CVE-2001-1006 (GCVE-0-2001-1006)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2002-02-02 05:00 – Updated: 2024-08-08 04:37
VLAI?
Summary
Starfish Truesync Desktop 2.0b as used on the REX 5000 PDA does not encrypt sensitive files and relies solely on its password feature to restrict access, which allows an attacker to read the files using a different application.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/210067 mailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3232 vdb-entryx_refsource_BID
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T04:37:07.198Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "20010824 Starfish Truesync Desktop + REX 5000 Pro multiple vulnerabilities",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/210067"
          },
          {
            "name": "3232",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3232"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2001-08-24T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Starfish Truesync Desktop 2.0b as used on the REX 5000 PDA does not encrypt sensitive files and relies solely on its password feature to restrict access, which allows an attacker to read the files using a different application."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2002-02-06T10:00:00",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "20010824 Starfish Truesync Desktop + REX 5000 Pro multiple vulnerabilities",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/210067"
        },
        {
          "name": "3232",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3232"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2001-1006",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Starfish Truesync Desktop 2.0b as used on the REX 5000 PDA does not encrypt sensitive files and relies solely on its password feature to restrict access, which allows an attacker to read the files using a different application."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20010824 Starfish Truesync Desktop + REX 5000 Pro multiple vulnerabilities",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/210067"
            },
            {
              "name": "3232",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3232"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2001-1006",
    "datePublished": "2002-02-02T05:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2002-01-31T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T04:37:07.198Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:starfish:truesync_desktop:2.0b:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"F45F9C53-6D90-431B-B8C2-D55E2C09DDA9\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Starfish Truesync Desktop 2.0b as used on the REX 5000 PDA does not encrypt sensitive files and relies solely on its password feature to restrict access, which allows an attacker to read the files using a different application.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2001-1006",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-20T23:36:38.830",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2001-08-31T04:00:00.000",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/210067\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3232\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/210067\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3232\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2001-1006\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2001-08-31T04:00:00.000\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-03T01:03:51.193\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Starfish Truesync Desktop 2.0b as used on the REX 5000 PDA does not encrypt sensitive files and relies solely on its password feature to restrict access, which allows an attacker to read the files using a different application.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:starfish:truesync_desktop:2.0b:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F45F9C53-6D90-431B-B8C2-D55E2C09DDA9\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/210067\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3232\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/210067\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3232\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.