CWE-311
Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
The product does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission.
CVE-2023-52950 (GCVE-0-2023-52950)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-09-26 03:40 – Updated: 2024-11-15 17:34
VLAI
Summary
Missing encryption of sensitive data vulnerability in login component in Synology Active Backup for Business Agent before 2.7.0-3221 allows adjacent man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain user credential via unspecified vectors.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.synology.com/en-global/security/advis… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synology | Synology Active Backup for Business Agent |
Affected:
* , < 2.7.0-3221
(semver)
|
|
| synology | active_backup_for_business_agent |
Affected:
0 , < 2.7.0-3221
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:synology:active_backup_for_business_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:synology:active_backup_for_business_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "active_backup_for_business_agent",
"vendor": "synology",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.7.0-3221",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52950",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-26T14:39:13.831688Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-15T17:34:23.550Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Synology Active Backup for Business Agent",
"vendor": "Synology",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.7.0-3221",
"status": "affected",
"version": "*",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Zhao Runzi (\u8d75\u6da6\u6893)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Missing encryption of sensitive data vulnerability in login component in Synology Active Backup for Business Agent before 2.7.0-3221 allows adjacent man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain user credential via unspecified vectors."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-26T03:40:25.753Z",
"orgId": "db201096-a0cc-46c7-9a55-61d9e221bf01",
"shortName": "synology"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Synology-SA-24:11 Synology Active Backup for Business Agent",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.synology.com/en-global/security/advisory/Synology_SA_24_11"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "db201096-a0cc-46c7-9a55-61d9e221bf01",
"assignerShortName": "synology",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52950",
"datePublished": "2024-09-26T03:40:25.753Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-09-24T08:35:52.122Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-11-15T17:34:23.550Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-6339 (GCVE-0-2023-6339)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-01-02 21:44 – Updated: 2025-06-03 14:45
VLAI
Title
Google Nest WiFi Pro root code-execution & user-data compromise
Summary
Google Nest WiFi Pro root code-execution & user-data compromise
Severity
10 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
1 reference
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T08:28:21.298Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://support.google.com/product-documentation/answer/14273332?hl=en\u0026ref_topic=12974021\u0026sjid=4533873659772963473-NA"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-6339",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-05-08T18:42:14.180936Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-03T14:45:15.471Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Wifi Pro",
"vendor": "Google",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "14150"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Google Nest WiFi Pro root code-execution \u0026amp; user-data compromise"
}
],
"value": "Google Nest WiFi Pro root code-execution \u0026 user-data compromise"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-175",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-175 Code Inclusion"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 10,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311 Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-01-02T21:44:05.703Z",
"orgId": "83238938-5644-45f0-9007-c0392bcf6222",
"shortName": "Google_Devices"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://support.google.com/product-documentation/answer/14273332?hl=en\u0026ref_topic=12974021\u0026sjid=4533873659772963473-NA"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Google Nest WiFi Pro root code-execution \u0026 user-data compromise",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83238938-5644-45f0-9007-c0392bcf6222",
"assignerShortName": "Google_Devices",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-6339",
"datePublished": "2024-01-02T21:44:05.703Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-11-27T22:21:29.137Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-03T14:45:15.471Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-20515 (GCVE-0-2024-20515)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-10-02 16:55 – Updated: 2024-10-02 17:26
VLAI
Title
Cisco Identity Services Engine Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Summary
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from an affected device.
This vulnerability is due to a lack of proper data protection mechanisms for certain configuration settings. An attacker with Read-Only Administrator privileges could exploit this vulnerability by browsing to a page that contains sensitive data. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view device credentials that are normally not visible to Read-Only Administrators.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco | Cisco Identity Services Engine Software |
Affected:
3.0.0
Affected: 3.0.0 p1 Affected: 3.0.0 p2 Affected: 3.0.0 p3 Affected: 3.1.0 Affected: 3.0.0 p4 Affected: 3.1.0 p1 Affected: 3.0.0 p5 Affected: 3.1.0 p3 Affected: 3.1.0 p2 Affected: 3.0.0 p6 Affected: 3.2.0 Affected: 3.1.0 p4 Affected: 2.7.0 p8 Affected: 3.1.0 p5 Affected: 3.2.0 p1 Affected: 3.0.0 p7 Affected: 3.1.0 p6 Affected: 3.2.0 p2 Affected: 3.1.0 p7 Affected: 3.3.0 Affected: 3.2.0 p3 Affected: 3.0.0 p8 Affected: 3.2.0 p4 Affected: 3.1.0 p8 Affected: 3.2.0 p5 Affected: 3.2.0 p6 Affected: 3.3 Patch 2 Affected: 3.3 Patch 1 Affected: 3.3 Patch 3 Affected: 3.4.0 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-20515",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-10-02T17:17:51.875595Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-02T17:26:00.279Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Cisco Identity Services Engine Software",
"vendor": "Cisco",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0 p1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0 p2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0 p3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0 p4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0 p1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0 p5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0 p3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0 p2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0 p6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0 p4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.7.0 p8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0 p5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0 p1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0 p7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0 p6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0 p2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0 p7"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0 p3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0 p8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0 p4"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.1.0 p8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0 p5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.2.0 p6"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3 Patch 2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3 Patch 1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.3 Patch 3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from an affected device.\r\n\r\nThis vulnerability is due to a lack of proper data protection mechanisms for certain configuration settings. An attacker with Read-Only Administrator privileges could exploit this vulnerability by browsing to a page that contains sensitive data. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view device credentials that are normally not visible to Read-Only Administrators."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Cisco PSIRT is not aware of any public announcements or malicious use of the vulnerability that is described in this advisory."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "cvssV3_1"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "cwe"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-02T16:55:42.529Z",
"orgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"shortName": "cisco"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "cisco-sa-ise-info-disc-ZYF2nEEX",
"url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-ise-info-disc-ZYF2nEEX"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "cisco-sa-ise-info-disc-ZYF2nEEX",
"defects": [
"CSCwj04194"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Cisco Identity Services Engine Information Disclosure Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d1c1063e-7a18-46af-9102-31f8928bc633",
"assignerShortName": "cisco",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-20515",
"datePublished": "2024-10-02T16:55:42.529Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-11-08T15:08:07.689Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-02T17:26:00.279Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-23444 (GCVE-0-2024-23444)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-07-31 17:26 – Updated: 2025-04-04 23:03
VLAI
Title
Elasticsearch elasticsearch-certutil csr fails to encrypt private key
Summary
It was discovered by Elastic engineering that when elasticsearch-certutil CLI tool is used with the csr option in order to create a new Certificate Signing Requests, the associated private key that is generated is stored on disk unencrypted even if the --pass parameter is passed in the command invocation.
Severity
4.9 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic | Elasticsearch |
Affected:
7.x , < 7.17.23
(custom)
Affected: 8.x , < 8.13.0 (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-23444",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-31T18:45:22.621905Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-31T18:45:42.985Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-04T23:03:01.974Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250404-0001/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Elasticsearch",
"vendor": "Elastic",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.17.23",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.x",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.13.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.x",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cb\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003eIt was discovered by Elastic engineering that when \u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003eelasticsearch-certutil\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003e CLI tool is used with the \u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003ecsr\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003e option in order to create a new Certificate Signing Requests, the associated private key that is generated is stored on disk unencrypted even if the \u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003e--pass\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: transparent;\"\u003e parameter is passed in the command invocation.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "It was discovered by Elastic engineering that when elasticsearch-certutil CLI tool is used with the csr option in order to create a new Certificate Signing Requests, the associated private key that is generated is stored on disk unencrypted even if the --pass parameter is passed in the command invocation."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311 Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-31T17:26:12.784Z",
"orgId": "271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a",
"shortName": "elastic"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/elasticsearch-8-13-0-7-17-23-security-update-esa-2024-12/364157"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Elasticsearch elasticsearch-certutil csr fails to encrypt private key",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a",
"assignerShortName": "elastic",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-23444",
"datePublished": "2024-07-31T17:26:12.784Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-01-16T21:31:26.029Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-04T23:03:01.974Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-25027 (GCVE-0-2024-25027)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-03-31 11:40 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:53
VLAI
Title
IBM Security Verify Access Container information disclosure
Summary
IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.6 could disclose sensitive snapshot information due to missing encryption. IBM X-Force ID: 281607.
Severity
6.2 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
3 references
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Security Verify Access Docker |
Affected:
10.0.6
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-25027",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-07-01T16:45:51.394878Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-01T16:46:49.860Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:53:54.352Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7145400"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/281607"
},
{
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Nov/0"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Security Verify Access Docker",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.0.6"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.6 could disclose sensitive snapshot information due to missing encryption. IBM X-Force ID: 281607."
}
],
"value": "IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.6 could disclose sensitive snapshot information due to missing encryption. IBM X-Force ID: 281607."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311 Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-03-31T11:40:11.155Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7145400"
},
{
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/281607"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "IBM Security Verify Access Container information disclosure",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-25027",
"datePublished": "2024-03-31T11:40:11.155Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-03T14:49:11.962Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T21:53:54.352Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2024-25630 (GCVE-0-2024-25630)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-02-20 17:53 – Updated: 2024-08-01 23:44
VLAI
Title
Cilium has unencrypted ingress/health traffic when using Wireguard transparent encryption
Summary
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who are using CRDs to store Cilium state (the default configuration) and Wireguard transparent encryption, traffic to/from the Ingress and health endpoints is not encrypted. This issue affects Cilium v1.14 before v1.14.7 and has been patched in Cilium v1.14.7. There is no workaround to this issue.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-25630",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-02-20T19:25:14.648426Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-07-05T17:21:48.450Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T23:44:09.747Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-7496-fgv9-xw82",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-7496-fgv9-xw82"
},
{
"name": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/#encryption-wg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/#encryption-wg"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.7"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who are using CRDs to store Cilium state (the default configuration) and Wireguard transparent encryption, traffic to/from the Ingress and health endpoints is not encrypted. This issue affects Cilium v1.14 before v1.14.7 and has been patched in Cilium v1.14.7. There is no workaround to this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-02-20T17:53:16.685Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-7496-fgv9-xw82",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-7496-fgv9-xw82"
},
{
"name": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/#encryption-wg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/#encryption-wg"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7496-fgv9-xw82",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Cilium has unencrypted ingress/health traffic when using Wireguard transparent encryption"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-25630",
"datePublished": "2024-02-20T17:53:16.685Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-08T22:26:33.512Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T23:44:09.747Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-25631 (GCVE-0-2024-25631)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-02-20 18:08 – Updated: 2024-08-26 14:46
VLAI
Title
Unencrypted traffic between pods when using Wireguard and an external kvstore
Summary
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who have enabled an external kvstore and Wireguard transparent encryption, traffic between pods in the affected cluster is not encrypted. This issue affects Cilium v1.14 before v1.14.7 and has been patched in Cilium v1.14.7. There is no workaround to this issue.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/installation/k8s… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-01T23:44:09.675Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-x989-52fc-4vr4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-x989-52fc-4vr4"
},
{
"name": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/installation/k8s-install-external-etcd/#when-do-i-need-to-use-a-kvstore",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/installation/k8s-install-external-etcd/#when-do-i-need-to-use-a-kvstore"
},
{
"name": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/#encryption-wg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/#encryption-wg"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:cilium:cilium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.14.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-25631",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-02-21T19:40:06.425184Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-26T14:46:55.989Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.14.7"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who have enabled an external kvstore and Wireguard transparent encryption, traffic between pods in the affected cluster is not encrypted. This issue affects Cilium v1.14 before v1.14.7 and has been patched in Cilium v1.14.7. There is no workaround to this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-02-20T18:08:56.946Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-x989-52fc-4vr4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-x989-52fc-4vr4"
},
{
"name": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/installation/k8s-install-external-etcd/#when-do-i-need-to-use-a-kvstore",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/installation/k8s-install-external-etcd/#when-do-i-need-to-use-a-kvstore"
},
{
"name": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/#encryption-wg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/security/network/encryption-wireguard/#encryption-wg"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.7"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-x989-52fc-4vr4",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Unencrypted traffic between pods when using Wireguard and an external kvstore"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-25631",
"datePublished": "2024-02-20T18:08:56.946Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-08T22:26:33.512Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-26T14:46:55.989Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-27106 (GCVE-0-2024-27106)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-14 17:01 – Updated: 2024-08-02 00:27
VLAI
Title
Vulnerable data in transit in GE HealthCare EchoPAC products
Summary
Vulnerable data in transit in GE HealthCare EchoPAC products
Severity
5.7 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
6 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE HealthCare | EchoPAC Software Only |
Affected:
0
|
|
| GE HealthCare | ImageVault |
Affected:
0
|
|
| GE HealthCare | EchoPAC Turnkey |
Affected:
0
|
|
| gehealthcare | image_vault |
Affected:
-
cpe:2.3:h:gehealthcare:image_vault:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| gehealthcare | echopac_software |
Affected:
-
cpe:2.3:a:gehealthcare:echopac_software:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| gehealthcare | echopac_turnkey |
Affected:
-
cpe:2.3:a:gehealthcare:echopac_turnkey:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:h:gehealthcare:image_vault:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "image_vault",
"vendor": "gehealthcare",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "-"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gehealthcare:echopac_software:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "echopac_software",
"vendor": "gehealthcare",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "-"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gehealthcare:echopac_turnkey:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "echopac_turnkey",
"vendor": "gehealthcare",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "-"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-27106",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-05-14T19:31:29.049031Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-04T17:46:22.979Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:27:59.190Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://securityupdate.gehealthcare.com/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "EchoPAC Software Only",
"vendor": "GE HealthCare",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ImageVault",
"vendor": "GE HealthCare",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "EchoPAC Turnkey",
"vendor": "GE HealthCare",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Andrea Palanca and Gabriele Quagliarella of Nozomi Networks"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Vulnerable data in transit in GE HealthCare EchoPAC products"
}
],
"value": "Vulnerable data in transit in GE HealthCare EchoPAC products"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-157",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-157 Sniffing Attacks"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311 Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-05-14T17:01:22.488Z",
"orgId": "171caf72-b841-4e04-a68e-93493aff2b94",
"shortName": "GEHC"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://securityupdate.gehealthcare.com/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Vulnerable data in transit in GE HealthCare EchoPAC products",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "171caf72-b841-4e04-a68e-93493aff2b94",
"assignerShortName": "GEHC",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-27106",
"datePublished": "2024-05-14T17:01:22.488Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-02-19T15:22:56.572Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:27:59.190Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-28249 (GCVE-0-2024-28249)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-03-18 21:36 – Updated: 2024-08-02 00:48
VLAI
Title
Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using IPsec and L7 policies
Summary
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.13.13, 1.14.8, and 1.15.2, in Cilium clusters with IPsec enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies, IPsec-eligible traffic between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and IPsec-eligible traffic between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.15.2, 1.14.8, and 1.13.13. There is no known workaround for this issue.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-28249",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-03-19T14:34:32.978403Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-04T18:03:57.880Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:48:49.660Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.13.13"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.13.13, 1.14.8, and 1.15.2, in Cilium clusters with IPsec enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies, IPsec-eligible traffic between a node\u0027s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and IPsec-eligible traffic between a node\u0027s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.15.2, 1.14.8, and 1.13.13. There is no known workaround for this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-03-18T21:36:10.510Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-j89h-qrvr-xc36",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using IPsec and L7 policies"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-28249",
"datePublished": "2024-03-18T21:36:10.510Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-03-07T14:33:30.036Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:48:49.660Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2024-28250 (GCVE-0-2024-28250)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-03-18 21:42 – Updated: 2024-08-02 00:48
VLAI
Title
Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
Summary
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue.
Severity
6.1 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-311 - Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-28250",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-03-19T14:36:42.524251Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-04T18:03:15.198Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:48:49.605Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "cilium",
"vendor": "cilium",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.14.0, \u003c 1.14.8"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.15.0, \u003c 1.15.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node\u0027s DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (`routingMode=native`) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (`routingMode=tunnel`). Not that in tunneling mode, `encryption.wireguard.encapsulate` must be set to `true`. There is no known workaround for this issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-311",
"description": "CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-03-18T21:42:21.689Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-28250",
"datePublished": "2024-03-18T21:42:21.689Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-03-07T14:33:30.036Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T00:48:49.605Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Requirements
Description:
- Clearly specify which data or resources are valuable enough that they should be protected by encryption. Require that any transmission or storage of this data/resource should use well-vetted encryption algorithms.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Ensure that encryption is properly integrated into the system design, including but not necessarily limited to:
- Identify the separate needs and contexts for encryption:
- Using threat modeling or other techniques, assume that data can be compromised through a separate vulnerability or weakness, and determine where encryption will be most effective. Ensure that data that should be private is not being inadvertently exposed using weaknesses such as insecure permissions (CWE-732). [REF-7]
- {'xhtml:li': ['Encryption that is needed to store or transmit private data of the users of the system', 'Encryption that is needed to protect the system itself from unauthorized disclosure or tampering']}
- {'xhtml:li': ['One-way (i.e., only the user or recipient needs to have the key). This can be achieved using public key cryptography, or other techniques in which the encrypting party (i.e., the product) does not need to have access to a private key.', 'Two-way (i.e., the encryption can be automatically performed on behalf of a user, but the key must be available so that the plaintext can be automatically recoverable by that user). This requires storage of the private key in a format that is recoverable only by the user (or perhaps by the operating system) in a way that cannot be recovered by others.']}
Mitigation ID: MIT-24
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis.
- For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification.
- Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak.
- Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]
Mitigation ID: MIT-46
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Separation of Privilege
Description:
- Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
- Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
Mitigation ID: MIT-25
Phases: Implementation, Architecture and Design
Description:
- When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
Mitigation ID: MIT-33
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
CAPEC-157: Sniffing Attacks
In this attack pattern, the adversary intercepts information transmitted between two third parties. The adversary must be able to observe, read, and/or hear the communication traffic, but not necessarily block the communication or change its content. Any transmission medium can theoretically be sniffed if the adversary can examine the contents between the sender and recipient. Sniffing Attacks are similar to Adversary-In-The-Middle attacks (CAPEC-94), but are entirely passive. AiTM attacks are predominantly active and often alter the content of the communications themselves.
CAPEC-158: Sniffing Network Traffic
In this attack pattern, the adversary monitors network traffic between nodes of a public or multicast network in an attempt to capture sensitive information at the protocol level. Network sniffing applications can reveal TCP/IP, DNS, Ethernet, and other low-level network communication information. The adversary takes a passive role in this attack pattern and simply observes and analyzes the traffic. The adversary may precipitate or indirectly influence the content of the observed transaction, but is never the intended recipient of the target information.
CAPEC-204: Lifting Sensitive Data Embedded in Cache
An adversary examines a target application's cache, or a browser cache, for sensitive information. Many applications that communicate with remote entities or which perform intensive calculations utilize caches to improve efficiency. However, if the application computes or receives sensitive information and the cache is not appropriately protected, an attacker can browse the cache and retrieve this information. This can result in the disclosure of sensitive information.
CAPEC-31: Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies
This attack relies on the use of HTTP Cookies to store credentials, state information and other critical data on client systems. There are several different forms of this attack. The first form of this attack involves accessing HTTP Cookies to mine for potentially sensitive data contained therein. The second form involves intercepting this data as it is transmitted from client to server. This intercepted information is then used by the adversary to impersonate the remote user/session. The third form is when the cookie's content is modified by the adversary before it is sent back to the server. Here the adversary seeks to convince the target server to operate on this falsified information.
CAPEC-37: Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data
An attacker examines a target system to find sensitive data that has been embedded within it. This information can reveal confidential contents, such as account numbers or individual keys/credentials that can be used as an intermediate step in a larger attack.
CAPEC-383: Harvesting Information via API Event Monitoring
An adversary hosts an event within an application framework and then monitors the data exchanged during the course of the event for the purpose of harvesting any important data leaked during the transactions. One example could be harvesting lists of usernames or userIDs for the purpose of sending spam messages to those users. One example of this type of attack involves the adversary creating an event within the sub-application. Assume the adversary hosts a "virtual sale" of rare items. As other users enter the event, the attacker records via AiTM (CAPEC-94) proxy the user_ids and usernames of everyone who attends. The adversary would then be able to spam those users within the application using an automated script.
CAPEC-384: Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages. Performing this attack can allow the attacker to gain unauthorized privileges within the application, or conduct attacks such as phishing, deceptive strategies to spread malware, or traditional web-application attacks. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to perform adversary-in-the-middle (CAPEC-94) communications between the web browser and the remote system. Despite the use of AiTH software, the attack is actually directed at the server, as the client is one node in a series of content brokers that pass information along to the application framework. Additionally, it is not true "Adversary-in-the-Middle" attack at the network layer, but an application-layer attack the root cause of which is the master applications trust in the integrity of code supplied by the client.
CAPEC-385: Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
An attacker hosts or joins an event or transaction within an application framework in order to change the content of messages or items that are being exchanged. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that look authentic but may contain deceptive links, substitute one item or another, spoof an existing item and conduct a false exchange, or otherwise change the amounts or identity of what is being exchanged. The techniques require use of specialized software that allow the attacker to man-in-the-middle communications between the web browser and the remote system in order to change the content of various application elements. Often, items exchanged in game can be monetized via sales for coin, virtual dollars, etc. The purpose of the attack is for the attack to scam the victim by trapping the data packets involved the exchange and altering the integrity of the transfer process.
CAPEC-386: Application API Navigation Remapping
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of links/buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains links/buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination. Some applications make navigation remapping more difficult to detect because the actual HREF values of images, profile elements, and links/buttons are masked. One example would be to place an image in a user's photo gallery that when clicked upon redirected the user to an off-site location. Also, traditional web vulnerabilities (such as CSRF) can be constructed with remapped buttons or links. In some cases navigation remapping can be used for Phishing attacks or even means to artificially boost the page view, user site reputation, or click-fraud.
CAPEC-387: Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious Content
An adversary manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the content of messages and thereby circumvent the expected application logic.
CAPEC-388: Application API Button Hijacking
An attacker manipulates either egress or ingress data from a client within an application framework in order to change the destination and/or content of buttons displayed to a user within API messages. Performing this attack allows the attacker to manipulate content in such a way as to produce messages or content that looks authentic but contains buttons that point to an attacker controlled destination.
CAPEC-477: Signature Spoofing by Mixing Signed and Unsigned Content
An attacker exploits the underlying complexity of a data structure that allows for both signed and unsigned content, to cause unsigned data to be processed as though it were signed data.
CAPEC-609: Cellular Traffic Intercept
Cellular traffic for voice and data from mobile devices and retransmission devices can be intercepted via numerous methods. Malicious actors can deploy their own cellular tower equipment and intercept cellular traffic surreptitiously. Additionally, government agencies of adversaries and malicious actors can intercept cellular traffic via the telecommunications backbone over which mobile traffic is transmitted.
CAPEC-65: Sniff Application Code
An adversary passively sniffs network communications and captures application code bound for an authorized client. Once obtained, they can use it as-is, or through reverse-engineering glean sensitive information or exploit the trust relationship between the client and server. Such code may belong to a dynamic update to the client, a patch being applied to a client component or any such interaction where the client is authorized to communicate with the server.