10-09T22:06:46.175Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-21T16:44:50.415Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Implementation
Ensure that the checksums present in messages are properly checked in accordance with the protocol specification before they are parsed and used.
CAPEC-145: Checksum Spoofing
An adversary spoofs a checksum message for the purpose of making a payload appear to have a valid corresponding checksum. Checksums are used to verify message integrity. They consist of some value based on the value of the message they are protecting. Hash codes are a common checksum mechanism. Both the sender and recipient are able to compute the checksum based on the contents of the message. If the message contents change between the sender and recipient, the sender and recipient will compute different checksum values. Since the sender's checksum value is transmitted with the message, the recipient would know that a modification occurred. In checksum spoofing an adversary modifies the message body and then modifies the corresponding checksum so that the recipient's checksum calculation will match the checksum (created by the adversary) in the message. This would prevent the recipient from realizing that a change occurred.
CAPEC-463: Padding Oracle Crypto Attack
An adversary is able to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key if a target system leaks data on whether or not a padding error happened while decrypting the ciphertext. A target system that leaks this type of information becomes the padding oracle and an adversary is able to make use of that oracle to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key by issuing on average 128*b calls to the padding oracle (where b is the number of bytes in the ciphertext block). In addition to performing decryption, an adversary is also able to produce valid ciphertexts (i.e., perform encryption) by using the padding oracle, all without knowing the encryption key.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.