CVE-2016-6594 (GCVE-0-2016-6594)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-06-08 20:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 01:36
VLAI
Summary
Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway 6.6, CacheFlow 3.4, ProxySG 6.5 and 6.6 allows remote attackers to bypass blocked requests, user authentication, and payload scanning.
Severity
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Date Public
2016-07-14 00:00
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:36:28.804Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "91404",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91404"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa130"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2016-07-14T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway 6.6, CacheFlow 3.4, ProxySG 6.5 and 6.6 allows remote attackers to bypass blocked requests, user authentication, and payload scanning."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-06-23T09:57:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "80d3bcb6-88de-48c2-a47e-aebf795f19b5",
        "shortName": "symantec"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "91404",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91404"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa130"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secure@symantec.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-6594",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway 6.6, CacheFlow 3.4, ProxySG 6.5 and 6.6 allows remote attackers to bypass blocked requests, user authentication, and payload scanning."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "91404",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91404"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa130",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa130"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "80d3bcb6-88de-48c2-a47e-aebf795f19b5",
    "assignerShortName": "symantec",
    "cveId": "CVE-2016-6594",
    "datePublished": "2017-06-08T20:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2016-08-03T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:36:28.804Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2016-6594",
      "date": "2026-05-25",
      "epss": "0.00734",
      "percentile": "0.72976"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:bluecoat:advanced_secure_gateway:6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C5CF6DF9-AF0F-455D-8268-F6A6D6241D03\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:bluecoat:cacheflow:3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"394EE24C-FD34-4346-862F-90306C352185\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:bluecoat:proxysg:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"2C7C7AB7-603E-4499-8C9B-C280C354C7BD\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:bluecoat:proxysg:6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"6675B614-BFD6-4B5E-85AA-95D402E8B3E2\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway 6.6, CacheFlow 3.4, ProxySG 6.5 and 6.6 allows remote attackers to bypass blocked requests, user authentication, and payload scanning.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway 6.6, CacheFlow 3.4, ProxySG versiones 6.5 y 6.6 permite a los atacantes remotos evitar las solicitudes bloqueadas, la autenticaci\\u00f3n del usuario y el escaneo de la carga \\u00fatil.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2016-6594",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:56:24.110",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2017-06-08T20:29:00.280",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91404\", \"source\": \"secure@symantec.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa130\", \"source\": \"secure@symantec.com\", \"tags\": [\"Mitigation\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91404\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa130\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mitigation\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secure@symantec.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-254\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-6594\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secure@symantec.com\",\"published\":\"2017-06-08T20:29:00.280\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-05-13T00:24:29.033\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway 6.6, CacheFlow 3.4, ProxySG 6.5 and 6.6 allows remote attackers to bypass blocked requests, user authentication, and payload scanning.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Blue Coat Advanced Secure Gateway 6.6, CacheFlow 3.4, ProxySG versiones 6.5 y 6.6 permite a los atacantes remotos evitar las solicitudes bloqueadas, la autenticaci\u00f3n del usuario y el escaneo de la carga \u00fatil.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-254\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bluecoat:advanced_secure_gateway:6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C5CF6DF9-AF0F-455D-8268-F6A6D6241D03\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bluecoat:cacheflow:3.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"394EE24C-FD34-4346-862F-90306C352185\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bluecoat:proxysg:6.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2C7C7AB7-603E-4499-8C9B-C280C354C7BD\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:bluecoat:proxysg:6.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6675B614-BFD6-4B5E-85AA-95D402E8B3E2\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91404\",\"source\":\"secure@symantec.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa130\",\"source\":\"secure@symantec.com\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91404\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa130\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.