CVE-2014-2072
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2020-01-08 15:42
Modified
2024-08-06 09:58
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Dassault Systemes Catia V5-6R2013: Stack Buffer Overflow due to inadequate boundary checks
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/125308/Catia-V5-6R2013-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html | Exploit, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry | |
cve@mitre.org | http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65675 | Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry | |
cve@mitre.org | https://www.exploit-database.net/?id=60103 | Exploit, Third Party Advisory |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T09:58:16.219Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/125308/Catia-V5-6R2013-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65675" }, { "name": "Exploit Database", "tags": [ "exploit", "x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://www.exploit-database.net/?id=60103" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Dassault Systemes Catia V5-6R2013: Stack Buffer Overflow due to inadequate boundary checks" } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2020-01-08T15:42:27", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/125308/Catia-V5-6R2013-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65675" }, { "name": "Exploit Database", "tags": [ "exploit", "x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB" ], "url": "https://www.exploit-database.net/?id=60103" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2014-2072", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Dassault Systemes Catia V5-6R2013: Stack Buffer Overflow due to inadequate boundary checks" } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/125308/Catia-V5-6R2013-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/125308/Catia-V5-6R2013-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65675", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65675" }, { "name": "Exploit Database", "refsource": "EXPLOIT-DB", "url": "https://www.exploit-database.net/?id=60103" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2014-2072", "datePublished": "2020-01-08T15:42:27", "dateReserved": "2014-02-19T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T09:58:16.219Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2014-2072\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2020-01-08T16:15:10.327\",\"lastModified\":\"2020-01-17T15:24:16.410\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Dassault Systemes Catia V5-6R2013: Stack Buffer Overflow due to inadequate boundary checks\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Dassault Systemes Catia versi\u00f3n V5-6R2013: un Desbordamiento del B\u00fafer de la Pila debido a comprobaciones de l\u00edmites inadecuadas\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"baseScore\":7.5},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:3ds:catia:v5-6r2013:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6EE16AE6-24A9-429D-AAB8-EA928840F6F1\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/125308/Catia-V5-6R2013-Stack-Buffer-Overflow.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65675\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.exploit-database.net/?id=60103\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.