CVE-2016-6582 (GCVE-0-2016-6582)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-01-23 21:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 01:36
VLAI?
Summary
The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:36:28.287Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "92551",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html"
},
{
"name": "20160818 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20160822 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2016-08-18T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2018-10-09T18:57:01",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "92551",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_BID"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html"
},
{
"name": "20160818 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20160822 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
"tags": [
"mailing-list",
"x_refsource_FULLDISC"
],
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2016-6582",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "92551",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html"
},
{
"name": "20160818 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "20160822 [CVE-2016-6582] Doorkeeper gem does not revoke tokens \u0026 uses wrong auth/auth method",
"refsource": "FULLDISC",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-6582",
"datePublished": "2017-01-23T21:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2016-08-03T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:36:28.287Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:doorkeeper_project:doorkeeper:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"4.1.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C1D455D8-18C2-4CC1-B959-09F3A1E5B66F\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"El Doorkeeper gem en versiones anteriores a 4.2.0 para Ruby podr\\u00edan permitir a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de repetici\\u00f3n o revocar tokens arbitrarios aprovechando el fallo para implementar la especificaci\\u00f3n OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation.\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2016-6582",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:56:22.877",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 9.1, \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 5.2}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 6.4, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 4.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
"published": "2017-01-23T21:59:02.110",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Release Notes\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Release Notes\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-254\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-6582\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2017-01-23T21:59:02.110\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-20T01:37:25.860\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The Doorkeeper gem before 4.2.0 for Ruby might allow remote attackers to conduct replay attacks or revoke arbitrary tokens by leveraging failure to implement the OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation specification.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"El Doorkeeper gem en versiones anteriores a 4.2.0 para Ruby podr\u00edan permitir a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de repetici\u00f3n o revocar tokens arbitrarios aprovechando el fallo para implementar la especificaci\u00f3n OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":6.4,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-254\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:doorkeeper_project:doorkeeper:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"4.1.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C1D455D8-18C2-4CC1-B959-09F3A1E5B66F\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Release Notes\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138430/Doorkeeper-4.1.0-Token-Revocation.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Aug/105\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539268/100/0/threaded\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92551\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/875\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/releases/tag/v4.2.0\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Release Notes\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…