CWE-770
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
CVE-2026-32066 (GCVE-0-2026-32066)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-23 21:36 – Updated: 2026-03-23 22:08
VLAI
This CVE ID has been rejected.
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-23T22:08:19.720Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "This CVE ID has been rejected."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32066",
"datePublished": "2026-03-23T21:36:06.374Z",
"dateRejected": "2026-03-23T22:08:19.720Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-10T19:52:11.869Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-23T22:08:19.720Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-32145 (GCVE-0-2026-32145)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-02 10:30 – Updated: 2026-04-07 04:07
VLAI
Title
Multipart form body parser bypasses body size limits in wisp
Summary
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in gleam-wisp wisp allows a denial of service via multipart form body parsing.
The multipart_body function bypasses configured max_body_size and max_files_size limits. When a multipart boundary is not present in a chunk, the parser takes the MoreRequiredForBody path, which appends the chunk to the output but passes the quota unchanged to the recursive call. Only the final chunk containing the boundary is counted via decrement_quota. The same pattern exists in multipart_headers, where MoreRequiredForHeaders recurses without calling decrement_body_quota.
An unauthenticated attacker can exhaust server memory or disk by sending arbitrarily large multipart form submissions in a single HTTP request.
This issue affects wisp: from 0.2.0 before 2.2.2.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/gleam-wisp/wisp/security/advis… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32145.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32145 | related |
| https://github.com/gleam-wisp/wisp/commit/7a97874… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gleam-wisp | wisp |
Affected:
0.2.0 , < 2.2.2
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:gleam-wisp:wisp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| gleam-wisp | wisp |
Affected:
d8e722e22ccb42bda9d0b6248658d37ab4e9b376 , < 7a978748e12ab29db232c222254465890e1a4a90
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:gleam-wisp:wisp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32145",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-02T13:29:06.824466Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-06T19:47:22.060Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gleam-wisp:wisp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"wisp"
],
"packageName": "wisp",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/wisp",
"product": "wisp",
"programFiles": [
"src/wisp.gleam"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "wisp:multipart_body/7"
},
{
"name": "wisp:multipart_headers/5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/gleam-wisp/wisp",
"vendor": "gleam-wisp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.2.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:gleam-wisp:wisp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"wisp"
],
"packageName": "gleam-wisp/wisp",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/gleam-wisp/wisp",
"product": "wisp",
"programFiles": [
"src/wisp.gleam"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "wisp:multipart_body/7"
},
{
"name": "wisp:multipart_headers/5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/gleam-wisp/wisp.git",
"vendor": "gleam-wisp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "7a978748e12ab29db232c222254465890e1a4a90",
"status": "affected",
"version": "d8e722e22ccb42bda9d0b6248658d37ab4e9b376",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:gleam-wisp:wisp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.2.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.2.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "John Downey"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Louis Pilfold"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in gleam-wisp wisp allows a denial of service via multipart form body parsing.\u003cp\u003eThe \u003ctt\u003emultipart_body\u003c/tt\u003e function bypasses configured \u003ctt\u003emax_body_size\u003c/tt\u003e and \u003ctt\u003emax_files_size\u003c/tt\u003e limits. When a multipart boundary is not present in a chunk, the parser takes the \u003ctt\u003eMoreRequiredForBody\u003c/tt\u003e path, which appends the chunk to the output but passes the quota unchanged to the recursive call. Only the final chunk containing the boundary is counted via \u003ctt\u003edecrement_quota\u003c/tt\u003e. The same pattern exists in \u003ctt\u003emultipart_headers\u003c/tt\u003e, where \u003ctt\u003eMoreRequiredForHeaders\u003c/tt\u003e recurses without calling \u003ctt\u003edecrement_body_quota\u003c/tt\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn unauthenticated attacker can exhaust server memory or disk by sending arbitrarily large multipart form submissions in a single HTTP request.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects wisp: from 0.2.0 before 2.2.2.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in gleam-wisp wisp allows a denial of service via multipart form body parsing.\n\nThe multipart_body function bypasses configured max_body_size and max_files_size limits. When a multipart boundary is not present in a chunk, the parser takes the MoreRequiredForBody path, which appends the chunk to the output but passes the quota unchanged to the recursive call. Only the final chunk containing the boundary is counted via decrement_quota. The same pattern exists in multipart_headers, where MoreRequiredForHeaders recurses without calling decrement_body_quota.\n\nAn unauthenticated attacker can exhaust server memory or disk by sending arbitrarily large multipart form submissions in a single HTTP request.\n\nThis issue affects wisp: from 0.2.0 before 2.2.2."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-130",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-130 Excessive Allocation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T04:07:10.339Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gleam-wisp/wisp/security/advisories/GHSA-8645-p2v4-73r2"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32145.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32145"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/gleam-wisp/wisp/commit/7a978748e12ab29db232c222254465890e1a4a90"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Multipart form body parser bypasses body size limits in wisp",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Deploy a reverse proxy (such as nginx or HAProxy) in front of the wisp application and configure it to enforce request body size limits."
}
],
"value": "Deploy a reverse proxy (such as nginx or HAProxy) in front of the wisp application and configure it to enforce request body size limits."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32145",
"datePublished": "2026-04-02T10:30:47.485Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-10T22:37:29.212Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T04:07:10.339Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-3260 (GCVE-0-2026-3260)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-24 04:11 – Updated: 2026-04-08 19:34
VLAI
Title
Undertow: undertow: denial of service due to premature multipart/form-data parsing in get requests
Summary
A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an HTTP GET request containing multipart/form-data content. If the underlying application processes parameters using methods like `getParameterMap()`, the server prematurely parses and stores this content to disk. This could lead to resource exhaustion, potentially resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
Severity
5.9 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3260 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443010 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
17 products
Date Public
2026-03-24 04:05
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-3260",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-26T12:31:14.446866Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-26T12:31:31.900Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:camel_spring_boot:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "moditect",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "pki-core:10.6/resteasy",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "pki-deps:10.6/resteasy",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "resteasy",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "org.jberet-jberet-parent",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "org.jboss.eap-jboss-eap-xp",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jbosseapxp"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "org.jberet-jberet-parent",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jbosseapxp"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "org.jboss.eap-jboss-eap-xp",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/jbossnetwork/restricted/listSoftware.html",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jbosseapxp"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "undertow-core",
"product": "Red Hat Single Sign-On 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-24T04:05:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an HTTP GET request containing multipart/form-data content. If the underlying application processes parameters using methods like `getParameterMap()`, the server prematurely parses and stores this content to disk. This could lead to resource exhaustion, potentially resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T19:34:26.182Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3260"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2443010",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443010"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-26T14:20:28.168Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-24T04:05:00.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "Undertow: undertow: denial of service due to premature multipart/form-data parsing in get requests",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
},
"x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-3260",
"datePublished": "2026-03-24T04:11:16.085Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-26T14:22:15.920Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T19:34:26.182Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-32688 (GCVE-0-2026-32688)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-27 13:45 – Updated: 2026-04-29 17:08
VLAI
Title
Atom table exhaustion via HTTP/2 :scheme pseudo-header in plug_cowboy
Summary
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-plug plug_cowboy allows unauthenticated remote denial of service via atom table exhaustion.
Plug.Cowboy.Conn.conn/1 in lib/plug/cowboy/conn.ex calls String.to_atom/1 on the value returned by :cowboy_req.scheme/1. For HTTP/2 connections, cowlib passes the client-supplied :scheme pseudo-header value through verbatim without validation. Each unique value permanently allocates a new entry in the BEAM atom table. Since atoms are never garbage-collected and the atom table has a fixed limit (default 1,048,576), an unauthenticated attacker can exhaust the table by sending HTTP/2 requests with unique :scheme values, causing the Erlang VM to abort with system_limit and taking down the entire node.
This vulnerability does not affect HTTP/1.1, where cowboy derives the scheme from the listener type rather than from a client-supplied header.
This issue affects plug_cowboy: from 2.0.0 before 2.8.1.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/elixir-plug/plug_cowboy/securi… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32688.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32688 | related |
| https://github.com/elixir-plug/plug_cowboy/commit… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| elixir-plug | plug_cowboy |
Affected:
2.0.0 , < 2.8.1
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:elixir-plug:plug_cowboy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| elixir-plug | plug_cowboy |
Affected:
12ecfd024bb179d48b018fecf074e43fe6a19c83 , < bfb34cb45eb354e56437f7023fb306de1bf9c19b
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:elixir-plug:plug_cowboy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32688",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T19:04:33.154446Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T20:11:22.651Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-plug:plug_cowboy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Plug.Cowboy.Conn\u0027"
],
"packageName": "plug_cowboy",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/plug_cowboy",
"product": "plug_cowboy",
"programFiles": [
"lib/plug/cowboy/conn.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Plug.Cowboy.Conn\u0027:conn/1"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/elixir-plug/plug_cowboy",
"vendor": "elixir-plug",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.8.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-plug:plug_cowboy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Plug.Cowboy.Conn\u0027"
],
"packageName": "elixir-plug/plug_cowboy",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/elixir-plug/plug_cowboy",
"product": "plug_cowboy",
"programFiles": [
"lib/plug/cowboy/conn.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Plug.Cowboy.Conn\u0027:conn/1"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/elixir-plug/plug_cowboy",
"vendor": "elixir-plug",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "bfb34cb45eb354e56437f7023fb306de1bf9c19b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "12ecfd024bb179d48b018fecf074e43fe6a19c83",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:elixir-plug:plug_cowboy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.8.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-plug plug_cowboy allows unauthenticated remote denial of service via atom table exhaustion.\u003cp\u003e\u003ctt\u003ePlug.Cowboy.Conn.conn/1\u003c/tt\u003e in \u003ctt\u003elib/plug/cowboy/conn.ex\u003c/tt\u003e calls \u003ctt\u003eString.to_atom/1\u003c/tt\u003e on the value returned by \u003ctt\u003e:cowboy_req.scheme/1\u003c/tt\u003e. For HTTP/2 connections, cowlib passes the client-supplied \u003ctt\u003e:scheme\u003c/tt\u003e pseudo-header value through verbatim without validation. Each unique value permanently allocates a new entry in the BEAM atom table. Since atoms are never garbage-collected and the atom table has a fixed limit (default 1,048,576), an unauthenticated attacker can exhaust the table by sending HTTP/2 requests with unique \u003ctt\u003e:scheme\u003c/tt\u003e values, causing the Erlang VM to abort with \u003ctt\u003esystem_limit\u003c/tt\u003e and taking down the entire node.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis vulnerability does not affect HTTP/1.1, where cowboy derives the scheme from the listener type rather than from a client-supplied header.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects plug_cowboy: from 2.0.0 before 2.8.1.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-plug plug_cowboy allows unauthenticated remote denial of service via atom table exhaustion.\n\nPlug.Cowboy.Conn.conn/1 in lib/plug/cowboy/conn.ex calls String.to_atom/1 on the value returned by :cowboy_req.scheme/1. For HTTP/2 connections, cowlib passes the client-supplied :scheme pseudo-header value through verbatim without validation. Each unique value permanently allocates a new entry in the BEAM atom table. Since atoms are never garbage-collected and the atom table has a fixed limit (default 1,048,576), an unauthenticated attacker can exhaust the table by sending HTTP/2 requests with unique :scheme values, causing the Erlang VM to abort with system_limit and taking down the entire node.\n\nThis vulnerability does not affect HTTP/1.1, where cowboy derives the scheme from the listener type rather than from a client-supplied header.\n\nThis issue affects plug_cowboy: from 2.0.0 before 2.8.1."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-125",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-125 Flooding"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-29T17:08:07.227Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-plug/plug_cowboy/security/advisories/GHSA-q8x4-x7mp-5vg2"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32688.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32688"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-plug/plug_cowboy/commit/bfb34cb45eb354e56437f7023fb306de1bf9c19b"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Atom table exhaustion via HTTP/2 :scheme pseudo-header in plug_cowboy",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Disable HTTP/2 on the \u003ctt\u003ePlug.Cowboy.https/3\u003c/tt\u003e listener by passing \u003ctt\u003eprotocol_options: %{protocols: [:http]}\u003c/tt\u003e in the cowboy options. This restricts the listener to HTTP/1.1, where the scheme is derived from the listener type and is not attacker-controlled."
}
],
"value": "Disable HTTP/2 on the Plug.Cowboy.https/3 listener by passing protocol_options: %{protocols: [:http]} in the cowboy options. This restricts the listener to HTTP/1.1, where the scheme is derived from the listener type and is not attacker-controlled."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32688",
"datePublished": "2026-04-27T13:45:35.160Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-13T09:12:14.475Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-29T17:08:07.227Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-32689 (GCVE-0-2026-32689)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-05 15:17 – Updated: 2026-05-07 04:25
VLAI
Title
Long-poll NDJSON body splitting causes unbounded memory allocation in Phoenix
Summary
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in phoenixframework phoenix allows a denial of service via the long-poll transport's NDJSON body handling.
In 'Elixir.Phoenix.Transports.LongPoll':publish/4, when a POST request is received with Content-Type: application/x-ndjson, the request body is split on newline characters using String.split/2 with no limit on the number of resulting segments. An attacker can send a body consisting entirely of newline bytes, causing a 1:1 amplification into a list of empty binaries — a 1 MB body produces approximately one million list elements, an 8 MB body approximately 8.4 million. Each element is then walked by Enum.map, materializing another list of the same size. This exhausts BEAM memory and schedulers, crashing the node and terminating all active sessions.
A session token required to reach the vulnerable endpoint is freely obtainable by any client via an unauthenticated GET request to the same URL with a matching Origin header, making this attack effectively unauthenticated.
This issue affects phoenix: from 1.7.0 before 1.7.22 and 1.8.6.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/secur… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32689.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32689 | related |
| https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/commi… | patch |
| https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/commi… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| phoenixframework | phoenix |
Affected:
1.7.0 , < 1.7.22
(semver)
Affected: 1.8.0 , < 1.8.6 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:phoenixframework:phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| phoenixframework | phoenix |
Affected:
2674c6ea30634667f9b09966b90269393b445953 , < *
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:phoenixframework:phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32689",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-05T18:37:12.444769Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-06T15:25:17.607Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:phoenixframework:phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Phoenix.Transports.LongPoll\u0027"
],
"packageName": "phoenix",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/phoenix",
"product": "phoenix",
"programFiles": [
"lib/phoenix/transports/long_poll.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Phoenix.Transports.LongPoll\u0027:publish/4"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix",
"vendor": "phoenixframework",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.7.22",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.7.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "1.8.6",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.8.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:phoenixframework:phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Phoenix.Transports.LongPoll\u0027"
],
"packageName": "phoenixframework/phoenix",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/phoenixframework/phoenix",
"product": "phoenix",
"programFiles": [
"lib/phoenix/transports/long_poll.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Phoenix.Transports.LongPoll\u0027:publish/4"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix",
"vendor": "phoenixframework",
"versions": [
{
"changes": [
{
"at": "1a67c61ff9ce0a7711662ac7354861917a7c80f7",
"status": "unaffected"
},
{
"at": "912ea181fd247c21dbcc49fb97d0053b947d81bf",
"status": "unaffected"
}
],
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2674c6ea30634667f9b09966b90269393b445953",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A \u003ctt\u003ePhoenix.Socket\u003c/tt\u003e must be configured with the \u003ctt\u003elongpoll\u003c/tt\u003e option enabled. Phoenix LiveView applications enable the longpoll transport by default via the \u003ctt\u003e/live\u003c/tt\u003e socket."
}
],
"value": "A Phoenix.Socket must be configured with the longpoll option enabled. Phoenix LiveView applications enable the longpoll transport by default via the /live socket."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:phoenixframework:phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.7.22",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.7.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:phoenixframework:phoenix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.8.6",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.8.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in phoenixframework phoenix allows a denial of service via the long-poll transport\u0027s NDJSON body handling.\u003cp\u003eIn \u003ctt\u003e\u0027Elixir.Phoenix.Transports.LongPoll\u0027:publish/4\u003c/tt\u003e, when a POST request is received with \u003ctt\u003eContent-Type: application/x-ndjson\u003c/tt\u003e, the request body is split on newline characters using \u003ctt\u003eString.split/2\u003c/tt\u003e with no limit on the number of resulting segments. An attacker can send a body consisting entirely of newline bytes, causing a 1:1 amplification into a list of empty binaries \u2014 a 1 MB body produces approximately one million list elements, an 8 MB body approximately 8.4 million. Each element is then walked by \u003ctt\u003eEnum.map\u003c/tt\u003e, materializing another list of the same size. This exhausts BEAM memory and schedulers, crashing the node and terminating all active sessions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA session token required to reach the vulnerable endpoint is freely obtainable by any client via an unauthenticated GET request to the same URL with a matching \u003ctt\u003eOrigin\u003c/tt\u003e header, making this attack effectively unauthenticated.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects phoenix: from 1.7.0 before 1.7.22 and 1.8.6.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in phoenixframework phoenix allows a denial of service via the long-poll transport\u0027s NDJSON body handling.\n\nIn \u0027Elixir.Phoenix.Transports.LongPoll\u0027:publish/4, when a POST request is received with Content-Type: application/x-ndjson, the request body is split on newline characters using String.split/2 with no limit on the number of resulting segments. An attacker can send a body consisting entirely of newline bytes, causing a 1:1 amplification into a list of empty binaries \u2014 a 1 MB body produces approximately one million list elements, an 8 MB body approximately 8.4 million. Each element is then walked by Enum.map, materializing another list of the same size. This exhausts BEAM memory and schedulers, crashing the node and terminating all active sessions.\n\nA session token required to reach the vulnerable endpoint is freely obtainable by any client via an unauthenticated GET request to the same URL with a matching Origin header, making this attack effectively unauthenticated.\n\nThis issue affects phoenix: from 1.7.0 before 1.7.22 and 1.8.6."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-130",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-130 Excessive Allocation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T04:25:07.013Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/security/advisories/GHSA-628h-q48j-jr6q"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32689.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32689"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/commit/1a67c61ff9ce0a7711662ac7354861917a7c80f7"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/commit/912ea181fd247c21dbcc49fb97d0053b947d81bf"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Long-poll NDJSON body splitting causes unbounded memory allocation in Phoenix",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Disable the longpoll transport on all \u003ctt\u003ePhoenix.Socket\u003c/tt\u003e declarations, including the LiveView \u003ctt\u003e/live\u003c/tt\u003e socket, by removing or setting \u003ctt\u003elongpoll: false\u003c/tt\u003e. Note that this prevents clients that cannot use WebSockets from connecting."
}
],
"value": "Disable the longpoll transport on all Phoenix.Socket declarations, including the LiveView /live socket, by removing or setting longpoll: false. Note that this prevents clients that cannot use WebSockets from connecting."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32689",
"datePublished": "2026-05-05T15:17:30.664Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-13T09:12:14.475Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-07T04:25:07.013Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-32934 (GCVE-0-2026-32934)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-05 19:06 – Updated: 2026-05-06 15:14
VLAI
Title
CoreDNS DNS-over-QUIC unbounded goroutine growth leads to denial of service
Summary
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) server can be driven into unbounded goroutine and memory growth by a remote client that opens many QUIC streams and sends only 1 byte per stream. When the worker pool is full, CoreDNS still spawns a goroutine per accepted stream to wait for a worker token. Additionally, active workers block indefinitely in io.ReadFull() with no per-stream read deadline, allowing an attacker to pin all workers by sending a single byte so the read blocks waiting for the second byte of the DoQ length prefix. This enables an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory exhaustion and OOM-kill. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3. No known workarounds exist.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/coredns/coredns/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/coredns/coredns/releases/tag/v1.14.3 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32934",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-06T15:14:18.362180Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-06T15:14:54.790Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns/security/advisories/GHSA-2wpx-qpw2-g5h5"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "coredns",
"vendor": "coredns",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.14.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) server can be driven into unbounded goroutine and memory growth by a remote client that opens many QUIC streams and sends only 1 byte per stream. When the worker pool is full, CoreDNS still spawns a goroutine per accepted stream to wait for a worker token. Additionally, active workers block indefinitely in io.ReadFull() with no per-stream read deadline, allowing an attacker to pin all workers by sending a single byte so the read blocks waiting for the second byte of the DoQ length prefix. This enables an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory exhaustion and OOM-kill. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3. No known workarounds exist."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-05T19:06:17.080Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns/security/advisories/GHSA-2wpx-qpw2-g5h5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns/security/advisories/GHSA-2wpx-qpw2-g5h5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns/releases/tag/v1.14.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/coredns/coredns/releases/tag/v1.14.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2wpx-qpw2-g5h5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "CoreDNS DNS-over-QUIC unbounded goroutine growth leads to denial of service"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32934",
"datePublished": "2026-05-05T19:06:17.080Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-17T00:05:53.282Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-06T15:14:54.790Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-32941 (GCVE-0-2026-32941)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-20 03:37 – Updated: 2026-03-21 02:53
VLAI
Title
Sliver Vulnerable to Authenticated OOM via Memory Exhaustion in mTLS/WireGuard Transports
Summary
Sliver is a command and control framework that uses a custom Wireguard netstack. Versions 1.7.3 and below contain a Remote OOM (Out-of-Memory) vulnerability in the Sliver C2 server's mTLS and WireGuard C2 transport layer. The socketReadEnvelope and socketWGReadEnvelope functions trust an attacker-controlled 4-byte length prefix to allocate memory, with ServerMaxMessageSize allowing single allocations of up to ~2 GiB. A compromised implant or an attacker with valid credentials can exploit this by sending fabricated length prefixes over concurrent yamux streams (up to 128 per connection), forcing the server to attempt allocating ~256 GiB of memory and triggering an OS OOM kill. This crashes the Sliver server, disrupts all active implant sessions, and may degrade or kill other processes sharing the same host. The same pattern also affects all implant-side readers, which have no upper-bound check at all. The issue was not fixed at the the time of publication.
Severity
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/BishopFox/sliver/security/advi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32941",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-21T02:53:15.841645Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-21T02:53:38.174Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "sliver",
"vendor": "BishopFox",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c= 1.7.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Sliver is a command and control framework that uses a custom Wireguard netstack. Versions 1.7.3 and below contain a Remote OOM (Out-of-Memory) vulnerability in the Sliver C2 server\u0027s mTLS and WireGuard C2 transport layer. The socketReadEnvelope and socketWGReadEnvelope functions trust an attacker-controlled 4-byte length prefix to allocate memory, with ServerMaxMessageSize allowing single allocations of up to ~2 GiB. A compromised implant or an attacker with valid credentials can exploit this by sending fabricated length prefixes over concurrent yamux streams (up to 128 per connection), forcing the server to attempt allocating ~256 GiB of memory and triggering an OS OOM kill. This crashes the Sliver server, disrupts all active implant sessions, and may degrade or kill other processes sharing the same host. The same pattern also affects all implant-side readers, which have no upper-bound check at all. The issue was not fixed at the the time of publication."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-789",
"description": "CWE-789: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T03:37:40.884Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/BishopFox/sliver/security/advisories/GHSA-97vp-pwqj-46qc",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/BishopFox/sliver/security/advisories/GHSA-97vp-pwqj-46qc"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-97vp-pwqj-46qc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Sliver Vulnerable to Authenticated OOM via Memory Exhaustion in mTLS/WireGuard Transports"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32941",
"datePublished": "2026-03-20T03:37:40.884Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-17T00:05:53.283Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-21T02:53:38.174Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-32980 (GCVE-0-2026-32980)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-29 12:44 – Updated: 2026-03-30 16:02
VLAI
Title
OpenClaw < 2026.3.13 - Resource Exhaustion via Unauthenticated Telegram Webhook Request
Summary
OpenClaw before 2026.3.13 reads and buffers Telegram webhook request bodies before validating the x-telegram-bot-api-secret-token header, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resources. Attackers can send POST requests to the webhook endpoint to force memory consumption, socket time, and JSON parsing work before authentication validation occurs.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/adv… | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/7e49e… | patch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-res… | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-03-14 00:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32980",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T16:02:47.463236Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T16:02:56.784Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/openclaw",
"product": "OpenClaw",
"vendor": "OpenClaw",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2026.3.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "2026.3.13",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openclaw:openclaw:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2026.3.13",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "space08"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenClaw before 2026.3.13 reads and buffers Telegram webhook request bodies before validating the x-telegram-bot-api-secret-token header, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resources. Attackers can send POST requests to the webhook endpoint to force memory consumption, socket time, and JSON parsing work before authentication validation occurs."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-29T12:44:28.919Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-jq3f-vjww-8rq7)",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-jq3f-vjww-8rq7"
},
{
"name": "Patch Commit",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/7e49e98f79073b11134beac27fdff547ba5a4a02"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.13 - Resource Exhaustion via Unauthenticated Telegram Webhook Request",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-resource-exhaustion-via-unauthenticated-telegram-webhook-request"
}
],
"title": "OpenClaw \u003c 2026.3.13 - Resource Exhaustion via Unauthenticated Telegram Webhook Request",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32980",
"datePublished": "2026-03-29T12:44:28.919Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-17T11:31:56.955Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T16:02:56.784Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33012 (GCVE-0-2026-33012)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-20 04:43 – Updated: 2026-03-20 16:02
VLAI
Title
Micronaut Framework vulnerable to a Denial of Service in HTML error response caching
Summary
Micronaut Framework is a JVM-based full stack Java framework designed for building modular, easily testable JVM applications. Versions 4.7.0 through 4.10.16 used an unbounded ConcurrentHashMap cache with no eviction policy in its DefaultHtmlErrorResponseBodyProvider. If the application throws an exception whose message may be influenced by an attacker, (for example, including request query value parameters) it could be used by remote attackers to cause an unbounded heap growth and OutOfMemoryError, leading to DoS. This issue has been fixed in version 4.10.7.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-c… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-c… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-c… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| micronaut-projects | micronaut-core |
Affected:
>= 4.7.0, < 4.10.17
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33012",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-20T15:59:33.202875Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T16:02:36.357Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "micronaut-core",
"vendor": "micronaut-projects",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.7.0, \u003c 4.10.17"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Micronaut Framework is a JVM-based full stack Java framework designed for building modular, easily testable JVM applications. Versions 4.7.0 through 4.10.16 used an unbounded ConcurrentHashMap cache with no eviction policy in its DefaultHtmlErrorResponseBodyProvider. If the application throws an exception whose message may be influenced by an attacker, (for example, including request query value parameters) it could be used by remote attackers to cause an unbounded heap growth and OutOfMemoryError, leading to DoS. This issue has been fixed in version 4.10.7."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T04:43:07.809Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/security/advisories/GHSA-2hcp-gjrf-7fhc",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/security/advisories/GHSA-2hcp-gjrf-7fhc"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/commit/1e2ba2c14386af3d47751732d02053a72b0b49b3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/commit/1e2ba2c14386af3d47751732d02053a72b0b49b3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/releases/tag/v4.10.17",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/micronaut-projects/micronaut-core/releases/tag/v4.10.17"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2hcp-gjrf-7fhc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Micronaut Framework vulnerable to a Denial of Service in HTML error response caching"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33012",
"datePublished": "2026-03-20T04:43:07.809Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-17T17:22:14.665Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-20T16:02:36.357Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33034 (GCVE-0-2026-33034)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-07 14:22 – Updated: 2026-04-07 20:44
VLAI
Title
Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in ASGI requests via memory upload limit bypass
Summary
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.
ASGI requests with a missing or understated `Content-Length` header could
bypass the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` limit when reading
`HttpRequest.body`, allowing remote attackers to load an unbounded request body into
memory.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Superior for reporting this issue.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/se… | vendor-advisory |
| https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce | mailing-list |
| https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/apr/07/… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| djangoproject | Django |
Affected:
6.0 , < 6.0.4
(semver)
Unaffected: 6.0.4 (semver) Affected: 5.2 , < 5.2.13 (semver) Unaffected: 5.2.13 (semver) Affected: 4.2 , < 4.2.30 (semver) Unaffected: 4.2.30 (semver) |
Date Public
2026-04-07 09:00
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33034",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-07T20:43:43.119514Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T20:44:01.819Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.org/project/Django/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "django",
"product": "Django",
"repo": "https://github.com/django/django/",
"vendor": "djangoproject",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.0.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.0.4",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.2.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "4.2.30",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.2.30",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Superior"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Natalia Bidart"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jacob Walls"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-07T09:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eASGI requests with a missing or understated `Content-Length` header could\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ebypass the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` limit when reading\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e`HttpRequest.body`, allowing remote attackers to load an unbounded request body into\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ememory.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEarlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDjango would like to thank Superior for reporting this issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30.\nASGI requests with a missing or understated `Content-Length` header could\r\nbypass the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` limit when reading\r\n`HttpRequest.body`, allowing remote attackers to load an unbounded request body into\r\nmemory.\nEarlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.\nDjango would like to thank Superior for reporting this issue."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-130",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-130: Excessive Allocation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/security/#security-issue-severity-levels",
"value": "low"
},
"type": "Django severity rating"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T14:22:59.942Z",
"orgId": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"shortName": "DSF"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Django security archive",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/"
},
{
"name": "Django releases announcements",
"tags": [
"mailing-list"
],
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/django-announce"
},
{
"name": "Django security releases issued: 6.0.4, 5.2.13, and 4.2.30",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/apr/07/security-releases/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-24T12:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Initial report received."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-17T12:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Vulnerability confirmed."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-07T09:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Security release issued."
}
],
"title": "Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in ASGI requests via memory upload limit bypass",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6a34fbeb-21d4-45e7-8e0a-62b95bc12c92",
"assignerShortName": "DSF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33034",
"datePublished": "2026-04-07T14:22:59.942Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-17T17:36:23.992Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-07T20:44:01.819Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Requirements
Description:
- Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either:
- The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question.
- The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays
- uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
Mitigation ID: MIT-38.1
Phases: Architecture and Design, Implementation
Description:
- If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery.
- Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
Mitigation ID: MIT-47
Phases: Operation, Architecture and Design
Strategy: Resource Limitation
Description:
- Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems.
- When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users.
- Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
CAPEC-125: Flooding
An adversary consumes the resources of a target by rapidly engaging in a large number of interactions with the target. This type of attack generally exposes a weakness in rate limiting or flow. When successful this attack prevents legitimate users from accessing the service and can cause the target to crash. This attack differs from resource depletion through leaks or allocations in that the latter attacks do not rely on the volume of requests made to the target but instead focus on manipulation of the target's operations. The key factor in a flooding attack is the number of requests the adversary can make in a given period of time. The greater this number, the more likely an attack is to succeed against a given target.
CAPEC-130: Excessive Allocation
An adversary causes the target to allocate excessive resources to servicing the attackers' request, thereby reducing the resources available for legitimate services and degrading or denying services. Usually, this attack focuses on memory allocation, but any finite resource on the target could be the attacked, including bandwidth, processing cycles, or other resources. This attack does not attempt to force this allocation through a large number of requests (that would be Resource Depletion through Flooding) but instead uses one or a small number of requests that are carefully formatted to force the target to allocate excessive resources to service this request(s). Often this attack takes advantage of a bug in the target to cause the target to allocate resources vastly beyond what would be needed for a normal request.
CAPEC-147: XML Ping of the Death
An attacker initiates a resource depletion attack where a large number of small XML messages are delivered at a sufficiently rapid rate to cause a denial of service or crash of the target. Transactions such as repetitive SOAP transactions can deplete resources faster than a simple flooding attack because of the additional resources used by the SOAP protocol and the resources necessary to process SOAP messages. The transactions used are immaterial as long as they cause resource utilization on the target. In other words, this is a normal flooding attack augmented by using messages that will require extra processing on the target.
CAPEC-197: Exponential Data Expansion
An adversary submits data to a target application which contains nested exponential data expansion to produce excessively large output. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. However, this capability can be abused to create excessive demands on a processor's CPU and memory. A small number of nested expansions can result in an exponential growth in demands on memory.
CAPEC-229: Serialized Data Parameter Blowup
This attack exploits certain serialized data parsers (e.g., XML, YAML, etc.) which manage data in an inefficient manner. The attacker crafts an serialized data file with multiple configuration parameters in the same dataset. In a vulnerable parser, this results in a denial of service condition where CPU resources are exhausted because of the parsing algorithm. The weakness being exploited is tied to parser implementation and not language specific.
CAPEC-230: Serialized Data with Nested Payloads
Applications often need to transform data in and out of a data format (e.g., XML and YAML) by using a parser. It may be possible for an adversary to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the parser when it is being processed. Many data format languages allow the definition of macro-like structures that can be used to simplify the creation of complex structures. By nesting these structures, causing the data to be repeatedly substituted, an adversary can cause the parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization.
CAPEC-231: Oversized Serialized Data Payloads
An adversary injects oversized serialized data payloads into a parser during data processing to produce adverse effects upon the parser such as exhausting system resources and arbitrary code execution.
CAPEC-469: HTTP DoS
An attacker performs flooding at the HTTP level to bring down only a particular web application rather than anything listening on a TCP/IP connection. This denial of service attack requires substantially fewer packets to be sent which makes DoS harder to detect. This is an equivalent of SYN flood in HTTP. The idea is to keep the HTTP session alive indefinitely and then repeat that hundreds of times. This attack targets resource depletion weaknesses in web server software. The web server will wait to attacker's responses on the initiated HTTP sessions while the connection threads are being exhausted.
CAPEC-482: TCP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the TCP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service. These attacks exploit the weakness within the TCP protocol where there is some state information for the connection the server needs to maintain. This often involves the use of TCP SYN messages.
CAPEC-486: UDP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the UDP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. Additionally, firewalls often open a port for each UDP connection destined for a service with an open UDP port, meaning the firewalls in essence save the connection state thus the high packet nature of a UDP flood can also overwhelm resources allocated to the firewall. UDP attacks can also target services like DNS or VoIP which utilize these protocols. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the UDP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-487: ICMP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the ICMP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming the available network bandwidth. A typical attack involves a victim server receiving ICMP packets at a high rate from a wide range of source addresses. Additionally, due to the session-less nature of the ICMP protocol, the source of a packet is easily spoofed making it difficult to find the source of the attack.
CAPEC-488: HTTP Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the HTTP protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming resources at the application layer such as web services and their infrastructure. These attacks use legitimate session-based HTTP GET requests designed to consume large amounts of a server's resources. Since these are legitimate sessions this attack is very difficult to detect.
CAPEC-489: SSL Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using the SSL protocol with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a service by consuming all the available resources on the server side. These attacks take advantage of the asymmetric relationship between the processing power used by the client and the processing power used by the server to create a secure connection. In this manner the attacker can make a large number of HTTPS requests on a low provisioned machine to tie up a disproportionately large number of resources on the server. The clients then continue to keep renegotiating the SSL connection. When multiplied by a large number of attacking machines, this attack can result in a crash or loss of service to legitimate users.
CAPEC-490: Amplification
An adversary may execute an amplification where the size of a response is far greater than that of the request that generates it. The goal of this attack is to use a relatively few resources to create a large amount of traffic against a target server. To execute this attack, an adversary send a request to a 3rd party service, spoofing the source address to be that of the target server. The larger response that is generated by the 3rd party service is then sent to the target server. By sending a large number of initial requests, the adversary can generate a tremendous amount of traffic directed at the target. The greater the discrepancy in size between the initial request and the final payload delivered to the target increased the effectiveness of this attack.
CAPEC-491: Quadratic Data Expansion
An adversary exploits macro-like substitution to cause a denial of service situation due to excessive memory being allocated to fully expand the data. The result of this denial of service could cause the application to freeze or crash. This involves defining a very large entity and using it multiple times in a single entity substitution. CAPEC-197 is a similar attack pattern, but it is easier to discover and defend against. This attack pattern does not perform multi-level substitution and therefore does not obviously appear to consume extensive resources.
CAPEC-493: SOAP Array Blowup
An adversary may execute an attack on a web service that uses SOAP messages in communication. By sending a very large SOAP array declaration to the web service, the attacker forces the web service to allocate space for the array elements before they are parsed by the XML parser. The attacker message is typically small in size containing a large array declaration of say 1,000,000 elements and a couple of array elements. This attack targets exhaustion of the memory resources of the web service.
CAPEC-494: TCP Fragmentation
An adversary may execute a TCP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of avoiding filtering rules of network controls, by attempting to fragment the TCP packet such that the headers flag field is pushed into the second fragment which typically is not filtered.
CAPEC-495: UDP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a UDP Fragmentation attack against a target server in an attempt to consume resources such as bandwidth and CPU. IP fragmentation occurs when an IP datagram is larger than the MTU of the route the datagram has to traverse. Typically the attacker will use large UDP packets over 1500 bytes of data which forces fragmentation as ethernet MTU is 1500 bytes. This attack is a variation on a typical UDP flood but it enables more network bandwidth to be consumed with fewer packets. Additionally it has the potential to consume server CPU resources and fill memory buffers associated with the processing and reassembling of fragmented packets.
CAPEC-496: ICMP Fragmentation
An attacker may execute a ICMP Fragmentation attack against a target with the intention of consuming resources or causing a crash. The attacker crafts a large number of identical fragmented IP packets containing a portion of a fragmented ICMP message. The attacker these sends these messages to a target host which causes the host to become non-responsive. Another vector may be sending a fragmented ICMP message to a target host with incorrect sizes in the header which causes the host to hang.
CAPEC-528: XML Flood
An adversary may execute a flooding attack using XML messages with the intent to deny legitimate users access to a web service. These attacks are accomplished by sending a large number of XML based requests and letting the service attempt to parse each one. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a XML Denial of Service (XDoS) due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crashing.