CERTA-2012-AVI-326

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Deux vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans le noyau Microsoft Windows. La première intervient lorsque le mode utilisateur requête le « Scheduler » système et la deuxième concerne une altération en mémoire de la ROM BIOS.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Microsoft Windows Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Service Pack 1.
Microsoft Windows Windows XP Service Pack 3 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows 7 x64 Service Pack 1 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows 7 x64 ;
Microsoft Windows Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 ;
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Service Pack 1.",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows XP Service Pack 3 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows 7 x64 Service Pack 1 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows 7 x64 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 ;",
      "product": {
        "name": "Windows",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Microsoft",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-1515",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-1515"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0217",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0217"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-326",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2012-06-13T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Deux vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans le noyau \u003cspan\nclass=\"textit\"\u003eMicrosoft Windows\u003c/span\u003e. La premi\u00e8re intervient lorsque\nle mode utilisateur requ\u00eate le \u00ab Scheduler \u00bb syst\u00e8me et la deuxi\u00e8me\nconcerne une alt\u00e9ration en m\u00e9moire de la ROM BIOS.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Windows",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Microsoft MS12-042 du 12 juin 2012",
      "url": "http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/MS12-042"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.