CERTA-2012-AVI-674

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Une vulnérabilité a été corrigée dans Lighttpd. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance au moyen de requêtes HTTP spécialement conçues.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Lighttpd version 1.4.31

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
References

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eLighttpd version 1.4.31\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2012-5533",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-5533"
    }
  ],
  "links": [],
  "reference": "CERTA-2012-AVI-674",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2012-11-22T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9e dans \u003cspan\nclass=\"textit\"\u003eLighttpd\u003c/span\u003e. Elle permet \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer\nun d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance au moyen de requ\u00eates HTTP sp\u00e9cialement\ncon\u00e7ues.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Lighttpd",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Lighttpd du 21 novembre 2012",
      "url": "http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd_sa_2012_01.txt"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…