Common Weakness Enumeration
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Show details on NVD website
Back to CWE stats page
CWE-78
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
CVE-2025-5621 (GCVE-0-2025-5621)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-04 23:31 – Updated: 2025-06-05 14:10 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
Title
D-Link DIR-816 qosClassifier os command injection
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DIR-816 1.10CNB05 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function qosClassifier of the file /goform/qosClassifier. The manipulation of the argument dip_address/sip_address leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.311107 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.311107 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.589221 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/D-Li… | exploit |
| https://www.dlink.com/ | product |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-5621",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-05T13:20:17.784190Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-05T14:10:58.560Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/D-Link5/vuln_49/49.md"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "DIR-816",
"vendor": "D-Link",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.10CNB05"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "pjqwudi (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DIR-816 1.10CNB05 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function qosClassifier of the file /goform/qosClassifier. The manipulation of the argument dip_address/sip_address leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "In D-Link DIR-816 1.10CNB05 wurde eine Schwachstelle gefunden. Sie wurde als kritisch eingestuft. Betroffen ist die Funktion qosClassifier der Datei /goform/qosClassifier. Mittels dem Manipulieren des Arguments dip_address/sip_address mit unbekannten Daten kann eine os command injection-Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann \u00fcber das Netzwerk passieren. Der Exploit steht zur \u00f6ffentlichen Verf\u00fcgung."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-04T23:31:08.187Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-311107 | D-Link DIR-816 qosClassifier os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.311107"
},
{
"name": "VDB-311107 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.311107"
},
{
"name": "Submit #589221 | D-Link DIR816 1.10CNB05 OS Command Injection",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.589221"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/wudipjq/my_vuln/blob/main/D-Link5/vuln_49/49.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/"
}
],
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-04T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-06-04T13:15:30.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "D-Link DIR-816 qosClassifier os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-5621",
"datePublished": "2025-06-04T23:31:08.187Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-04T11:10:14.987Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-05T14:10:58.560Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-5743 (GCVE-0-2025-5743)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-06-10 08:15 – Updated: 2025-10-07 03:29
VLAI
Summary
CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
vulnerability exists that could cause remote control over the charging station when an authenticated user
modifies configuration parameters on the web server.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider Electric | EVLink WallBox |
Affected:
All Versions
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-5743",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-06-10T13:07:47.251060Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-06-10T13:07:58.480Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "EVLink WallBox",
"vendor": "Schneider Electric",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "All Versions"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)\nvulnerability exists that could cause remote control over the charging station when an authenticated user\nmodifies configuration parameters on the web server.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)\nvulnerability exists that could cause remote control over the charging station when an authenticated user\nmodifies configuration parameters on the web server."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T03:29:00.117Z",
"orgId": "076d1eb6-cfab-4401-b34d-6dfc2a413bdb",
"shortName": "schneider"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2025-161-03\u0026p_enDocType=Security+and+Safety+Notice\u0026p_File_Name=SEVD-2025-161-03.pdf"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "076d1eb6-cfab-4401-b34d-6dfc2a413bdb",
"assignerShortName": "schneider",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-5743",
"datePublished": "2025-06-10T08:15:42.268Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-06-05T15:26:11.512Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-07T03:29:00.117Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-57771 (GCVE-0-2025-57771)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-22 16:35 – Updated: 2025-08-22 20:03
VLAI
Title
Roo-Code potential remote code execution via auto-execute command parsing flaw
Summary
Roo Code is an AI-powered autonomous coding agent that lives in users' editors. In versions prior to 3.25.5, Roo-Code fails to properly handle process substitution and single ampersand characters in the command parsing logic for auto-execute commands. If a user has enabled auto-approved execution for a command such as ls, an attacker who can submit crafted prompts to the agent may inject arbitrary commands to be executed alongside the intended command. Exploitation requires attacker access to submit prompts and for the user to have enabled auto-approved command execution, which is disabled by default. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. The issue is fixed in version 3.25.5.
Severity
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/commit/de3… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RooCodeInc | Roo-Code |
Affected:
< 3.25.5
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-57771",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-22T20:03:36.094820Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-22T20:03:48.870Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Roo-Code",
"vendor": "RooCodeInc",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.25.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Roo Code is an AI-powered autonomous coding agent that lives in users\u0027 editors. In versions prior to 3.25.5, Roo-Code fails to properly handle process substitution and single ampersand characters in the command parsing logic for auto-execute commands. If a user has enabled auto-approved execution for a command such as ls, an attacker who can submit crafted prompts to the agent may inject arbitrary commands to be executed alongside the intended command. Exploitation requires attacker access to submit prompts and for the user to have enabled auto-approved command execution, which is disabled by default. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. The issue is fixed in version 3.25.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-22T16:35:47.577Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/security/advisories/GHSA-wrh9-463x-7wvv",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/security/advisories/GHSA-wrh9-463x-7wvv"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/commit/de359a465c67aefc67553aa2b464591b602c4bdc",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/commit/de359a465c67aefc67553aa2b464591b602c4bdc"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-wrh9-463x-7wvv",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Roo-Code potential remote code execution via auto-execute command parsing flaw"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-57771",
"datePublished": "2025-08-22T16:35:47.577Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-19T15:16:22.917Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-22T20:03:48.870Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-57799 (GCVE-0-2025-57799)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-01 15:46 – Updated: 2025-09-02 18:09
VLAI
Title
StreamVault can perform remote command execution
Summary
StreamVault is a multi-platform video parsing and downloading tool. Prior to version 250822, after logging into the StreamVault-system, an attacker can modify certain system parameters, construct malicious commands, execute command injection attacks against the system, and ultimately gain server privileges. Users of all versions of the StreamVault system to date who have not modified their background passwords or use weak passwords are at risk of having their systems taken over via remote command execution. This issue has been patched in version 250822.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/lemon8866/StreamVault/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/lemon8866/StreamVault/commit/2… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| lemon8866 | StreamVault |
Affected:
< 250822
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-57799",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-02T17:46:44.477541Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T18:09:44.881Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "StreamVault",
"vendor": "lemon8866",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 250822"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "StreamVault is a multi-platform video parsing and downloading tool. Prior to version 250822, after logging into the StreamVault-system, an attacker can modify certain system parameters, construct malicious commands, execute command injection attacks against the system, and ultimately gain server privileges. Users of all versions of the StreamVault system to date who have not modified their background passwords or use weak passwords are at risk of having their systems taken over via remote command execution. This issue has been patched in version 250822."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-01T15:46:27.137Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/lemon8866/StreamVault/security/advisories/GHSA-qg4r-92hv-g9f4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lemon8866/StreamVault/security/advisories/GHSA-qg4r-92hv-g9f4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/lemon8866/StreamVault/commit/2e3f1f54b7d8a4e6389b640796866ac1108780ef",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/lemon8866/StreamVault/commit/2e3f1f54b7d8a4e6389b640796866ac1108780ef"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qg4r-92hv-g9f4",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "StreamVault can perform remote command execution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-57799",
"datePublished": "2025-09-01T15:46:27.137Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-20T14:30:35.009Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-02T18:09:44.881Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-58034 (GCVE-0-2025-58034)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-18 17:01 – Updated: 2026-02-26 16:21
VLAI
Summary
An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code on the underlying system via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: active
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Execute unauthorized code or commands
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-513 | |
| https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilit… | government-resource |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortinet | FortiWeb |
Affected:
7.6.0 , ≤ 7.6.4
(semver)
Affected: 7.4.0 , ≤ 7.4.8 (semver) Affected: 7.2.0 , ≤ 7.2.11 (semver) Affected: 7.0.2 , ≤ 7.0.11 (semver) cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58034",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "active"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-19T04:55:37.672981Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"dateAdded": "2025-11-18",
"reference": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-58034"
},
"type": "kev"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T16:21:13.757Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"government-resource"
],
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-58034"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-18T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "CVE-2025-58034 added to CISA KEV"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiweb:7.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "FortiWeb",
"vendor": "Fortinet",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.6.4",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.6.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.4.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.2.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.2.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.11",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code on the underlying system via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Execute unauthorized code or commands",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-01-14T09:16:02.977Z",
"orgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"shortName": "fortinet"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-513",
"url": "https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-513"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to FortiWeb version 8.0.2 or above\nUpgrade to FortiWeb version 7.6.6 or above\nUpgrade to FortiWeb version 7.4.11 or above\nUpgrade to FortiWeb version 7.2.12 or above\nUpgrade to FortiWeb version 7.0.12 or above"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6abe59d8-c742-4dff-8ce8-9b0ca1073da8",
"assignerShortName": "fortinet",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58034",
"datePublished": "2025-11-18T17:01:13.513Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-22T13:55:12.100Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T16:21:13.757Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-58059 (GCVE-0-2025-58059)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-28 17:50 – Updated: 2025-08-28 18:15
VLAI
Title
Valtimo scripting engine can be used to gain access to sensitive data or resources
Summary
Valtimo is a platform for Business Process Automation. In versions before 12.16.0.RELEASE, and from 13.0.0.RELEASE to before 13.1.2.RELEASE, any admin that can create or modify and execute process-definitions could gain access to sensitive data or resources. This includes but is not limited to: running executables on the application host, inspecting and extracting data from the host environment or application properties, spring beans (application context, database pooling). The following conditions have to be met in order to perform this attack: the user must be logged in, have the admin role, and must have some knowledge about running scripts via a the Camunda/Operator engine. Version 12.16.0 and 13.1.2 have been patched. It is strongly advised to upgrade. If no scripting is needed in any of the processes, it could be possible to disable it altogether via the ProcessEngineConfiguration. However, this workaround could lead to unexpected side-effects.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/valtimo-platform/valtimo-backe… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/valtimo-platform/valtimo-backe… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| valtimo-platform | valtimo-backend-libraries |
Affected:
< 12.16.0.RELEASE
Affected: >= 13.0.0.RELEASE, < 13.1.2.RELEASE |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58059",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-28T18:15:12.189145Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T18:15:17.669Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "valtimo-backend-libraries",
"vendor": "valtimo-platform",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 12.16.0.RELEASE"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 13.0.0.RELEASE, \u003c 13.1.2.RELEASE"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Valtimo is a platform for Business Process Automation. In versions before 12.16.0.RELEASE, and from 13.0.0.RELEASE to before 13.1.2.RELEASE, any admin that can create or modify and execute process-definitions could gain access to sensitive data or resources. This includes but is not limited to: running executables on the application host, inspecting and extracting data from the host environment or application properties, spring beans (application context, database pooling). The following conditions have to be met in order to perform this attack: the user must be logged in, have the admin role, and must have some knowledge about running scripts via a the Camunda/Operator engine. Version 12.16.0 and 13.1.2 have been patched. It is strongly advised to upgrade. If no scripting is needed in any of the processes, it could be possible to disable it altogether via the ProcessEngineConfiguration. However, this workaround could lead to unexpected side-effects."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-200",
"description": "CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T17:50:50.585Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/valtimo-platform/valtimo-backend-libraries/security/advisories/GHSA-w48j-pp7j-fj55",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/valtimo-platform/valtimo-backend-libraries/security/advisories/GHSA-w48j-pp7j-fj55"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/valtimo-platform/valtimo-backend-libraries/commit/45eb60b0b2df5964fb9917295d0dceb1fff8dd85",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/valtimo-platform/valtimo-backend-libraries/commit/45eb60b0b2df5964fb9917295d0dceb1fff8dd85"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-w48j-pp7j-fj55",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Valtimo scripting engine can be used to gain access to sensitive data or resources"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58059",
"datePublished": "2025-08-28T17:50:50.585Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-22T14:30:32.222Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T18:15:17.669Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-58062 (GCVE-0-2025-58062)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-28 22:14 – Updated: 2025-08-29 13:24
VLAI
Title
LSTM-Kirigaya's openmcp-client Vulnerable to RCE in MCP Authorization Flow
Summary
LSTM-Kirigaya's openmcp-client is a vscode plugin for mcp developer. Prior to version 0.1.12, when users on a Windows platform connect to an attacker controlled MCP server, attackers could provision a malicious authorization server endpoint to silently achieve an OS command injection attack in the open() invocation, leading to client system compromise. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.12.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/LSTM-Kirigaya/openmcp-client/s… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/LSTM-Kirigaya/openmcp-client/c… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lSqFkc412aX6a_fj… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSTM-Kirigaya | openmcp-client |
Affected:
< 0.1.12
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58062",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-08-29T13:24:31.914593Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-29T13:24:44.632Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "openmcp-client",
"vendor": "LSTM-Kirigaya",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.1.12"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "LSTM-Kirigaya\u0027s openmcp-client is a vscode plugin for mcp developer. Prior to version 0.1.12, when users on a Windows platform connect to an attacker controlled MCP server, attackers could provision a malicious authorization server endpoint to silently achieve an OS command injection attack in the open() invocation, leading to client system compromise. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.12."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "ACTIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-28T22:14:01.744Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/LSTM-Kirigaya/openmcp-client/security/advisories/GHSA-43m4-p3rv-c4v8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/LSTM-Kirigaya/openmcp-client/security/advisories/GHSA-43m4-p3rv-c4v8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/LSTM-Kirigaya/openmcp-client/commit/9c3799d6ffae8d0cdfab25a53af75e1afc85f6c3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/LSTM-Kirigaya/openmcp-client/commit/9c3799d6ffae8d0cdfab25a53af75e1afc85f6c3"
},
{
"name": "https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lSqFkc412aX6a_fjmNfzXsJKE7b8jPqD/view?usp=sharing",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lSqFkc412aX6a_fjmNfzXsJKE7b8jPqD/view?usp=sharing"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-43m4-p3rv-c4v8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "LSTM-Kirigaya\u0027s openmcp-client Vulnerable to RCE in MCP Authorization Flow"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58062",
"datePublished": "2025-08-28T22:14:01.744Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-22T14:30:32.222Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-08-29T13:24:44.632Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-58116 (GCVE-0-2025-58116)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-17 03:08 – Updated: 2025-09-17 13:34
VLAI
Summary
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') issue exists in WN-7D36QR and WN-7D36QR/UE. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a remote authenticated attacker.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-O DATA DEVICE, INC. | WN-7D36QR |
Affected:
firmware Ver.1.1.3 and prior versions
|
|
| I-O DATA DEVICE, INC. | WN-7D36QR/UE |
Affected:
firmware Ver.1.1.3 and prior versions
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58116",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-17T13:33:50.768851Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T13:34:00.567Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "WN-7D36QR",
"vendor": "I-O DATA DEVICE, INC.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "firmware Ver.1.1.3 and prior versions"
}
]
},
{
"product": "WN-7D36QR/UE",
"vendor": "I-O DATA DEVICE, INC.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "firmware Ver.1.1.3 and prior versions"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027) issue exists in WN-7D36QR and WN-7D36QR/UE. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a remote authenticated attacker."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en-US",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en-US",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T03:08:40.791Z",
"orgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"shortName": "jpcert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.iodata.jp/support/information/2025/09_wn-7d36qr/index.htm"
},
{
"url": "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU97490987/"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ede6fdc4-6654-4307-a26d-3331c018e2ce",
"assignerShortName": "jpcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58116",
"datePublished": "2025-09-17T03:08:40.791Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-09-10T08:04:11.408Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-17T13:34:00.567Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-58180 (GCVE-0-2025-58180)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-09 19:34 – Updated: 2025-09-10 13:59
VLAI
Title
OctoPrint is Vulnerable to RCE Attacks via Unsanitized Filename in File Upload
Summary
OctoPrint provides a web interface for controlling consumer 3D printers. OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.11.2 contain a vulnerability that allows an authenticated attacker to upload a file under a specially crafted filename that will allow arbitrary command execution if said filename becomes included in a command defined in a system event handler and said event gets triggered. If no event handlers executing system commands with uploaded filenames as parameters have been configured, this vulnerability does not have an impact. The vulnerability is patched in version 1.11.3. As a workaround, OctoPrint administrators who have event handlers configured that include any kind of filename based placeholders should disable those by setting their `enabled` property to `False` or unchecking the "Enabled" checkbox in the GUI based Event Manager. Alternatively, OctoPrint administrators should set `feature.enforceReallyUniversalFilenames` to `true` in `config.yaml` and restart OctoPrint, then vet the existing uploads and make sure to delete any suspicious looking files. As always, OctoPrint administrators are advised to not expose OctoPrint on hostile networks like the public internet, and to vet who has access to their instance.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/commit/be4… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/commit/c3a… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58180",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-10T13:59:03.369589Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-10T13:59:11.561Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "OctoPrint",
"vendor": "OctoPrint",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.11.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OctoPrint provides a web interface for controlling consumer 3D printers. OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.11.2 contain a vulnerability that allows an authenticated attacker to upload a file under a specially crafted filename that will allow arbitrary command execution if said filename becomes included in a command defined in a system event handler and said event gets triggered. If no event handlers executing system commands with uploaded filenames as parameters have been configured, this vulnerability does not have an impact. The vulnerability is patched in version 1.11.3. As a workaround, OctoPrint administrators who have event handlers configured that include any kind of filename based placeholders should disable those by setting their `enabled` property to `False` or unchecking the \"Enabled\" checkbox in the GUI based Event Manager. Alternatively, OctoPrint administrators should set `feature.enforceReallyUniversalFilenames` to `true` in `config.yaml` and restart OctoPrint, then vet the existing uploads and make sure to delete any suspicious looking files. As always, OctoPrint administrators are advised to not expose OctoPrint on hostile networks like the public internet, and to vet who has access to their instance."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-09T19:34:14.765Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/security/advisories/GHSA-49mj-x8jp-qvfc",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/security/advisories/GHSA-49mj-x8jp-qvfc"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/commit/be4201ef58d9a7c03593252398c16eada90a258b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/commit/be4201ef58d9a7c03593252398c16eada90a258b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/commit/c3a940962f4658a8e035a00388781b1cbd768841",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/commit/c3a940962f4658a8e035a00388781b1cbd768841"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/releases/tag/1.11.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/OctoPrint/OctoPrint/releases/tag/1.11.3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-49mj-x8jp-qvfc",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OctoPrint is Vulnerable to RCE Attacks via Unsanitized Filename in File Upload"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58180",
"datePublished": "2025-09-09T19:34:14.765Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-27T13:34:56.190Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-10T13:59:11.561Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
CVE-2025-58370 (GCVE-0-2025-58370)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-05 22:09 – Updated: 2025-09-08 20:10
VLAI
Title
Roo Code: Potential Remote Code Execution via Bash Parameter Expansion and Indirect Reference
Summary
Roo Code is an AI-powered autonomous coding agent that lives in users' editors. Versions below 3.26.0 contain a vulnerability in the command parsing logic where the Bash parameter expansion and indirect reference were not handled correctly. If the agent was configured to auto-approve execution of certain commands, an attacker able to influence prompts could abuse this weakness to execute additional arbitrary commands alongside the intended one. This is fixed in version 3.26.0.
Severity
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RooCodeInc | Roo-Code |
Affected:
< 3.26.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-58370",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-09-08T20:10:04.725591Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-08T20:10:12.235Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Roo-Code",
"vendor": "RooCodeInc",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.26.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Roo Code is an AI-powered autonomous coding agent that lives in users\u0027 editors. Versions below 3.26.0 contain a vulnerability in the command parsing logic where the Bash parameter expansion and indirect reference were not handled correctly. If the agent was configured to auto-approve execution of certain commands, an attacker able to influence prompts could abuse this weakness to execute additional arbitrary commands alongside the intended one. This is fixed in version 3.26.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-05T22:09:52.492Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/security/advisories/GHSA-2rm5-cvcm-7592",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code/security/advisories/GHSA-2rm5-cvcm-7592"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2rm5-cvcm-7592",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Roo Code: Potential Remote Code Execution via Bash Parameter Expansion and Indirect Reference"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-58370",
"datePublished": "2025-09-05T22:09:04.786Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-08-29T16:19:59.012Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-09-08T20:10:12.235Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation ID: MIT-22
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
Description:
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation ID: MIT-15
Phase: Architecture and Design
Description:
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation ID: MIT-4.3
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
Description:
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation ID: MIT-28
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
Description:
- While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation ID: MIT-27
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
Description:
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation ID: MIT-5
Phase: Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
Description:
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation ID: MIT-21
Phase: Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
Description:
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-32
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation ID: MIT-39
Phase: Implementation
Description:
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Description:
- Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation ID: MIT-29
Phase: Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Description:
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation ID: MIT-17
Phases: Architecture and Design, Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation ID: MIT-16
Phases: Operation, Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Description:
- When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.