CWE-401
AllowedMissing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime
Abstraction: Variant · Status: Draft
The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.
2013 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-XXH7-FCF3-RJ7F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-05 21:27 – Updated: 2026-03-05 21:27Description (as reported)
There is a memory leak when using GzipHandler in jetty-12.0.30 that can cause off-heap OOMs. This can be used for DoS attacks so I'm reporting this as a vulnerability.
The leak is created by requests where the request is inflated (Content-Encoding: gzip) and the response is not deflated (no Accept-Encoding: gzip). In these conditions, a new inflator will be created by GzipRequest and never released back into GzipRequest.__inflaterPool because gzipRequest.destory() is not called.
In heap dumps one can see thousands of java.util.zip.Inflator objects, which use both Java heaps and native memory. Leaking native memory causes of off-heap OOMs.
Code path in GzipHandler.handle():
1. Line 601: GzipRequest is created when request inflation is needed.
2. Lines 611-616: The callback is only wrapped in GzipResponseAndCallback when both inflation and deflation are needed.
3. Lines 619-625: If the handler accepts the request (returns true), gzipRequest.destroy() is only called in the "request not accepted" path (returns false)
When deflation is needed, GzipResponseAndCallback (lines 102 and 116) properly calls gzipRequest.destroy() in its succeeded() and failed() methods. But this wrapper is only created when deflation is needed.
Possible fix:
The callback should be wrapped whenever a GzipRequest is created, not just when deflation is needed. This ensures gzipRequest.destroy() is always called when the request completes.
Impact
The leak causes the JVM to crash with OOME.
Patches
No patches yet.
Workarounds
Disable GzipHandler.
References
https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/issues/14260
https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/issues/79
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 12.1.5"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "12.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "12.1.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 12.0.31"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "12.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "12.0.32"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-1605"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400",
"CWE-401"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-05T21:27:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-05T10:15:56Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Description (as reported)\n\nThere is a memory leak when using `GzipHandler` in jetty-12.0.30 that can cause off-heap OOMs. This can be used for DoS attacks so I\u0027m reporting this as a vulnerability.\n\nThe leak is created by requests where the request is inflated (`Content-Encoding: gzip`) and the response is not deflated (no `Accept-Encoding: gzip`). In these conditions, a new inflator will be created by `GzipRequest` and never released back into `GzipRequest.__inflaterPool` because `gzipRequest.destory()` is not called.\n\nIn heap dumps one can see thousands of `java.util.zip.Inflator` objects, which use both Java heaps and native memory. Leaking native memory causes of off-heap OOMs.\n\nCode path in `GzipHandler.handle()`:\n1. Line 601: `GzipRequest` is created when request inflation is needed.\n2. Lines 611-616: The callback is only wrapped in `GzipResponseAndCallback` when both inflation and deflation are needed.\n3. Lines 619-625: If the handler accepts the request (returns true), `gzipRequest.destroy()` is only called in the \"request not accepted\" path (returns false)\n\nWhen deflation is needed, `GzipResponseAndCallback` (lines 102 and 116) properly calls `gzipRequest.destroy()` in its `succeeded()` and `failed()` methods. But this wrapper is only created when deflation is needed.\n\nPossible fix:\nThe callback should be wrapped whenever a `GzipRequest` is created, not just when deflation is needed. This ensures `gzipRequest.destroy()` is always called when the request completes.\n\n\n### Impact\nThe leak causes the JVM to crash with OOME.\n\n### Patches\nNo patches yet.\n\n### Workarounds\nDisable `GzipHandler`.\n\n### References\nhttps://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/issues/14260\n\nhttps://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/issues/79",
"id": "GHSA-xxh7-fcf3-rj7f",
"modified": "2026-03-05T21:27:59Z",
"published": "2026-03-05T21:27:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-xxh7-fcf3-rj7f"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1605"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/issues/14260"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/issues/79"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "The Eclipse Jetty Server Artifact has a Gzip request memory leak "
}
GHSA-XXQJ-98Q4-MP83
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:49 – Updated: 2023-03-02 18:30ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has memory leaks at AcquireMagickMemory because of an error in MagickWand/mogrify.c.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-13310"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-401"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-05T01:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "ImageMagick 7.0.8-50 Q16 has memory leaks at AcquireMagickMemory because of an error in MagickWand/mogrify.c.",
"id": "GHSA-xxqj-98q4-mp83",
"modified": "2023-03-02T18:30:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:49:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-13310"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/1616"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/5f21230b657ccd65452dd3d94c5b5401ba691a2d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick6/commit/5982632109cad48bc6dab867298fdea4dea57c51"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4192-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00069.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XXVW-MMRH-6CR5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-20 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-17 21:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/v3d: Add job to pending list if the reset was skipped
When a CL/CSD job times out, we check if the GPU has made any progress since the last timeout. If so, instead of resetting the hardware, we skip the reset and let the timer get rearmed. This gives long-running jobs a chance to complete.
However, when timedout_job() is called, the job in question is removed
from the pending list, which means it won't be automatically freed through
free_job(). Consequently, when we skip the reset and keep the job
running, the job won't be freed when it finally completes.
This situation leads to a memory leak, as exposed in [1] and [2].
Similarly to commit 704d3d60fec4 ("drm/etnaviv: don't block scheduler when GPU is still active"), this patch ensures the job is put back on the pending list when extending the timeout.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-37951"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-401"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-20T16:15:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/v3d: Add job to pending list if the reset was skipped\n\nWhen a CL/CSD job times out, we check if the GPU has made any progress\nsince the last timeout. If so, instead of resetting the hardware, we skip\nthe reset and let the timer get rearmed. This gives long-running jobs a\nchance to complete.\n\nHowever, when `timedout_job()` is called, the job in question is removed\nfrom the pending list, which means it won\u0027t be automatically freed through\n`free_job()`. Consequently, when we skip the reset and keep the job\nrunning, the job won\u0027t be freed when it finally completes.\n\nThis situation leads to a memory leak, as exposed in [1] and [2].\n\nSimilarly to commit 704d3d60fec4 (\"drm/etnaviv: don\u0027t block scheduler when\nGPU is still active\"), this patch ensures the job is put back on the\npending list when extending the timeout.",
"id": "GHSA-xxvw-mmrh-6cr5",
"modified": "2025-12-17T21:30:29Z",
"published": "2025-05-20T18:30:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37951"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12125f7d9c15e6d8ac91d10373b2db2f17dcf767"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35e4079bf1a2570abffce6ababa631afcf8ea0e5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/422a8b10ba42097a704d6909ada2956f880246f2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5235b56b7e5449d990d21d78723b1a5e7bb5738e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a5f162727b91e480656da1876247a91f651f76de"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/08/msg00010.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-41
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Choose a language or tool that provides automatic memory management, or makes manual memory management less error-prone.
- For example, glibc in Linux provides protection against free of invalid pointers.
- When using Xcode to target OS X or iOS, enable automatic reference counting (ARC) [REF-391].
- To help correctly and consistently manage memory when programming in C++, consider using a smart pointer class such as std::auto_ptr (defined by ISO/IEC ISO/IEC 14882:2003), std::shared_ptr and std::unique_ptr (specified by an upcoming revision of the C++ standard, informally referred to as C++ 1x), or equivalent solutions such as Boost.
Mitigation
Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Mitigation
Consider using the Boehm-Demers-Weiser garbage collector (bdwgc), which can help avoid leaks.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.