CVE-2010-4533 (GCVE-0-2010-4533)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2019-11-13 18:30 – Updated: 2024-08-07 03:51
VLAI?
Summary
offlineimap before 6.3.4 added support for SSL server certificate validation but it is still possible to use SSL v2 protocol, which is a flawed protocol with multiple security deficiencies.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- Other
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| offlineimap | offlineimap |
Affected:
before 6.3.4
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T03:51:17.696Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4533"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4533"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2010-4533"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/12/23/2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606962"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "offlineimap",
"vendor": "offlineimap",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "before 6.3.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "offlineimap before 6.3.4 added support for SSL server certificate validation but it is still possible to use SSL v2 protocol, which is a flawed protocol with multiple security deficiencies."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Other",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2019-11-13T18:30:49.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4533"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4533"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2010-4533"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/12/23/2"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606962"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2010-4533",
"datePublished": "2019-11-13T18:30:49.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2010-12-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T03:51:17.696Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2010-4533",
"date": "2026-05-01",
"epss": "0.00276",
"percentile": "0.51007"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"07B237A9-69A3-4A9C-9DA0-4E06BD37AE73\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:offlineimap:offlineimap:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.3.4\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"267564A8-DFA5-43BD-9183-7E195C7D8FB4\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"offlineimap before 6.3.4 added support for SSL server certificate validation but it is still possible to use SSL v2 protocol, which is a flawed protocol with multiple security deficiencies.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"offlineimap versiones anteriores a la versi\\u00f3n 6.3.4, agreg\\u00f3 soporte para la comprobaci\\u00f3n de certificado del servidor SSL, pero a\\u00fan es posible utilizar el protocolo SSL versi\\u00f3n v2, que es un protocolo fallido con m\\u00faltiples deficiencias de seguridad.\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2010-4533",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:21:09.483",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 5.9}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 6.4, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
"published": "2019-11-13T19:15:10.740",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2010-4533\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Not Applicable\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606962\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4533\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4533\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/12/23/2\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2010-4533\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Not Applicable\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606962\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4533\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4533\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/12/23/2\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2010-4533\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2019-11-13T19:15:10.740\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:21:09.483\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"offlineimap before 6.3.4 added support for SSL server certificate validation but it is still possible to use SSL v2 protocol, which is a flawed protocol with multiple security deficiencies.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"offlineimap versiones anteriores a la versi\u00f3n 6.3.4, agreg\u00f3 soporte para la comprobaci\u00f3n de certificado del servidor SSL, pero a\u00fan es posible utilizar el protocolo SSL versi\u00f3n v2, que es un protocolo fallido con m\u00faltiples deficiencias de seguridad.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"07B237A9-69A3-4A9C-9DA0-4E06BD37AE73\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:offlineimap:offlineimap:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.3.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"267564A8-DFA5-43BD-9183-7E195C7D8FB4\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2010-4533\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Not Applicable\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606962\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4533\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4533\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/12/23/2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2010-4533\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Not Applicable\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606962\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-4533\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2010-4533\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/12/23/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…