CERTA-2006-AVI-087
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:None
Description
Un dépassement de tampon dans le fichier Splash.cc peut laisser un utilisateur malveillant exécuter du code arbitraire. Il lui suffit de créer un document pdf contenant une image splash de taille anormalement grande.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
Toutes les versions xpdf, ainsi que ses dérivés, comme poppler, kdegraphics, gpdf ou pdfkit.framework.
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description |
|---|
References
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [],
"affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eToutes les versions \u003cTT\u003expdf\u003c/TT\u003e, ainsi que ses d\u00e9riv\u00e9s, comme \u003cTT\u003epoppler\u003c/TT\u003e, \u003cTT\u003ekdegraphics\u003c/TT\u003e, \u003cTT\u003egpdf\u003c/TT\u003e ou \u003cTT\u003epdfkit.framework\u003c/TT\u003e.\u003c/P\u003e",
"content": "## Description\n\nUn d\u00e9passement de tampon dans le fichier Splash.cc peut laisser un\nutilisateur malveillant ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire. Il lui suffit de\ncr\u00e9er un document pdf contenant une image splash de taille anormalement\ngrande.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2006-0301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-0301"
}
],
"links": [
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo GLSA-200602-04 du 12 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200602-04.xml"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandriva MDKSA-2006:030 du 2 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://wwwnew.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:030"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Debian DSA 974 du 15 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-974"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandriva MDKSA-2006:031 du 2 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://wwwnew.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:031"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Debian DSA 972 du 15 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-972"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 RedHat RHSA-2006:0201 du 13 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0201.html"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-249-1 du 14 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.ubuntulinux.org/usn/usn-249-1"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandriva MDKSA-2006:032 du 2 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://wwwnew.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:032"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 RedHat RHSA-2006:0206 du 13 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0206.html"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Debian DSA 971 du 14 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-971"
},
{
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo GLSA-200602-05 du 12 f\u00e9vrier 2006 :",
"url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200602-05.xml"
}
],
"reference": "CERTA-2006-AVI-087",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2006-02-22T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
}
],
"summary": null,
"title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de Xpdf et ses d\u00e9riv\u00e9s",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin d\u0027erreurs du site Novell",
"url": null
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…