CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
The product does not validate or incorrectly validates the integrity check values or "checksums" of a message. This may prevent it from detecting if the data has been modified or corrupted in transmission.
CVE-2022-25946 (GCVE-0-2022-25946)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-05 16:21 – Updated: 2024-09-17 03:28
VLAI
Summary
On all versions of 16.1.x, 15.1.x, 14.1.x, 13.1.x, 12.1.x, and 11.6.x of F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF, ASM, and ASM, and F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration (GC) all versions prior to 9.0, when running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker with Administrator role privilege may be able to bypass Appliance mode restrictions due to a missing integrity check in F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated
Severity
8.7 (High)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K52322100 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| F5 | BIG-IP (Advanced WAF, APM, ASM) |
Affected:
16.1.x
Affected: 15.1.x Affected: 14.1.x Affected: 13.1.x Affected: 12.1.x Affected: 11.6.x Unaffected: 17.0.0 , < 17.0.x* (custom) |
|
| F5 | BIG-IP Guided Configuration (GC) |
Affected:
All , < 9.0
(custom)
|
Date Public
2022-05-04 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T04:49:44.326Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K52322100"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "BIG-IP (Advanced WAF, APM, ASM)",
"vendor": "F5",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "16.1.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "15.1.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "14.1.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "13.1.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "12.1.x"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "11.6.x"
},
{
"lessThan": "17.0.x*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "17.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"product": "BIG-IP Guided Configuration (GC)",
"vendor": "F5",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "All",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-05-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "On all versions of 16.1.x, 15.1.x, 14.1.x, 13.1.x, 12.1.x, and 11.6.x of F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF, ASM, and ASM, and F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration (GC) all versions prior to 9.0, when running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker with Administrator role privilege may be able to bypass Appliance mode restrictions due to a missing integrity check in F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated"
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-05-05T16:21:26.000Z",
"orgId": "9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab",
"shortName": "f5"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K52322100"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "f5sirt@f5.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2022-05-04T14:00:00.000Z",
"ID": "CVE-2022-25946",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "BIG-IP (Advanced WAF, APM, ASM)",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "!\u003e=",
"version_name": "17.0.x",
"version_value": "17.0.0"
},
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "16.1.x",
"version_value": "16.1.x"
},
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "15.1.x",
"version_value": "15.1.x"
},
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "14.1.x",
"version_value": "14.1.x"
},
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "13.1.x",
"version_value": "13.1.x"
},
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "12.1.x",
"version_value": "12.1.x"
},
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "11.6.x",
"version_value": "11.6.x"
}
]
}
},
{
"product_name": "BIG-IP Guided Configuration (GC)",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "All",
"version_value": "9.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "F5"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "On all versions of 16.1.x, 15.1.x, 14.1.x, 13.1.x, 12.1.x, and 11.6.x of F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF, ASM, and ASM, and F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration (GC) all versions prior to 9.0, when running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker with Administrator role privilege may be able to bypass Appliance mode restrictions due to a missing integrity check in F5 BIG-IP Guided Configuration. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated"
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K52322100",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K52322100"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab",
"assignerShortName": "f5",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-25946",
"datePublished": "2022-05-05T16:21:26.941Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-04-19T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-17T03:28:41.853Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-29173 (GCVE-0-2022-29173)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-05 22:30 – Updated: 2025-04-23 18:31
VLAI
Title
No protection against rollback attacks in go-tuf
Summary
go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). go-tuf does not correctly implement the client workflow for updating the metadata files for roles other than the root role. Specifically, checks for rollback attacks are not implemented correctly meaning an attacker can cause clients to install software that is older than the software which the client previously knew to be available, and may include software with known vulnerabilities. In more detail, the client code of go-tuf has several issues in regards to preventing rollback attacks: 1. It does not take into account the content of any previously trusted metadata, if available, before proceeding with updating roles other than the root role (i.e., steps 5.4.3.1 and 5.5.5 of the detailed client workflow). This means that any form of version verification done on the newly-downloaded metadata is made using the default value of zero, which always passes. 2. For both timestamp and snapshot roles, go-tuf saves these metadata files as trusted before verifying if the version of the metafiles they refer to is correct (i.e., steps 5.5.4 and 5.6.4 of the detailed client workflow). A fix is available in version 0.3.0 or newer. No workarounds are known for this issue apart from upgrading.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/secu… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/comm… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| theupdateframework | go-tuf |
Affected:
< 0.3.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T06:17:54.093Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-66x3-6cw3-v5gj"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/ed6788e710fc3093a7ecc2d078bf734c0f200d8d"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-29173",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T15:53:34.573720Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T18:31:00.276Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "go-tuf",
"vendor": "theupdateframework",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.3.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). go-tuf does not correctly implement the client workflow for updating the metadata files for roles other than the root role. Specifically, checks for rollback attacks are not implemented correctly meaning an attacker can cause clients to install software that is older than the software which the client previously knew to be available, and may include software with known vulnerabilities. In more detail, the client code of go-tuf has several issues in regards to preventing rollback attacks: 1. It does not take into account the content of any previously trusted metadata, if available, before proceeding with updating roles other than the root role (i.e., steps 5.4.3.1 and 5.5.5 of the detailed client workflow). This means that any form of version verification done on the newly-downloaded metadata is made using the default value of zero, which always passes. 2. For both timestamp and snapshot roles, go-tuf saves these metadata files as trusted before verifying if the version of the metafiles they refer to is correct (i.e., steps 5.5.4 and 5.6.4 of the detailed client workflow). A fix is available in version 0.3.0 or newer. No workarounds are known for this issue apart from upgrading."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-05-05T22:30:12.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-66x3-6cw3-v5gj"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/ed6788e710fc3093a7ecc2d078bf734c0f200d8d"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-66x3-6cw3-v5gj",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "No protection against rollback attacks in go-tuf",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-29173",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "No protection against rollback attacks in go-tuf"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "go-tuf",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003c 0.3.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "theupdateframework"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). go-tuf does not correctly implement the client workflow for updating the metadata files for roles other than the root role. Specifically, checks for rollback attacks are not implemented correctly meaning an attacker can cause clients to install software that is older than the software which the client previously knew to be available, and may include software with known vulnerabilities. In more detail, the client code of go-tuf has several issues in regards to preventing rollback attacks: 1. It does not take into account the content of any previously trusted metadata, if available, before proceeding with updating roles other than the root role (i.e., steps 5.4.3.1 and 5.5.5 of the detailed client workflow). This means that any form of version verification done on the newly-downloaded metadata is made using the default value of zero, which always passes. 2. For both timestamp and snapshot roles, go-tuf saves these metadata files as trusted before verifying if the version of the metafiles they refer to is correct (i.e., steps 5.5.4 and 5.6.4 of the detailed client workflow). A fix is available in version 0.3.0 or newer. No workarounds are known for this issue apart from upgrading."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-66x3-6cw3-v5gj",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-66x3-6cw3-v5gj"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/ed6788e710fc3093a7ecc2d078bf734c0f200d8d",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/ed6788e710fc3093a7ecc2d078bf734c0f200d8d"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-66x3-6cw3-v5gj",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-29173",
"datePublished": "2022-05-05T22:30:12.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-04-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T18:31:00.276Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-29898 (GCVE-0-2022-29898)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-05-11 14:25 – Updated: 2024-09-16 19:15
VLAI
Title
Remote Code Execution in all versions of various RAD-ISM-900-EN-* devices by PHOENIX CONTACT
Summary
On various RAD-ISM-900-EN-* devices by PHOENIX CONTACT an admin user could use the configuration file uploader in the WebUI to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the OS due to an improper validation of an integrity check value in all versions of the firmware.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2022-018/ | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHOENIX CONTACT | RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD/B |
Affected:
All Versions
|
|
| PHOENIX CONTACT | RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD |
Affected:
All Versions
|
|
| PHOENIX CONTACT | RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD-BUS |
Affected:
All Versions
|
Date Public
2022-05-11 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T06:33:43.177Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2022-018/"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD/B",
"vendor": "PHOENIX CONTACT",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All Versions"
}
]
},
{
"product": "RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD",
"vendor": "PHOENIX CONTACT",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All Versions"
}
]
},
{
"product": "RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD-BUS",
"vendor": "PHOENIX CONTACT",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All Versions"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The vulnerabilities were discovered and reported by Logan Carpenter of DRAGOS."
}
],
"datePublic": "2022-05-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "On various RAD-ISM-900-EN-* devices by PHOENIX CONTACT an admin user could use the configuration file uploader in the WebUI to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the OS due to an improper validation of an integrity check value in all versions of the firmware."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-05-11T14:25:23.000Z",
"orgId": "270ccfa6-a436-4e77-922e-914ec3a9685c",
"shortName": "CERTVDE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2022-018/"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "VDE-2022-018",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Remote Code Execution in all versions of various RAD-ISM-900-EN-* devices by PHOENIX CONTACT",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "info@cert.vde.com",
"DATE_PUBLIC": "2022-05-11T13:00:00.000Z",
"ID": "CVE-2022-29898",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Remote Code Execution in all versions of various RAD-ISM-900-EN-* devices by PHOENIX CONTACT"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD/B",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "All Versions",
"version_value": "All Versions"
}
]
}
},
{
"product_name": "RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "All Versions",
"version_value": "All Versions"
}
]
}
},
{
"product_name": "RAD-ISM-900-EN-BD-BUS",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "All Versions",
"version_value": "All Versions"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "PHOENIX CONTACT"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The vulnerabilities were discovered and reported by Logan Carpenter of DRAGOS."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "On various RAD-ISM-900-EN-* devices by PHOENIX CONTACT an admin user could use the configuration file uploader in the WebUI to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the OS due to an improper validation of an integrity check value in all versions of the firmware."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2022-018/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://cert.vde.com/en/advisories/VDE-2022-018/"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "VDE-2022-018",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "270ccfa6-a436-4e77-922e-914ec3a9685c",
"assignerShortName": "CERTVDE",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-29898",
"datePublished": "2022-05-11T14:25:24.072Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-04-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T19:15:11.050Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-33711 (GCVE-0-2022-33711)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-07-11 13:37 – Updated: 2024-08-03 08:09
VLAI
Summary
Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung USB Driver Windows Installer for Mobile Phones prior to version 1.7.56.0 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.sms… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Mobile | Samsung USB Driver Windows Installer for Mobile Phones |
Affected:
unspecified , < 1.7.56.0
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T08:09:22.601Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year==2022\u0026month=07"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Samsung USB Driver Windows Installer for Mobile Phones",
"vendor": "Samsung Mobile",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.7.56.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung USB Driver Windows Installer for Mobile Phones prior to version 1.7.56.0 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H"
},
"type": "unknown"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-07-11T13:37:34.000Z",
"orgId": "3af57064-a867-422c-b2ad-40307b65c458",
"shortName": "Samsung Mobile"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year==2022\u0026month=07"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "mobile.security@samsung.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-33711",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Samsung USB Driver Windows Installer for Mobile Phones",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "",
"version_value": "1.7.56.0"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Samsung Mobile"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung USB Driver Windows Installer for Mobile Phones prior to version 1.7.56.0 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year==2022\u0026month=07",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year==2022\u0026month=07"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3af57064-a867-422c-b2ad-40307b65c458",
"assignerShortName": "Samsung Mobile",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-33711",
"datePublished": "2022-07-11T13:37:34.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-06-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T08:09:22.601Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-35961 (GCVE-0-2022-35961)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-08-14 00:05 – Updated: 2025-04-23 17:50
VLAI
Title
ECDSA signature malleability in OpenZeppelin Contracts
Summary
OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3.
Severity
7.9 (High)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-cont… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-cont… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-cont… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenZeppelin | openzeppelin-contracts |
Affected:
>= 4.1.0, < 4.7.3
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T09:51:59.403Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3610"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v4.7.3"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-35961",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T15:50:53.166445Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T17:50:36.577Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openzeppelin-contracts",
"vendor": "OpenZeppelin",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.1.0, \u003c 4.7.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-08-14T00:05:09.000Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3610"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v4.7.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ECDSA signature malleability in OpenZeppelin Contracts",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-35961",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "ECDSA signature malleability in OpenZeppelin Contracts"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "openzeppelin-contracts",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "\u003e= 4.1.0, \u003c 4.7.3"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "OpenZeppelin"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issue for the functions that take a single `bytes` argument, and not the functions that take `r, v, s` or `r, vs` as separate arguments. The potentially affected contracts are those that implement signature reuse or replay protection by marking the signature itself as used rather than the signed message or a nonce included in it. A user may take a signature that has already been submitted, submit it again in a different form, and bypass this protection. The issue has been patched in 4.7.3."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3610",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3610"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v4.7.3",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v4.7.3"
}
]
},
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-4h98-2769-gh6h",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-35961",
"datePublished": "2022-08-14T00:05:09.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-07-15T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T17:50:36.577Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-39844 (GCVE-0-2022-39844)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-09-09 14:39 – Updated: 2024-08-03 12:07
VLAI
Summary
Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Smart Switch PC prior to version 4.3.22083 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction.
Severity
5.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.sms… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Mobile | Smart Switch PC |
Affected:
unspecified , < 4.3.22083
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:07:42.878Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=09"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Smart Switch PC",
"vendor": "Samsung Mobile",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.3.22083",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Smart Switch PC prior to version 4.3.22083 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-09-16T16:36:37.000Z",
"orgId": "3af57064-a867-422c-b2ad-40307b65c458",
"shortName": "Samsung Mobile"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=09"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "mobile.security@samsung.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-39844",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Smart Switch PC",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "",
"version_value": "4.3.22083"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Samsung Mobile"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Smart Switch PC prior to version 4.3.22083 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=09",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=09"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3af57064-a867-422c-b2ad-40307b65c458",
"assignerShortName": "Samsung Mobile",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-39844",
"datePublished": "2022-09-09T14:39:57.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-09-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:07:42.878Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-39845 (GCVE-0-2022-39845)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-09-09 14:39 – Updated: 2024-08-03 12:07
VLAI
Summary
Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung Kies prior to version 2.6.4.22074 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction.
Severity
5.5 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.sms… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Mobile | Samsung Kies |
Affected:
unspecified , < 2.6.4.22074
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:07:43.038Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=09"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Samsung Kies",
"vendor": "Samsung Mobile",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.6.4.22074",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung Kies prior to version 2.6.4.22074 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-09-16T16:35:37.000Z",
"orgId": "3af57064-a867-422c-b2ad-40307b65c458",
"shortName": "Samsung Mobile"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=09"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "mobile.security@samsung.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-39845",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Samsung Kies",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "",
"version_value": "2.6.4.22074"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Samsung Mobile"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Improper validation of integrity check vulnerability in Samsung Kies prior to version 2.6.4.22074 allows local attackers to delete arbitrary directory using directory junction."
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=09",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://security.samsungmobile.com/serviceWeb.smsb?year=2022\u0026month=09"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "3af57064-a867-422c-b2ad-40307b65c458",
"assignerShortName": "Samsung Mobile",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-39845",
"datePublished": "2022-09-09T14:39:57.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-09-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:07:43.038Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2022-45142 (GCVE-0-2022-45142)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-03-06 00:00 – Updated: 2025-03-06 20:20
VLAI
Summary
The fix for CVE-2022-3437 included changing memcmp to be constant time and a workaround for a compiler bug by adding "!= 0" comparisons to the result of memcmp. When these patches were backported to the heimdal-7.7.1 and heimdal-7.8.0 branches (and possibly other branches) a logic inversion sneaked in causing the validation of message integrity codes in gssapi/arcfour to be inverted.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/… | |
| https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-06 | vendor-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T14:09:56.389Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/02/08/1"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202310-06",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-06"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2022-45142",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-03-06T20:20:44.599013Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-06T20:20:48.532Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Samba",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "unknown"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The fix for CVE-2022-3437 included changing memcmp to be constant time and a workaround for a compiler bug by adding \"!= 0\" comparisons to the result of memcmp. When these patches were backported to the heimdal-7.7.1 and heimdal-7.8.0 branches (and possibly other branches) a logic inversion sneaked in causing the validation of message integrity codes in gssapi/arcfour to be inverted."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-10-08T08:06:31.799Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/02/08/1"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202310-06",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-06"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2022-45142",
"datePublished": "2023-03-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2022-11-10T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-03-06T20:20:48.532Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-28002 (GCVE-0-2023-28002)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-11-14 18:05 – Updated: 2025-06-11 14:23
VLAI
Summary
An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability [CWE-354] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and VMs may allow a local attacker with admin privileges to boot a malicious image on the device and bypass the filesystem integrity check in place.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-354 - Execute unauthorized code or commands
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet | FortiOS |
Affected:
7.2.0 , ≤ 7.2.3
(semver)
Affected: 7.0.0 , ≤ 7.0.12 (semver) Affected: 6.4.0 , ≤ 6.4.15 (semver) Affected: 6.2.0 , ≤ 6.2.16 (semver) Affected: 6.0.0 , ≤ 6.0.18 (semver) cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| Fortinet | FortiProxy |
Affected:
7.4.0 , ≤ 7.4.1
(semver)
Affected: 7.2.0 , ≤ 7.2.8 (semver) Affected: 7.0.0 , ≤ 7.0.19 (semver) Affected: 2.0.0 , ≤ 2.0.14 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T12:23:30.891Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-396",
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-396"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "fortios",
"vendor": "fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.0.17",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.2.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.4.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-28002",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-11T14:23:13.417182Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-11T14:23:35.801Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.18:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.17:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.16:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.15:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:6.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiOS",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.4.15",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.2.16",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.0.18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"cpes": [],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiProxy",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.19",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2.0.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability [CWE-354] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.12, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and VMs may allow a local attacker\u00a0with admin privileges to boot a malicious image on the device and bypass the filesystem integrity check in place."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "Execute unauthorized code or commands",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-10-18T14:54:04.182Z",
"orgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"shortName": "fortinet"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-396",
"url": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-396"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Please upgrade to FortiOS version 7.4.0 or above \nPlease upgrade to FortiOS version 7.2.4 or above \nPlease upgrade to FortiOS version 7.0.13 or above \nPlease upgrade to FortiProxy version 7.4.2 or above \nPlease upgrade to FortiProxy version 7.2.9 or above"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"assignerShortName": "fortinet",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-28002",
"datePublished": "2023-11-14T18:05:12.283Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-03-09T10:09:33.120Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-11T14:23:35.801Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2023-28386 (GCVE-0-2023-28386)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-05-22 19:35 – Updated: 2025-01-16 21:33
VLAI
Summary
Snap One OvrC Pro devices versions 7.2 and prior do not validate firmware updates correctly. The device only calculates the MD5 hash of the firmware and does not check using a private-public key mechanism. The lack of complete PKI system firmware signature could allow attackers to upload arbitrary firmware updates, resulting in code execution.
Severity
8.6 (High)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap One | OvrC Cloud |
Affected:
0 , < 7.3
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T12:38:24.902Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-23-136-01"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.control4.com/docs/product/ovrc-software/release-notes/english/latest/ovrc-software-release-notes-rev-p.pdf"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-28386",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-01-16T20:55:33.363400Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-16T21:33:35.168Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OvrC Cloud",
"vendor": "Snap One",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Uri Katz of Claroty reported these vulnerabilities to CISA."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSnap One OvrC Pro devices versions 7.2 and prior do not validate firmware updates correctly. The device only calculates the MD5 hash of the firmware and does not check using a private-public key mechanism. The lack of complete PKI system firmware signature could allow attackers to upload arbitrary firmware updates, resulting in code execution.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Snap One OvrC Pro devices versions 7.2 and prior do not validate firmware updates correctly. The device only calculates the MD5 hash of the firmware and does not check using a private-public key mechanism. The lack of complete PKI system firmware signature could allow attackers to upload arbitrary firmware updates, resulting in code execution."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-09T17:33:01.774Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-23-136-01"
},
{
"url": "https://www.control4.com/docs/product/ovrc-software/release-notes/english/latest/ovrc-software-release-notes-rev-p.pdf"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eSnap One has released the following updates/fixes for the affected products:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eOvrC Pro v7.2 has been automatically pushed out to devices to update via OvrC cloud.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eOvrC Pro v7.3 has been automatically pushed out to devices to update via OvrC cloud.\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eDisable UPnP.\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor more information, see Snap One\u2019s \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.control4.com/docs/product/ovrc-software/release-notes/english/latest/ovrc-software-release-notes-rev-p.pdf\"\u003eRelease Notes\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Snap One has released the following updates/fixes for the affected products:\n\n * OvrC Pro v7.2 has been automatically pushed out to devices to update via OvrC cloud.\n * OvrC Pro v7.3 has been automatically pushed out to devices to update via OvrC cloud.\n * Disable UPnP.\n\n\nFor more information, see Snap One\u2019s Release Notes https://www.control4.com/docs/product/ovrc-software/release-notes/english/latest/ovrc-software-release-notes-rev-p.pdf ."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-28386",
"datePublished": "2023-05-22T19:35:12.357Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-04-26T19:18:23.295Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-01-16T21:33:35.168Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that the checksums present in messages are properly checked in accordance with the protocol specification before they are parsed and used.
CAPEC-145: Checksum Spoofing
An adversary spoofs a checksum message for the purpose of making a payload appear to have a valid corresponding checksum. Checksums are used to verify message integrity. They consist of some value based on the value of the message they are protecting. Hash codes are a common checksum mechanism. Both the sender and recipient are able to compute the checksum based on the contents of the message. If the message contents change between the sender and recipient, the sender and recipient will compute different checksum values. Since the sender's checksum value is transmitted with the message, the recipient would know that a modification occurred. In checksum spoofing an adversary modifies the message body and then modifies the corresponding checksum so that the recipient's checksum calculation will match the checksum (created by the adversary) in the message. This would prevent the recipient from realizing that a change occurred.
CAPEC-463: Padding Oracle Crypto Attack
An adversary is able to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key if a target system leaks data on whether or not a padding error happened while decrypting the ciphertext. A target system that leaks this type of information becomes the padding oracle and an adversary is able to make use of that oracle to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key by issuing on average 128*b calls to the padding oracle (where b is the number of bytes in the ciphertext block). In addition to performing decryption, an adversary is also able to produce valid ciphertexts (i.e., perform encryption) by using the padding oracle, all without knowing the encryption key.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.