CWE-354
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
The product does not validate or incorrectly validates the integrity check values or "checksums" of a message. This may prevent it from detecting if the data has been modified or corrupted in transmission.
CVE-2024-7402 (GCVE-0-2024-7402)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-14 04:32 – Updated: 2025-08-15 12:58
VLAI
Title
Netskope Client Configuration Tampering with Local MITM
Summary
Netskope has identified a potential gap in its agent (Netskope Client) in which a malicious insider can potentially tamper the Netskope Client configuration by performing MITM (Man-in-the-Middle) activity on the Netskope Client communication channel. A successful exploitation would require administrative privileges on the machine, and could result in temporarily altering the configuration of Netskope Client or permanently disabling or removing the agent from the machine.
Severity
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netskope | Netskope Client |
Affected:
0 , < 123.0.16, 126.0.9, 129.0.0
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-7402",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-15T12:28:14.675484Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-15T12:58:40.808Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Netskope Client",
"vendor": "Netskope",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "123.0.16, 126.0.9, 129.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Sander de Wit"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Netskope has identified a potential gap in its agent (Netskope Client) in which a malicious insider can potentially tamper the Netskope Client configuration by performing MITM (Man-in-the-Middle) activity on the Netskope Client communication channel. A successful exploitation would require administrative privileges on the machine, and could result in temporarily altering the configuration of Netskope Client or permanently disabling or removing the agent from the machine. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Netskope has identified a potential gap in its agent (Netskope Client) in which a malicious insider can potentially tamper the Netskope Client configuration by performing MITM (Man-in-the-Middle) activity on the Netskope Client communication channel. A successful exploitation would require administrative privileges on the machine, and could result in temporarily altering the configuration of Netskope Client or permanently disabling or removing the agent from the machine."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-14T04:32:41.870Z",
"orgId": "bf992f6a-e49d-4e94-9479-c4cff32c62bc",
"shortName": "Netskope"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.netskope.com/company/security-compliance-and-assurance/security-advisories-and-disclosures/netskope-security-advisory-nskpsa-2024-002"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Customers can apply the fix by enabling the \u201cSecure Configuration\u201d option from the tenant under Settings -\u0026gt; Security Cloud Platform -\u0026gt; Netskope Client -\u0026gt; MDM Distribution -\u0026gt; Secure Enrollment page. Customers are recommended to upgrade the Netskope Client to the latest versions of R123, R126, R129 or higher and adopt \u201cNetskope Client Secure Configuration Service\u201d for APIs."
}
],
"value": "Customers can apply the fix by enabling the \u201cSecure Configuration\u201d option from the tenant under Settings -\u003e Security Cloud Platform -\u003e Netskope Client -\u003e MDM Distribution -\u003e Secure Enrollment page. Customers are recommended to upgrade the Netskope Client to the latest versions of R123, R126, R129 or higher and adopt \u201cNetskope Client Secure Configuration Service\u201d for APIs."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "NSKPSA-2024-002",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Netskope Client Configuration Tampering with Local MITM",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Prevent users from installing or adding 3rd party certificates in their machine\u0027s Operating System trust store. This will prevent users from performing MITM and tampering with configurations."
}
],
"value": "Prevent users from installing or adding 3rd party certificates in their machine\u0027s Operating System trust store. This will prevent users from performing MITM and tampering with configurations."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "bf992f6a-e49d-4e94-9479-c4cff32c62bc",
"assignerShortName": "Netskope",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-7402",
"datePublished": "2025-08-14T04:32:41.870Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-08-02T07:21:12.054Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-15T12:58:40.808Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-11543 (GCVE-0-2025-11543)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-22 05:09 – Updated: 2025-12-22 14:33 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
Summary
Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Sharp Display Solutions projectors allows a attacker may create and run unauthorized firmware.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-11543",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-22T14:33:50.755374Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-22T14:33:56.512Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "NP-P502HL-2, NP-P502WL-2, NP-P502HLG-2, NP-P502WLG, NP-P502H, NP-P502W, NP-P452H, NP-P452W, NP-P502HG, NP-P502WG, NP-P452HG, NP-P452WG, NP-P502H+, NP-P502W+, NP-CR5450H, NP-CR5450W, NP-P502HL, NP-P502WL, NP-P502HLG, NP-P502WLG, NP-P502HL+, NP-P502WL+, NP-CR5450HL, NP-CR5450WL, NP-UM352W, NP-UM352WG, NP-UM352W+",
"vendor": "Sharp Display Solutions, Ltd.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
"value": "Sebastian Pahl of University Luxembourg"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Sharp Display Solutions projectors allows a attacker may create and run unauthorized firmware."
}
],
"value": "Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Sharp Display Solutions projectors allows a attacker may create and run unauthorized firmware."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.5,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-22T05:09:48.892Z",
"orgId": "f2760a35-e0d8-4637-ac4c-cc1a2de3e282",
"shortName": "NEC"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://sharp-displays.jp.sharp/global/support/info/PJ-CVE-2025-11540.html"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f2760a35-e0d8-4637-ac4c-cc1a2de3e282",
"assignerShortName": "NEC",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-11543",
"datePublished": "2025-12-22T05:09:48.892Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-09T06:46:42.281Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-22T14:33:56.512Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-25183 (GCVE-0-2025-25183)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-07 19:59 – Updated: 2025-02-12 20:51
VLAI
Title
vLLM using built-in hash() from Python 3.12 leads to predictable hash collisions in vLLM prefix cache
Summary
vLLM is a high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs. Maliciously constructed statements can lead to hash collisions, resulting in cache reuse, which can interfere with subsequent responses and cause unintended behavior. Prefix caching makes use of Python's built-in hash() function. As of Python 3.12, the behavior of hash(None) has changed to be a predictable constant value. This makes it more feasible that someone could try exploit hash collisions. The impact of a collision would be using cache that was generated using different content. Given knowledge of prompts in use and predictable hashing behavior, someone could intentionally populate the cache using a prompt known to collide with another prompt in use. This issue has been addressed in version 0.7.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12621 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/432117cd… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| vllm-project | vllm |
Affected:
< 0.7.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-25183",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-02-07T20:33:57.205558Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:51:46.402Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "vllm",
"vendor": "vllm-project",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.7.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "vLLM is a high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs. Maliciously constructed statements can lead to hash collisions, resulting in cache reuse, which can interfere with subsequent responses and cause unintended behavior. Prefix caching makes use of Python\u0027s built-in hash() function. As of Python 3.12, the behavior of hash(None) has changed to be a predictable constant value. This makes it more feasible that someone could try exploit hash collisions. The impact of a collision would be using cache that was generated using different content. Given knowledge of prompts in use and predictable hashing behavior, someone could intentionally populate the cache using a prompt known to collide with another prompt in use. This issue has been addressed in version 0.7.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.6,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-07T19:59:01.370Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-rm76-4mrf-v9r8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-rm76-4mrf-v9r8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12621",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/12621"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/432117cd1f59c76d97da2eaff55a7d758301dbc7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/432117cd1f59c76d97da2eaff55a7d758301dbc7"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-rm76-4mrf-v9r8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "vLLM using built-in hash() from Python 3.12 leads to predictable hash collisions in vLLM prefix cache"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-25183",
"datePublished": "2025-02-07T19:59:01.370Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-02-03T19:30:53.399Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-02-12T20:51:46.402Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-3247 (GCVE-0-2025-3247)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-16 05:23 – Updated: 2026-04-08 16:46
VLAI
Title
Contact Form 7 <= 6.0.5 - Order Replay Vulnerability
Summary
The Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Order Replay in all versions up to, and including, 6.0.5 via the 'wpcf7_stripe_skip_spam_check' function due to insufficient validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single Stripe PaymentIntent for multiple transactions. Only the first transaction is processed via Stripe, but the plugin sends a successful email message for each transaction, which may trick an administrator into fulfilling each order.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rocklobsterinc | Contact Form 7 |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 6.0.5
(semver)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-3247",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-16T13:23:21.654939Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-16T13:23:45.320Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Contact Form 7",
"vendor": "rocklobsterinc",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.0.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Asaf Mozes"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Order Replay in all versions up to, and including, 6.0.5 via the \u0027wpcf7_stripe_skip_spam_check\u0027 function due to insufficient validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single Stripe PaymentIntent for multiple transactions. Only the first transaction is processed via Stripe, but the plugin sends a successful email message for each transaction, which may trick an administrator into fulfilling each order."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T16:46:27.696Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/38257dbf-288e-4028-af65-85f5389888ac?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/contact-form-7/tags/6.0.5/modules/stripe/stripe.php#L114"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3270138/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-15T16:56:22.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Contact Form 7 \u003c= 6.0.5 - Order Replay Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-3247",
"datePublished": "2025-04-16T05:23:00.706Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-04T00:06:57.248Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T16:46:27.696Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-33193 (GCVE-0-2025-33193)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-25 17:59 – Updated: 2025-11-25 20:29
VLAI
Summary
NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in SROOT firmware, where an attacker could cause improper validation of integrity. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure.
Severity
5.7 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-33193",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T20:29:10.239982Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T20:29:19.276Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"NVIDIA DGX OS"
],
"product": "DGX Spark",
"vendor": "NVIDIA",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All versions prior to OTA0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": true,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in SROOT firmware, where an attacker could cause improper validation of integrity. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure."
}
],
"value": "NVIDIA DGX Spark GB10 contains a vulnerability in SROOT firmware, where an attacker could cause improper validation of integrity. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Code Execution, Denial of Service, Information Disclosure"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T17:59:10.971Z",
"orgId": "9576f279-3576-44b5-a4af-b9a8644b2de6",
"shortName": "nvidia"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-33193"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-33193"
},
{
"url": "https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5720"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "NVIDIA PSIRT"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9576f279-3576-44b5-a4af-b9a8644b2de6",
"assignerShortName": "nvidia",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-33193",
"datePublished": "2025-11-25T17:59:10.971Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-15T18:51:03.729Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T20:29:19.276Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-3479 (GCVE-0-2025-3479)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-04-17 11:13 – Updated: 2026-04-08 17:21
VLAI
Title
Forminator <= 1.42.0 - Order Replay Vulnerability
Summary
The Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Order Replay in all versions up to, and including, 1.42.0 via the 'handle_stripe_single' function due to insufficient validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single Stripe PaymentIntent for multiple transactions. Only the first transaction is processed via Stripe, but the plugin sends a successful email message for each transaction, which may trick an administrator into fulfilling each order.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| wpmudev | Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.42.0
(semver)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-3479",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-04-17T13:29:08.657207Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-17T13:39:51.779Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Forminator Forms \u2013 Contact Form, Payment Form \u0026 Custom Form Builder",
"vendor": "wpmudev",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.42.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Asaf Mozes"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Forminator Forms \u2013 Contact Form, Payment Form \u0026 Custom Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Order Replay in all versions up to, and including, 1.42.0 via the \u0027handle_stripe_single\u0027 function due to insufficient validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reuse a single Stripe PaymentIntent for multiple transactions. Only the first transaction is processed via Stripe, but the plugin sends a successful email message for each transaction, which may trick an administrator into fulfilling each order."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:21:34.121Z",
"orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"shortName": "Wordfence"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/c873c04e-516e-41ee-a295-b8c5235abc1b?source=cve"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/forminator/tags/1.41.2/library/modules/custom-forms/front/front-action.php#L964"
},
{
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3274844/"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-04-16T22:33:04.000Z",
"value": "Disclosed"
}
],
"title": "Forminator \u003c= 1.42.0 - Order Replay Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
"assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-3479",
"datePublished": "2025-04-17T11:13:06.397Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-09T19:48:06.225Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T17:21:34.121Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-39203 (GCVE-0-2025-39203)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-24 11:57 – Updated: 2025-10-07 10:00
VLAI
Summary
A vulnerability exists in the IEC 61850 of the MicroSCADA X SYS600 product. An IEC 61850-8 crafted message content from IED or remote system can cause a denial of service resulting in disconnection loop.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitachi Energy | MicroSCADA X SYS600 |
Affected:
10.5 , ≤ 10.6
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-39203",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-24T15:22:09.329141Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-25T12:42:19.734Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MicroSCADA X SYS600",
"vendor": "Hitachi Energy",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "10.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "10.5",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A vulnerability exists in the IEC 61850 of the MicroSCADA X SYS600 product. An IEC 61850-8 crafted message content from IED or remote system can cause a denial of service resulting in disconnection loop."
}
],
"value": "A vulnerability exists in the IEC 61850 of the MicroSCADA X SYS600 product. An IEC 61850-8 crafted message content from IED or remote system can cause a denial of service resulting in disconnection loop."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-595",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-595 Connection Reset"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T10:00:29.745Z",
"orgId": "e383dce4-0c27-4495-91c4-0db157728d17",
"shortName": "Hitachi Energy"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://publisher.hitachienergy.com/preview?DocumentID=8DBD000218\u0026LanguageCode=en\u0026DocumentPartId=\u0026Action=Launch"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e383dce4-0c27-4495-91c4-0db157728d17",
"assignerShortName": "Hitachi Energy",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-39203",
"datePublished": "2025-06-24T11:57:04.229Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-16T05:26:03.424Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T10:00:29.745Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-4418 (GCVE-0-2025-4418)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-12 19:37 – Updated: 2025-06-12 19:54
VLAI
Title
AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Summary
An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability exists in
AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploited,
could allow a miscreant with elevated privileges to modify PI Connector
for CygNet local data files (cache and buffers) in a way that causes the
connector service to become unresponsive.
Severity
4.4 (Medium)
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVEVA | PI Connector for CygNet |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.6.14
(custom)
|
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-4418",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-12T19:53:58.062161Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T19:54:54.525Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "PI Connector for CygNet",
"vendor": "AVEVA",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.6.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "AVEVA reported these vulnerabilities to CISA."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability exists in \n\nAVEVA\u0026nbsp;PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploited, \ncould allow a miscreant with elevated privileges to modify PI Connector \nfor CygNet local data files (cache and buffers) in a way that causes the\n connector service to become unresponsive."
}
],
"value": "An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability exists in \n\nAVEVA\u00a0PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploited, \ncould allow a miscreant with elevated privileges to modify PI Connector \nfor CygNet local data files (cache and buffers) in a way that causes the\n connector service to become unresponsive."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 4.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T19:37:46.740Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-162-09"
},
{
"url": "https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAVEVA recommends that organizations evaluate the impact of these \nvulnerabilities based on their operational environment, architecture, \nand product implementation. Users of affected product versions should \napply security updates to mitigate the risk of exploit.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll affected versions of PI Connector for CygNet can be fixed by upgrading to PI Connector for CygNet v1.7.0 or higher. From \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://my.osisoft.com/\"\u003eOSISoft Customer Portal\u003c/a\u003e, search for \"PI Connector for CygNet\" and select Version 1.7.0 or higher.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\nFor additional information please refer to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/\"\u003eAVEVA-2025-002\u003c/a\u003e.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "AVEVA recommends that organizations evaluate the impact of these \nvulnerabilities based on their operational environment, architecture, \nand product implementation. Users of affected product versions should \napply security updates to mitigate the risk of exploit.\n\nAll affected versions of PI Connector for CygNet can be fixed by upgrading to PI Connector for CygNet v1.7.0 or higher. From OSISoft Customer Portal https://my.osisoft.com/ , search for \"PI Connector for CygNet\" and select Version 1.7.0 or higher.\n\n\n\n\n\nFor additional information please refer to AVEVA-2025-002 https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/ ."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-25-162-09",
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAVEVA further recommends users follow general defensive measures:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEnsure that PI Connector for CygNet administrative access is only provided to trusted entities.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAudit custom installation folder Access Control Lists (ACLs) to ensure access is only provided to trusted entities.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAudit and limit membership to the OS Local \"Administrators\" and \"PI Connector Administrators\" groups.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor additional information please refer to \u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/\"\u003eAVEVA-2025-002\u003c/a\u003e\u003c/p\u003e.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "AVEVA further recommends users follow general defensive measures:\n\n\n\n * Ensure that PI Connector for CygNet administrative access is only provided to trusted entities.\n\n * Audit custom installation folder Access Control Lists (ACLs) to ensure access is only provided to trusted entities.\n\n * Audit and limit membership to the OS Local \"Administrators\" and \"PI Connector Administrators\" groups.\n\n\n\n\nFor additional information please refer to AVEVA-2025-002 https://www.aveva.com/en/support-and-success/cyber-security-updates/ \n\n."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-4418",
"datePublished": "2025-06-12T19:37:46.740Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-07T18:16:55.551Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-12T19:54:54.525Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-4616 (GCVE-0-2025-4616)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-14 17:33 – Updated: 2025-11-17 20:39
VLAI
Title
Prisma Browser: Insufficient Validation of Untrusted Input Vulnerability in Prisma Browser
Summary
An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma® Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser’s security controls.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2025-4616 | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | Prisma Browser |
Affected:
142.15.6.0 , ≤ 142.15.6.60
(custom)
|
Date Public
2025-11-12 17:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-4616",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-17T20:39:14.854172Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T20:39:22.564Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Prisma Browser",
"vendor": "Palo Alto Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "142.15.6.60",
"status": "affected",
"version": "142.15.6.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "No special configuration is required to be affected by this issue."
}
],
"value": "No special configuration is required to be affected by this issue."
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Palo Alto Networks thanks Tan Inn Fung, Yu Ann Ong, Zhang Bosen from the GovTech Cybersecurity Group for discovering and reporting this issue."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-11-12T17:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma\u00ae Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser\u2019s security controls."
}
],
"value": "An insufficient validation of an untrusted input vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Prisma\u00ae Browser allows a locally authenticated non-admin user to revert the browser\u2019s security controls."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Palo Alto Networks is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this issue."
}
],
"value": "Palo Alto Networks is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this issue."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-475",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-475 Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NO",
"Recovery": "USER",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 1.1,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"exploitMaturity": "UNREPORTED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "AMBER",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "DIFFUSE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:M/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "MODERATE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-14T18:43:08.447Z",
"orgId": "d6c1279f-00f6-4ef7-9217-f89ffe703ec0",
"shortName": "palo_alto"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/CVE-2025-4616"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003ctable class=\"tbl\"\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth\u003eVersion\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth\u003eMinor Version\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth\u003eSuggested Solution\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003ePrisma Browser\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eUpgrade to\u0026nbsp;142.15.6.60 \u0026nbsp;or later.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/table\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Version\nMinor Version\nSuggested Solution\nPrisma BrowserUpgrade to\u00a0142.15.6.60 \u00a0or later."
}
],
"source": {
"defect": [
"TW-29034"
],
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-12T17:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial Publication"
}
],
"title": "Prisma Browser: Insufficient Validation of Untrusted Input Vulnerability in Prisma Browser",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "No workaround or mitigation is available."
}
],
"value": "No workaround or mitigation is available."
}
],
"x_affectedList": [
"Prisma Browser 140.26.0",
"Prisma Browser 140.26.1",
"Prisma Browser 140.26.2",
"Prisma Browser 140.26.3"
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "d6c1279f-00f6-4ef7-9217-f89ffe703ec0",
"assignerShortName": "palo_alto",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-4616",
"datePublished": "2025-11-14T17:33:21.420Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-05-12T22:05:14.544Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T20:39:22.564Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-54887 (GCVE-0-2025-54887)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-08 00:06 – Updated: 2025-08-08 16:43
VLAI
Title
jwe: Missing AES-GCM authentication tag validation in encrypted JWEs
Summary
jwe is a Ruby implementation of the RFC 7516 JSON Web Encryption (JWE) standard. In versions 1.1.0 and below, authentication tags of encrypted JWEs can be brute forced, which may result in loss of confidentiality for those JWEs and provide ways to craft arbitrary JWEs. This puts users at risk because JWEs can be modified to decrypt to an arbitrary value, decrypted by observing parsing differences and the GCM internal GHASH key can be recovered. Users are affected by this vulnerability even if they do not use an AES-GCM encryption algorithm for their JWEs. As the GHASH key may have been leaked, users must rotate the encryption keys after upgrading. This issue is fixed in version 1.1.1.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/jwt/ruby-jwe/security/advisori… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/jwt/ruby-jwe/commit/1e719d79ba… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-54887",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-08T16:42:02.546523Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-08T16:43:15.548Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ruby-jwe",
"vendor": "jwt",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.1.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "jwe is a Ruby implementation of the RFC 7516 JSON Web Encryption (JWE) standard. In versions 1.1.0 and below, authentication tags of encrypted JWEs can be brute forced, which may result in loss of confidentiality for those JWEs and provide ways to craft arbitrary JWEs. This puts users at risk because JWEs can be modified to decrypt to an arbitrary value, decrypted by observing parsing differences and the GCM internal GHASH key can be recovered. Users are affected by this vulnerability even if they do not use an AES-GCM encryption algorithm for their JWEs. As the GHASH key may have been leaked, users must rotate the encryption keys after upgrading. This issue is fixed in version 1.1.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-08T00:06:20.021Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/jwt/ruby-jwe/security/advisories/GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/jwt/ruby-jwe/security/advisories/GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/jwt/ruby-jwe/commit/1e719d79ba3d7aadaa39a2f08c25df077a0f9ff1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/jwt/ruby-jwe/commit/1e719d79ba3d7aadaa39a2f08c25df077a0f9ff1"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-c7p4-hx26-pr73",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "jwe: Missing AES-GCM authentication tag validation in encrypted JWEs"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-54887",
"datePublished": "2025-08-08T00:06:20.021Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-07-31T17:23:33.476Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-08T16:43:15.548Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that the checksums present in messages are properly checked in accordance with the protocol specification before they are parsed and used.
CAPEC-145: Checksum Spoofing
An adversary spoofs a checksum message for the purpose of making a payload appear to have a valid corresponding checksum. Checksums are used to verify message integrity. They consist of some value based on the value of the message they are protecting. Hash codes are a common checksum mechanism. Both the sender and recipient are able to compute the checksum based on the contents of the message. If the message contents change between the sender and recipient, the sender and recipient will compute different checksum values. Since the sender's checksum value is transmitted with the message, the recipient would know that a modification occurred. In checksum spoofing an adversary modifies the message body and then modifies the corresponding checksum so that the recipient's checksum calculation will match the checksum (created by the adversary) in the message. This would prevent the recipient from realizing that a change occurred.
CAPEC-463: Padding Oracle Crypto Attack
An adversary is able to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key if a target system leaks data on whether or not a padding error happened while decrypting the ciphertext. A target system that leaks this type of information becomes the padding oracle and an adversary is able to make use of that oracle to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key by issuing on average 128*b calls to the padding oracle (where b is the number of bytes in the ciphertext block). In addition to performing decryption, an adversary is also able to produce valid ciphertexts (i.e., perform encryption) by using the padding oracle, all without knowing the encryption key.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.