CVE-2000-0568 (GCVE-0-2000-0568)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2001-09-18 04:00 – Updated: 2024-08-08 05:21
VLAI
Summary
Sybergen Secure Desktop 2.1 does not properly protect against false router advertisements (ICMP type 9), which allows remote attackers to modify default routes.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
URL Tags
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1417 vdb-entryx_refsource_BID
http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pi… mailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
Date Public
2000-06-30 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T05:21:30.921Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "1417",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1417"
          },
          {
            "name": "20000630 Multiple vulnerabilities in Sybergen Secure Desktop",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1\u0026msg=4125690E.00524395.00%40guardianit.se"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2000-06-30T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Sybergen Secure Desktop 2.1 does not properly protect against false router advertisements (ICMP type 9), which allows remote attackers to modify default routes."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2005-11-02T10:00:00.000Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "1417",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1417"
        },
        {
          "name": "20000630 Multiple vulnerabilities in Sybergen Secure Desktop",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1\u0026msg=4125690E.00524395.00%40guardianit.se"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2000-0568",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Sybergen Secure Desktop 2.1 does not properly protect against false router advertisements (ICMP type 9), which allows remote attackers to modify default routes."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "1417",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1417"
            },
            {
              "name": "20000630 Multiple vulnerabilities in Sybergen Secure Desktop",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1\u0026msg=4125690E.00524395.00@guardianit.se"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2000-0568",
    "datePublished": "2001-09-18T04:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2000-07-19T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T05:21:30.921Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2000-0568",
      "date": "2026-05-31",
      "epss": "0.00655",
      "percentile": "0.71315"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:sybergen:secure_desktop:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"B11EDF36-73D7-4B0D-B968-FEE9878690E6\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Sybergen Secure Desktop 2.1 does not properly protect against false router advertisements (ICMP type 9), which allows remote attackers to modify default routes.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2000-0568",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-20T23:32:47.873",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2000-06-30T04:00:00.000",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1417\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1\u0026msg=4125690E.00524395.00%40guardianit.se\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1417\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1\u0026msg=4125690E.00524395.00%40guardianit.se\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2000-0568\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2000-06-30T04:00:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-04-16T00:27:16.627\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Sybergen Secure Desktop 2.1 does not properly protect against false router advertisements (ICMP type 9), which allows remote attackers to modify default routes.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:sybergen:secure_desktop:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"B11EDF36-73D7-4B0D-B968-FEE9878690E6\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1417\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1\u0026msg=4125690E.00524395.00%40guardianit.se\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1417\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/archive.pike?list=1\u0026msg=4125690E.00524395.00%40guardianit.se\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.