CVE-2016-4458 (GCVE-0-2016-4458)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-07-28 16:45 – Updated: 2022-07-28 16:45DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-07-28T16:45:18.000Z",
"orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"shortName": "redhat"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
"assignerShortName": "redhat",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-4458",
"datePublished": "2022-07-28T16:45:18.000Z",
"dateRejected": "2022-07-28T16:45:18.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2016-05-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2022-07-28T16:45:18.000Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.0",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2016-4458",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:32:38.060",
"published": "2022-07-28T17:15:08.410",
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2016. Notes: none"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2016-4458",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:32:38.060",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2022-07-28T17:15:08.410",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.