CERTFR-2016-AVI-303
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans les produits Citrix. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Solution
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
NoneImpacted products
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrix | XenServer | Citrix XenServer version 6.0 sans le correctif de sécurité XS60E063 | ||
| Citrix | NetScaler | Micrologiciel LOM versions antérieures à 3.39 pour solutions matérielles embarquées NetScaler MPX/SDX de type 11500/13500/14500/16500/18500/20500, 115xx, 17550/19550/20550/21550 et T1110, ainsi que CloudBridge CB4000 et CB5000 | ||
| Citrix | XenServer | Citrix XenServer version 6.2 SP1 sans le correctif de sécurité XS62ESP1048 | ||
| Citrix | XenServer | Citrix XenServer version 6.1 sans le correctif de sécurité XS61E073 | ||
| Citrix | NetScaler | Micrologiciel LOM versions antérieures à 4.08 pour solutions matérielles embarquées NetScaler MPX/SDX de type 14xxx, 25xxx, T1120 et T1300 | ||
| Citrix | XenServer | Citrix XenServer version 6.0.2 Common Criteria sans le correctif de sécurité XS602ECC034 | ||
| Citrix | NetScaler | Micrologiciel LOM versions antérieures à 3.21 pour solutions matérielles embarquées NetScaler MPX/SDX de type 8xxx et T1010, ainsi que CloudBridge CB2000 et CB3000 | ||
| Citrix | XenServer | Citrix XenServer version 6.0.2 sans le correctif de sécurité XS602E057 | ||
| Citrix | XenServer | Citrix XenServer version 6.5 SP1 sans le correctif de sécurité XS65ESP1038 | ||
| Citrix | XenServer | Citrix XenServer version 7.0 sans le correctif de sécurité XS70E012 | ||
| Citrix | NetScaler | Micrologiciel LOM versions antérieures à 3.24 pour solutions matérielles embarquées NetScaler de type 22xxx et T1200 |
References
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Citrix XenServer version 6.0 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 XS60E063",
"product": {
"name": "XenServer",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Micrologiciel LOM versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.39 pour solutions mat\u00e9rielles embarqu\u00e9es NetScaler MPX/SDX de type 11500/13500/14500/16500/18500/20500, 115xx, 17550/19550/20550/21550 et T1110, ainsi que CloudBridge CB4000 et CB5000",
"product": {
"name": "NetScaler",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Citrix XenServer version 6.2 SP1 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 XS62ESP1048",
"product": {
"name": "XenServer",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Citrix XenServer version 6.1 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 XS61E073",
"product": {
"name": "XenServer",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Micrologiciel LOM versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.08 pour solutions mat\u00e9rielles embarqu\u00e9es NetScaler MPX/SDX de type 14xxx, 25xxx, T1120 et T1300",
"product": {
"name": "NetScaler",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Citrix XenServer version 6.0.2 Common Criteria sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 XS602ECC034",
"product": {
"name": "XenServer",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Micrologiciel LOM versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.21 pour solutions mat\u00e9rielles embarqu\u00e9es NetScaler MPX/SDX de type 8xxx et T1010, ainsi que CloudBridge CB2000 et CB3000",
"product": {
"name": "NetScaler",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Citrix XenServer version 6.0.2 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 XS602E057",
"product": {
"name": "XenServer",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Citrix XenServer version 6.5 SP1 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 XS65ESP1038",
"product": {
"name": "XenServer",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Citrix XenServer version 7.0 sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 XS70E012",
"product": {
"name": "XenServer",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Micrologiciel LOM versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.24 pour solutions mat\u00e9rielles embarqu\u00e9es NetScaler de type 22xxx et T1200",
"product": {
"name": "NetScaler",
"vendor": {
"name": "Citrix",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": null,
"content": "## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-0292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-7094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-1791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-1791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-4434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-4434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-0288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-7093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-4000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-4000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-1789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-1789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-7154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-3619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-3619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-1788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-1788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-1792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-1792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-3622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-3622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-7092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-7092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-0204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-0293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-4421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-4421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-0287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-3608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-3608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-8275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-8275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-0205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-3620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-3620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-3609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-3609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-0209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-0209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2014-3569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2014-3569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-3607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-3607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-3621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-3621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-3623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-3623"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2016-AVI-303",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "version initiale.",
"revision_date": "2016-09-09T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 corrig\u00e9es dans \u003cspan\nclass=\"textit\"\u003eles produits Citrix\u003c/span\u003e. Certaines d\u0027entre elles\npermettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire\n\u00e0 distance, un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance et un contournement de la\npolitique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.\n",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits Citrix",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Citrix CTX216071 du 08 septembre 2016",
"url": "http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX216071"
},
{
"published_at": null,
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Citrix CTX216642 du 08 septembre 2016",
"url": "http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX216642"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…