CERTA-2012-AVI-351

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Cinq vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans IBM Lotus Expeditor. Elles sont réparties comme suit :

  • (CVE-2012-0186) une URL spécialement conçue permet de lire arbitrairement des ressources sensibles ;
  • (CVE-2012-0191) en modifiant son en-tête HTTP un attaquant peut contourner les restrictions du serveur à certaines zones ;
  • (CVE-2012-0187) le chargement d'une bibliothèque (DLL) arbitraire lors du chargement de certains fichiers ;
  • (CVE-2008-7271 et CVE-2008-4647) deux injections de code indirecte à distance (XSS).

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Versions antérieures à IBM Lotus Expeditor 6.2 FP5+Security Pack.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eVersions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 IBM Lotus Expeditor 6.2 FP5+Security  Pack.\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-4647",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-4647"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0186",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0186"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2008-7271",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-7271"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0191",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0191"
    },
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-0187",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-0187"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-351",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2012-06-25T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Cinq vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eIBM\nLotus Expeditor\u003c/span\u003e. Elles sont r\u00e9parties comme suit :\n\n-   (CVE-2012-0186) une URL sp\u00e9cialement con\u00e7ue permet de lire\n    arbitrairement des ressources sensibles ;\n-   (CVE-2012-0191) en modifiant son en-t\u00eate HTTP un attaquant peut\n    contourner les restrictions du serveur \u00e0 certaines zones ;\n-   (CVE-2012-0187) le chargement d\u0027une biblioth\u00e8que (DLL) arbitraire\n    lors du chargement de certains fichiers ;\n-   (CVE-2008-7271 et CVE-2008-4647) deux injections de code indirecte \u00e0\n    distance (XSS).\n",
  "title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans IBM Lotus Expeditor",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM swg21575642 du 21 juin 2012",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21575642"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.